Prince Harry Loses Legal Challenge to Pay for His Own U.K. Police Protection

windsor, england april 17 prince harry arrives for the funeral of prince philip, duke of edinburgh at st georges chapel at windsor castle on april 17, 2021 in windsor, england prince philip of greece and denmark was born 10 june 1921, in greece he served in the british royal navy and fought in wwii he married the then princess elizabeth on 20 november 1947 and was created duke of edinburgh, earl of merioneth, and baron greenwich by king vi he served as prince consort to queen elizabeth ii until his death on april 9 2021, months short of his 100th birthday his funeral takes place today at windsor castle with only 30 guests invited due to coronavirus pandemic restrictions photo by victoria jones wpa poolgetty images
Prince Harry Loses Legal Challenge Over SecurityWPA Pool - Getty Images

A judge from London's High Court has rejected Prince Harry's legal bid against the British government to privately fund his own police protection while in the United Kingdom.

On Tuesday, Judge Mr. Justice Chamberlain denied the prince permission to seek a judicial review of the government's refusal to allow Harry to personally pay for his own police and security arrangements.

The British government initially stripped Harry and his wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, of taxpayer-funded police protection following their decision to step down as senior working members of the royal family in 2020. But, Harry legally contested the decision, filing a claim for a judicial review against the ruling in September 2021.

At the time, a spokesperson told that Harry felt the Home Office's decision was "unreasonable, opaque and inconsistent."

In court this week, Harry's legal team argued that there is precedent for legislative provisions that allowed for the payment of "special police services" and that "payment for policing is not inconsistent with the public interest or public confidence in the Metropolitan Police Service," the BBC reports.

However, lawyers for the Home Offic said the rejection of an individual's offer of private payments was a matter of policy, and opposed the idea that a "wealthy person should be permitted to 'buy' protective security."

Though his bid for a judicial review has been denied, Harry's legal battle for U.K. police protection isn't over. BAZAAR's Royal Editor-at-Large, Omid Scobie, notes that the prince has already won his bid for a full judicial review against the Home Office for their decision-making process over his security in the country. Additionally, his lawyers can appeal today's ruling.

"The UK will always be Prince Harry's home and a country he wants his wife and children to be safe in... With the lack of police protection comes too great a personal risk," a spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex said in a written statement last year. "The Duke and Duchess of Sussex personally fund a private security team for their family, yet that security cannot replicate the necessary police protection needed whilst in the UK. In the absence of such protection, Prince Harry and his family are unable to return to his home."

Harry's legal spokesperson previously told BAZAAR that the royal had "inherited a security risk at birth, for life," considering that "he remains sixth in line to the throne, served two tours of combat duty in Afghanistan, and in recent years his family has been subjected to well-documented neo-Nazi and extremist threats. ... While his role within the institution has changed, his profile as a member of the Royal Family has not. Nor has the threat to him and his family."

You Might Also Like