Letters: Throughout this ordeal the Princess of Wales has acted with grace and dignity
- Oops!Something went wrong.Please try again later.
SIR – My admiration for the Princess of Wales continues unabated (Letters, March 22). In the face of social media trolls and undesirable speculation, she has felt she has had to reveal very personal details, which most people would be able to keep to themselves and their family.
To my mind, and I am sure to countless others, she continues to uphold family values and to handle whatever comes her way with grace and dignity. We wish her well.
The Countess of Macclesfield
Northend, Oxfordshire
SIR – When will it cease – this insensitive, rude, entitled and cruel culture that has arisen over the past few years? The level of criticism and intrusiveness the Princess of Wales has faced in regard to her health has been astounding.
I hope that those who indulged in this appalling behaviour are ashamed of themselves.
Susan Eccles
Tunbridge Wells, Kent
SIR – I have had cancer at the same time as the King and the Princess of Wales. It has been wonderful how family and friends have rallied around while undergoing radical treatment. That – and the efforts of medical teams – have been truly life-enhancing.
I can deal with this illness in privacy and can control the dialogue at my own pace. What has been shocking is how the Princess of Wales has had that control taken away from her by ghastly online and media speculation.
It is telling that, in my own case, I don’t have to reveal everything to everyone. Yet sometimes I wish I had because of human nature. Some people are so self-absorbed that one can experience unkindness and impatience when in discomfort or fatigued by people who have no clue what one is going through.
Modern life is full of intolerance, and this whole episode involving the Princess just shows that some people need to calm down, show more emotional intelligence and be better aware of how their behaviour affects others.
Ben Sington
Taplow, Buckinghamshire
SIR – Yesterday morning I awoke and saw the planet flooded with tears. Men and women – young and old.
Keep going Kate. The world is behind you and willing you onward.
Susan Lyon-Heap
Egerton, Cheshire
Low-traffic schemes
SIR – I was pleased to read that the Government has finally moved to make local councils ensure they have the support of residents before implementing low-traffic neighbourhoods (report, March 17).
We are about to have a low-traffic scheme imposed on our already quiet area of Bristol. Rather insultingly, it is referred to by the council as a “liveable neighbourhood” scheme, as though the place where we have chosen to make our home is not perfectly liveable already.
We have just received the results of the “consultation” that was carried out earlier this year. Apparently (and perhaps unsurprisingly), a large majority of the respondents are not in favour of the plan because it will affect our ability to access vital routes in and out of the city.
A councillor told me last week that the council is pushing forward with the scheme on a trial basis because the consultation was designed to let residents raise their concerns and allow the council to answer them. It was “in no way a referendum”.
I think the Government (and our community) may have a battle on its hands.
Simon Armstrong
Bristol
SIR – Am I alone in seeing a disconnect between pervasive traffic restrictions and the desire of the Government to see economic growth? If people can’t get around, they can’t be as productive. It is not simply about ambulances, but also about the economy.
It may be thought that restrictions just affect the better off – stuck frustratingly in their cars. But it is especially those who are dependent who suffer. The support they need is less available.
Chris Jolly
Chigwell, Essex
Support for Ukraine
SIR – Daniel Johnson is right to warn that Russia jeopardises the peace of Europe (News Focus, March 17).
Russian aggression in Ukraine is a serious threat to the whole of Europe. Young people did not experience the old Iron Curtain. It was very bad for one half of Germany, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, the Baltic and Balkan States.
Luckily at that time the United States, Britain and France had sufficient forces in Europe for it to be evident to Russia that there would be a full-scale war if it pushed further.
No one predicted the collapse of Soviet Russia. We enjoyed the peace dividend, but Russia is back – the same monster, poking us with a stick.
The first duty of any government is to defend the nation, but our Armed Forces are so depleted that even the Chief of the General Staff has warned that we are at a 1937 moment, which means, based on experience, that thousands will soon be killed and wounded.
Like Stalin, Vladimir Putin sacrifices his own people without concern for their lives. We do not know why Russians accept this state of affairs, but they do. The Ukrainians do not. Ukraine wishes to be an open, liberal democracy like ours.
Our concern now is our safety. Voters should ask candidates at the upcoming election whether he or she will support a massive increase in our defences to meet the new threat. We must give Ukraine the materiel to sustain its war effort and win on our behalf. If it works, it will be money well spent. If it fails, we will be at war – but we will have at least tried to secure ourselves.
Sir James Pickthorn Bt
London SW6
Covid consensus
SIR – While I support Matt Ridley’s plea for a “faster and cheaper” Covid inquiry (“The six lockdown questions we need answers to”, Comment, March 17), there is one vital question that needs to be added to his list.
Why did the scientific community abandon its core guiding principles of integrity of knowledge, openness and respect of challenge? “Cancelling” those scientists who, with sound scientific evidence, dared to challenge the consensus, is one of the abiding shames of our Covid response – one that must never be repeated.
Dr David Slawson
Nairn
SIR – Matt Ridley asserts that the Covid Inquiry is “assuming it knows what went wrong – that we locked down too late”. Yet Baroness Hallett, the chair of the inquiry, has stated repeatedly that she is yet to reach any conclusions and is not acting on any assumptions. She will consider all the material that has been provided, including both oral and written evidence.
Mr Ridley outlines where he feels the inquiry is giving insufficient attention. However, most of the areas he highlights have either already been covered during our investigations or are set to be covered in future investigations.
Baroness Hallett does not intend for this inquiry to run and run. Nonetheless, the public deserves a serious, thorough and comprehensive examination of the UK’s planning and response to the pandemic.
The inquiry will produce timely and detailed recommendations as we progress. The first report will be published this summer, with public hearings set to conclude in 2026.
Ben Connah
Secretary, UK Covid-19 Inquiry
London W2
Facing up to Church links with the slave trade
SIR – Having been a volunteer for the Church of England for more than 50 years, and also worked for it professionally, I am pleased to see it leading the way in acknowledging that it has benefited financially from its involvement in the slave trade – and acting to correct the situation (Comment, March 10).
Whether or not one believes that what it is proposing to do is the best form of reparation, people must remember that Christians led the way in seeking to abolish slavery in this country, even while Members of Parliament repeatedly resisted the passing of a law to do so, preferring to maintain the benefits many of them enjoyed.
Perhaps some of the many individuals, families and organisations that have profited from their ancestors’ involvement in slavery should consider what amount of recompense they too should offer, and suggest ways in which such funds should be spent to benefit society as a whole.
Jonathan Longstaff
Buxted, East Sussex
Racehorse cruelty
SIR – The news that two racehorses died on the very first day at Cheltenham was no surprise (report, March 12).
Racehorses are bred as investments and begin “training” at 18 months and racing at two years old, even though they do not reach musculoskeletal maturity until around age six. Some are kept isolated in stalls for up to 23 hours a day, deprived of social interaction.
There is nothing noble in forcing horses, through violent whipping while perched on their back, to run at perilous speeds around a track and in dangerous proximity to one another. They suffer horrific fractures, head-on collisions, pulmonary haemorrhages and myriad other dreadful injuries that lead to the same outcome – their untimely deaths at the hands of humans.
Mark Richards
Brighton, East Sussex
Phones and fakes
SIR – At the cinema recently with my family, I was amused by the following sequence of events.
A well-known mobile phone brand sought to entice customers with the ability to manipulate images and produce entirely fake results, much to the enjoyment and gratitude of its users.
This was followed immediately by an advertisement for a brand-new audiobook reading of Nineteen Eighty-Four, in which Winston Smith bemoans the fact that the autocrat can alter history and promote lies with doctored images and news.
John Paget-Tomlinson
Headmaster, Leweston School
Sherborne, Dorset
SIR – It is strange that we now seem to have a reverse Dorian Gray effect: the portrait stays young while the person ages.
I wonder what Oscar Wilde would make of it.
Nigel Burn-Murdoch
Hurst, Berkshire
Outlandish opera
SIR – We recently went to see Manon Lescaut. The curtains opened to reveal a man slowly pouring five litres of water over the head of a fully clothed woman. Eight tall water dispensers lined the back of the stage. The chorus, dressed in a motley array of costumes, came in and frolicked and cavorted in ways that a primary school class would have found entertaining.
Manon was tightly bound, like a mummy, in what looked to me like white elastoplast. Des Grieux entered not in a coach but on a dolphin. A very tall figure dressed in a pink trouser suit and a parasol-sized hat eventually sang in a fine baritone voice.
We left at the interval, as I’m sure Clive Ashwin (“Opera’s decline”, Letters, March 17) would have done. We could not imagine what anyone new to opera would have made of this, and whether they would want to try it again.
How can English Touring Opera expect to continue to receive public money?
J T Campbell
Beccles, Suffolk
Letters to the Editor
We accept letters by email and post. Please include name, address, work and home telephone numbers.
ADDRESS: 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 0DT
EMAIL: dtletters@telegraph.co.uk
FOLLOW: Telegraph Letters on Twitter @LettersDesk
NEWSLETTER: sign up to receive Letters to the Editor here
