• Home
  • Mail
  • News
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Search
  • Mobile
  • More
Yahoo
    • Skip to Navigation
    • Skip to Main Content
    • Skip to Related Content
    • Mail
    Lifestyle Home
    Follow Us
    • Style
    • Beauty
    • Wellness
    • Shopping
    • MAKERS
    • Holiday Guide for Guys
    • Pets
    • Video
    • Horoscopes
    • Pop Culture

    Why Didn't Prince Charles Marry Camilla in the First Place?

    Caroline Hallemann
    Town & CountryNovember 18, 2019
    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share

    From Town & Country

    When a 21-year-old Prince Charles met Camilla Shand at a polo match in the early 1970s, he was immediately smitten. According to journalist Jonathan Dimbleby, "he lost his heart to her almost immediately." So why is it that they didn't get married in the first place?

    When Charles and Camilla first met, she was involved in an on-again, off-again relationship with Andrew Parker Bowles.

    Photo credit: Tim Graham - Getty Images
    Photo credit: Tim Graham - Getty Images

    Charles and Camilla met for the first time at a polo match at Windsor Great Park. During that first meeting, Camilla apparently joked about the fact that her great-grandmother had had an affair with King Edward VII, saying, “My great-grandmother was the mistress of your great-great-grandfather. I feel we have something in common.”

    At the time, Camilla was in the middle of a years-long on-again, off-again relationship with Andrew Parker Bowles, the man who would go on to become her first husband.

    "Prince Charles sort of parachuted in the middle," Patrick Beresford told Prince Charles's biographer Sally Bedell Smith. Parker Bowles happened to be on a six-month deployment to Northern Ireland and Cyprus, at the time and the Prince of Wales "landed at a convenient time," wrote Bedell Smith.

    A relationship between Charles and Camilla blossomed as they got to know one another, but Charles was still young, and he wasn't ready for something more serious. He was also about to deploy with the Royal Navy for eight months.

    Camilla also wasn't considered a suitable match for the Prince of Wales by some in the royal family.

    Photo credit: Hulton Deutsch - Getty Images
    Photo credit: Hulton Deutsch - Getty Images

    Even if Charles had wanted to settle down, he would have encountered those with serious doubts about whether Camilla was an appropriate bride for the heir to the throne. As Charles's relative Patricia Mountbatten told Bedell Smith, there were "obvious problems" with the idea of Camilla marrying the future King.

    Though it seems almost comically old fashioned now, the fact that Camilla had a dating history was a major strike against her. "The conventions of the time called for the heir to the British throne to marry a woman who at least appeared to be virginal," writes Bedell Smith.

    "You didn't want a past that hung about," Mountbatten said.

    In 1973, Camilla married her first husband, Andrew Parker Bowles.

    Photo credit: Frank Barratt - Getty Images
    Photo credit: Frank Barratt - Getty Images

    Camilla and Andrew Parker Bowles had continued to see each other, and by 1973, pressure was mounting on Parker Bowles to make it official. The couple became engaged, though only after Camilla's father, Bruce Shand, and Parker Bowles's father, Derek Parker Bowles, published an engagement notice in The Times for their children. According to Andrew's cousin John Bowes Lyon, the families had conspired to force the groom-to-be's hand.

    “Camilla was very much in love with him,” Bowes Lyon told Sally Bedell Smith. “Her parents were very keen that Andrew should marry her.

    They married that summer in a Catholic ceremony at the Guards Chapel in London, and the wedding was quite the society event, with the Queen Mother, Princess Anne, and Princess Margaret all in attendance.

    Prince Charles was reportedly devastated. "I suppose this feeling of emptiness will pass eventually," he wrote to his mentor, Lord Mountbatten.

    Camilla and Andrew went on to have two children together, Laura and Tom Parker Bowles, but in January of 1995, they announced their divorce. In public statements, they say the end of their marriage was "a private matter." They did not give a specific reason for the end of their relationship, but did offer a window into their life together. "Throughout our marriage we have always tended to follow rather different interests, but in recent years we have led completely separate lives."

    Photo credit: Hearst Owned
    Photo credit: Hearst Owned

    Prince Charles married Lady Diana Spencer in July of 1981.

    As most every royal watcher knows, when he was 32, Prince Charles married Diana Spence, and they went on to have two children, Princes William and Harry. Charles and Camilla began an affair in 1986. It eventually became public, a royal scandal that made headlines around the world. Charles and Diana divorced in 1996.

    Eventually, Charles and Camilla did marry in a civil ceremony in 2005.

    Photo credit: Tim Graham - Getty Images
    Photo credit: Tim Graham - Getty Images

    A change in the Church of England's rules about remarriage after divorce, which took effect in 2002, made it possible for Charles to marry Camilla.

    In an attempt to avoid controversy given their relationship history, the couple opted not to have a grand royal wedding, but instead married in a civil ceremony at the Guildhall in Windsor, and then had their marriage blessed by the Church in St. George's Chapel. While the Queen approved of the marriage, she was not present at her son's wedding ceremony. But she did attend the church blessing and reception.

    "The venue was never the issue for the Queen," a senior royal aide told The Telegraph at the time. "The civil nature of the service is the issue. She did not feel it was appropriate for her to attend."

    You Might Also Like

    • 12 Weekend Getaway Spas For Every Type of Occasion
    • What Your Favorite Champagne Brand Says About You
    • Beauty Gurus Share Their Makeup Secrets for Older Women
    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share

    What to Read Next

    • Walmart Canada pulls 'Let It Snow' Christmas sweater featuring a cocaine-using Santa

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Bella Hadid Just Hit the Beach in a Seriously Revealing One-Piece Swimsuit

      Harper's Bazaar
    • Michelle Obama weighs in on President Trump impeachment hearings: ‘It’s surreal’

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Swe Zin Htet on being the first openly gay Miss Universe contestant: 'People in Myanmar are not accepting of this'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Two Women Landed in the ER After Using a Vacuum to End Their Periods, According to a Nurse's Scary Viral Tweet

      Meredith Videos
    • Catherine Zeta-Jones Posted an Emotional Tribute to Kirk Douglas on His 103 Birthday

      Country Living
    • Cardi B Covers 'Vogue' with Her Daughter Kulture

      Fashionista
    • Tarek El Moussa and Heather Rae Young Snap 'Family' Holiday Pic with Kids

      House Beautiful
    • 'Fuller House' Fans Are Losing Their Minds Over All the Easter Eggs in Season 5

      Good Housekeeping
    • Jennifer Lopez Ripped Off Her Tuxedo on ‘SNL’ to Reveal Her Iconic Versace Dress

      PureWow
    • 'Blue Bloods' Sparked a Wild Fan Theory About Eddie and Jamie After the Tense Fall Finale

      Country Living
    • Meghan Markle Was Unrecognizable During an Early Charity Visit in a Baseball Cap and Jacket

      InStyle
    • Kendall Jenner's Nude Minidress Looks Like It's Dripping in Tinsel

      Harper's Bazaar
    • Dr. Pimple Popper Is Back With New Episodes — & We Have The Exclusive Trailer

      Refinery29
    • Kelly Ripa and Daughter Lola Stepped Out in Complementary Mini Dresses

      InStyle
    • This local hardware store’s $130 commercial is being dubbed ‘the best Christmas ad of the year'

      In The Know

    'The evidence is overwhelming': Combative hearing moves House closer to impeachment

    Magic One: The Senate Trial is GOVERNED by the Senate Rules... and so is the Chairman during the Trial (Justice Roberts). This isn't a Criminal trial. The Senate Rules allow any group of 51 Senators to overrule the Chairman (Roberts) on many issues (like who will be subpoenaed to testify and who will not). If 51 (or more) Senators want to have Joe Biden, Adam Schiff, and Hunter Biden testify but the Chairman (Roberts) refuses, the Senators can overrule him and send the subpoenas and they WILL testify. Equally, if 51 Senators do NOT want someone to be subpoenaed to testify, they can quash the subpoena and stop them from testifying. "If the Senate did end up conducting a trial, Rule VII gives Chief Justice Roberts control over procedural aspects of the trial, including issuing orders for specific people to testify and making decisions about disputed points of the law. However, that same rule lets McConnell circumvent Roberts’ control, potentially in ways that could limit, or expand, the impeachment process. For instance, if the House members presenting the case wanted to subpoena a witness who might give evidence against Trump, senators could ask Roberts to block the subpoena. If he refused, they could overrule him, again by a simple majority in a Republican-controlled Senate. McConnell could also use Rule VII to introduce into the trial new information that would be to Trump’s political benefit – such as asking Roberts to subpoena Joe Biden and his son Hunter, which could heighten the partisan divide, and distract or confuse the public about who is on trial for what. If Roberts declined, again the senators themselves could vote to issue the subpoenas." ================================= "Critically, and contrary to common mythology and parlance, the chief justice is not the “judge” in an impeachment trial. The Senate itself is both judge and trier of fact, and the chief justice serves as its presiding officer. The rules thus require the chief justice to direct “all forms of the proceedings” (Rule 7) and, in so doing, “to make and issue all orders, mandates, writs, and precepts authorized by the rules” (Rule 5)." The Republicans hold the Senate Majority and can easily get 51 votes to overrule Roberts... with votes to spare.

    Join the Conversation
    1 / 5

    8.1k

    • Miley Cyrus’s new tattoo may be in direct reference to her split with Liam Hemsworth

      Hello Giggles
    • Emma Stone Debuted Her Pearl Engagement Ring at the 'SNL' After-Party

      Harper's Bazaar
    • Dwayne Johnson Has Mixed Feelings About Still Being Called "The Rock"

      Good Housekeeping
    • Cardi B Just Got Hella Candid About Those Offset Cheating Rumors in a ‘Vogue’ Interview

      Cosmopolitan
    • Camila Cabello Just Joked That Shawn Mendes Might Break Up With Her

      Seventeen
    • We’re Obsessed With This Recyclable Material That Looks Just Like Terrazzo

      House Beautiful
    • "Milky Nails" Are the Manicure Trend You're Going to See All Throughout 2020

      Allure
    • Olivia Wilde talks about kindness of strangers during son's 'level 10' meltdown

      Yahoo Lifestyle Videos
    • Abandoned 5-Year-Old Carries Toddler in Extreme Cold After Adult Allegedly Left Them in Home

      People
    • What are 'unruly' bodies, and who has one?

      Yahoo Lifestyle Videos
    • Act fast! The Instant Pot DUO Plus is 50 percent off

      In The Know
    • Man hailed as 'flight angel' for comforting woman, 96, who hadn't flown in nearly 2 decades

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • This couple did their first look at the groom's mother's grave, and the photos will probably make you cry

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • 'My daughter beat cancer twice — and she's only 6 years old'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Lizzo sparked a Twitter debate after wearing a revealing outfit to a Lakers game

      Hello Giggles
    • Two years after his wife's death, 'Dallas' star Patrick Duffy still considers himself 'a married man'

      Yahoo Lifestyle