Pricey Garmin and Magellan GPS navigators add features that may not be worth the cost
With more drivers turning to their smart phones for turn-by-turn directions, leading portable navigation device makers Garmin and Magellan are taking different routes in an effort to remain competitive. But our latest tests show that new top-of-the-line models from both brands offer no significant improvement to basic navigation functions nor are any easier to use than previously tested models. And, they don't come cheap.
Garmin sticks to the basics with the $350 Nuvi 3597LMTHD. This premium navigator builds on established Garmin strengths with a simple interface, quick response time, and crisp, high-resolution five-inch glass screen, all wrapped in a thin, slick package reminiscent of a smart phone.
To learn more about navigation, visit our GPS buying guide for advice and Ratings.
The biggest news is a new magnetic mount that makes installation and removal of the Garmin Nuvi 3597LMTHD a snap. Once the suction cup base is attached to the windshield, all you do is bring the unit close, and the magnet pulls it snugly into place. It's the easiest mounting system to use that we've experienced. Being virtually impossible to install it incorrectly, this clever mount is particularly helpful after dark.
But Garmin's new premium model lost some other useful features, including a pedestrian mode. Unless the slick style and handy mount are must haves for you, it's hard to justify its premium price.
Magellan has taken a different approach, loading their $250 SmartGPS with travel information and connectivity that goes way past simple guidance from point A to B. With access to Foursquare, Google search, and Yelp for anything else you might want to know on the road, the Magellan SmartGPS is meant to go head-to-head with smart-phone capability—without the phone part. Almost. It is WiFi capable, but on the road you'll normally be leveraging your phone's data plan to access those services through a Bluetooth connection, so be mindful of the limits of your data plan.
And all that information makes for a busy screen, with constantly changing pop ups offering restaurant suggestions, gas prices, and even discount coupons. Those graphics can be distracting and are so small that they're hard to read at a glance. They also take up a big chunk of the five-inch screen's real estate. Fortunately, a swipe of a finger can make them go away.
Another gripe we had with the Magellan is that it is a rather bulky device—it's 6.3-inches wide and 3.6-inches tall. Yet the image size is much smaller, at 4.3-inches wide by 2.6-inches tall. That leaves a border of about a half inch above and below the viewable screen area, and about an inch to either side. In other words, the screen occupies only half the front surface area.
The large dimensions may be necessary to accommodate all the hardware needed to provide so much information, but the result is a big device that blocks more of the road without providing a larger map. And it simply looks outdated and clunky, despite its high-tech features.
Buyers seeking guidance on-foot once they've parked the car may be disappointed with the Magellan for more reasons than its size. Unlike the Garmin, at least the SmartGPS has a pedestrian mode. But tested battery life of about 45 minutes doesn't allow much time for navigating on foot. Best walk quickly.
On the positive side, both units have traffic information and other features you'd expect in a top-of-the-line model, including lane guidance and reality view for lifelike renditions of major interchanges. Each also works with a compatible app that lets you send destinations via Bluetooth from another device, so you don't have to enter them in the car.
Bottom line: Garmin's new mount is something we'd like to see available on more devices, and the connectivity of the Magellan SmartGPS is handy, so long as you've got a passenger to operate it. But for basic navigation at a reasonable price, better choices can be found in our updated GPS Ratings, with all the latest new models from our tests.
—Jim TraversMore from Consumer Reports:
2013 New Car Preview
Best and worst used cars
Complete Ratings for 200 cars and trucks
Consumer Reports has no relationship with any advertisers or sponsors on this website. Copyright © 2007-2013 Consumers Union of U.S., Inc. No reproduction, in whole or in part, without written permission.