When tampons are taxed and candy isn't, menstruation stigma persists

Christina Westbrook
·1 min read

In Indiana, menstrual products are subject to a 7% sales tax, while items like Viagra and candy are exempt.

I am writing to express my disappointment that the proposal to exempt menstrual products from taxation was removed from Senate Bill 256 in Indiana's recent legislative session. This crucial proposal, aimed at easing financial burdens on menstruating folks, was sidelined due to fiscal concerns.

This decision reflects a broader issue of stigma surrounding menstruation in our society. Despite efforts to address this by Sen. Shelli Yoder and others, this stigma hinders progress in achieving menstrual equity.

An amendment to Senate Bill 256 which would have exempted menstrual products from taxation was taken out of the bill on March 8, 2024.
An amendment to Senate Bill 256 which would have exempted menstrual products from taxation was taken out of the bill on March 8, 2024.

Excluding this proposal perpetuates inequality and marginalizes a natural biological process which affects more than half the population. Arguments about fiscal impact overlook the necessity of exempting menstrual products, which are essential for health and well-being.

The reluctance of our legislators exemplifies this pervasive stigma. It's crucial to challenge this stigma and advocate for policies promoting menstrual equity and access to essential products.

I urge our lawmakers to reconsider and prioritize all folks’ well-being by supporting measures to eliminate the tampon tax and achieve menstrual equity. It's time to end the stigma surrounding menstruation and ensure equitable access to menstrual products for all.

Christina Westbrook lives in Bloomington.

This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Indiana tampon tax decision reflects stigma around menstruation