Nike vs. Hoka: The Running Sneaker Showdown

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."

There's always a constant battle between new and old. Now Hoka isn't exactly new to the game (it was founded in 2009), but relative to Nike's 1964 roots, Hoka's the new guy on the block. So when tasked to decide which brand makes a better running shoe, there's a lot being brought to the table.

To be honest, I've always been a Nike kid. My soccer cleats are Mercurials, my running shoes are Flyknits, and my racing shoes are Alphaflys. But then I started seeing Hoka everywhere. Literally everywhere—at the market, on West Side Highway, even at some dive bars. And people who loved their Hokas really loved their Hokas. So I had to see what the hype was about.

Both brands have ample variety in sneakers (although Nike's is truly an unparalleled abyss), and as it seemed like an arduously unfeasible test to test all models, I tried to keep it simple. I took one of Nike's main running shoes—the Pegasus—and decided to see how it compared to one of Hoka's most popular styles—the Clifton. While both have their loyal fans, I found myself waffling between the two pairs. Each had its own benefits and drawbacks, and eventually one won out, leading me to a final verdict alas.

Ultimately, I'm still a Nike kid. But that's because above all, it comes down to something pretty superficial. My minimalist style. Because I often go from my workouts straight to my daily life, Nikes are the closest I can get to achieving my niche need to have my running shoes seamlessly blend into my outfit. But Hoka has a cult-like following for a reason, and I finally understood why. If you want supportive, sturdy sneakers, that's the Clifton for you. So with that in mind, I break down the ultimate sneaker showdown: Nike vs Hoka.

Nike, Pegasus

You can't go wrong with a pair of Pegasus. Having been first introduced in 1983, the style rests at the intersection of performance and affordability. But if 40 years of history isn't convincing enough, I've got the lowdown on why these have been paving roads for so many years.

Simply put, the sneaker is reliable. There's high responsiveness that gives you more spring in your step, medium cushioning to keep your steps soft, and neutral support to stabilize your stride. It's breathable, designed with the intention to make the inner confines of the shoe tailored to your foot. One of the best parts about the sneaker is that the toe box is just the right size—not too wide that your foot is sliding around, but not too narrow that it's squishing your baby toe.

Yes, it is supportive, but it's not the most supportive shoe on the market. That's where Hoka steps in. But when it comes down to why Nike wins the battle (for me), it's about style. I like my sneakers to be sleek and subtle, transitioning from my workout to the rest of my day. When I travel, I can wear my Pegasus on the plane, to the gym, and then out and about for all the explorations I embark on. The model itself also comes with not just a range of colors, but purposes as well. There's a GORE-TEX Pegasus for the trail runner, a FlyEase for both on and off roading, even a Turbo for racing. And it's this versatility that gives Pegasus the edge.

Hoka, Clifton 9

Despite my aficionado for the Pegasus, Hoka's Clifton has captured the preferences of runners all over the world for a reason. Built for walking or running, the ninth iteration of the sneaker has mastered lightweight cushion. The responsive foam and improved outsole design increase bounce, and the molded midsole is enveloping your foot in support. The recycled composition of the shoe—recycled content mesh, recycled polyester laces, vegan construction—brings sustainability to the forefront.

Hot (and irresponsible) take: I don't care too much about support when I run. I just want something that's fast and light, and if my knees and feet hurt, I take a break for a few days. But I also know that's not a healthy and long-lasting approach. So if you, unlike me, really want a shoe that's going to go the extra mile to prevent any feet issues, Clifton does that. My podiatrist swears by them. I don't feel pain in my arches or toes when I run in them. I know that the shoes are actually good for my feet. So yeah, a pair of Hokas are for the responsible person.

The reason why I can't get behind them? Ultimately it's jut the clunkiness. When I wear running sneakers, I like to feel like I'm barefoot. Even though these are incredibly lightweight, I can't get behind the intentionally chunky design. But that's just me. And really, between Nike and Hoka, you're choosing from the best of the best.

There's always a constant battle between new and old. Now Hoka isn't exactly new to the game (it was founded in 2009), but relative to Nike's 1964 roots, Hoka's the new guy on the block. So when tasked to decide which brand makes a better running shoe, there's a lot of history to consider.

To be honest, I've always been a Nike kid. My soccer cleats are Mercurials, my running shoes are Flyknits, and my racing shoes are Alphaflys. But then I started seeing Hoka everywhere. Literally everywhere—at the market, on West Side Highway, even at some dive bars. And people who love their Hokas really love their Hokas. It was time to see what the hype was about.

Both brands have ample variety in sneakers (although Nike's is truly an unparalleled abyss), and as it seemed like an arduously unfeasible task to test all models, I tried to keep it simple. I took one of Nike's main running shoes—the Pegasus—and decided to see how it compared to one of Hoka's most popular styles—the Clifton. While both have their loyal fans, I found myself waffling between the two pairs. Each had its own benefits and drawbacks.

I'll always be a Nike kid, because at the end of the day it comes down to something pretty basic: my minimalist style. Because I often go from my workouts straight to my daily life, Nikes are the closest I can get to achieving my niche need to have my running shoes seamlessly blend into my outfit. But! Hoka has a cult-like following for a reason, and I finally understood why. If you want supportive, sturdy sneakers, that's the Clifton for you. So with that in mind, I break down the ultimate sneaker showdown: Nike vs Hoka.

Pegasus 40 Road Running Shoes

You can't go wrong with a pair of Pegasus. Having been first introduced in 1983, the style rests at the intersection of performance and affordability. But if 40 years of history isn't convincing enough, I've got the lowdown on why these have been paving roads for so many years.

Simply put, the sneaker is reliable. Its high responsiveness gives you more spring in your step, the medium cushioning keeps your steps soft, and its neutral support stabilizes your stride. All combined with being breathable and designed with the intention to make the inner confines of the shoe tailored to your foot. One of the best parts about the sneaker is that the toe box is just the right size—not too wide that your foot is sliding around, but not too narrow that it's squishing your baby toe.

Yes, it is supportive, but it's not the most supportive shoe on the market. That's where Hoka steps in. But when it comes down to why Nike wins the battle (for me), it's about style. I like my sneakers to be sleek and subtle, transitioning from my workout to the rest of my day. When I travel, I can wear my Pegasus on the plane, to the gym, and then out and about for all the explorations I embark on. The model itself also comes with not just a range of colors, but purposes as well. There's a GORE-TEX Pegasus for the trail runner, a FlyEase for both on and off roading, even a Turbo for racing. And it's this versatility that gives Pegasus the edge.

Clifton 9 Soes

Despite my aficionado for the Pegasus, Hoka's Clifton has captured the preferences of runners all over the world for a reason. Built for walking or running, the ninth iteration of the sneaker has mastered the lightweight cushion. The responsive foam and improved outsole design increase bounce, and the molded midsole is enveloping your foot in support. The recycled composition of the shoe—recycled content mesh, recycled polyester laces, vegan construction—brings sustainability to the forefront.

Hot (and irresponsible) take: I don't care too much about support when I run. I just want something that's fast and light, and if my knees and feet hurt, I take a break for a few days. But I also know that's not a healthy and long-lasting approach. So if you, unlike me, really want a shoe that's going to go the extra mile to prevent any feet issues, the Clifton does that. My podiatrist swears by them. I don't feel pain in my arches or toes when I run in them. I know that the shoes are actually good for my feet. So yeah, a pair of Hokas are for the responsible person.

The reason why I can't get behind them? Ultimately it's jut the clunkiness. When I wear running sneakers, I like to feel like I'm barefoot. Even though these are incredibly lightweight, I can't get behind the intentionally chunky design. But that's just me. And really, between Nike and Hoka, you're choosing from the best of the best.

You Might Also Like

• Kid Cudi Is All Right

• 16 Best Shoe Organizers For Storing and Displaying Your Kicks