Emily Ratajkowski insists that she can both voice her political beliefs and pose for sexy photo shoots, thank you very much.
After a video of the model slathering herself in spaghetti was released on Sunday by LOVE magazine, she was criticized — most notably by Piers Morgan — for using feminism as her reason for participating in the project.
This is Emily Ratajkowski 'promoting feminism'.
Somewhere, Emmeline Pankhurst just vomited. pic.twitter.com/fO7ovctsVb
— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) December 5, 2017
I hope my daughter aspires to a more substantial feminist ideal than writhing semi-naked in spaghetti for publicity & Instagram likes. https://t.co/vZzSEd2bNv
— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) December 7, 2017
No, it's in the name of stupidity. https://t.co/kDajlvcNBt
— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) December 5, 2017
On Twitter, Morgan invoked Emmeline Pankhurst, a leader of the British suffragette movement, to say that she would have been disgusted by Ratajkowski’s display, adding, “I hope my daughter aspires to a more substantial feminist ideal than writhing semi-naked in spaghetti for publicity & Instagram likes.”
In his assessment, Morgan takes issue with the accompanying interview Ratajkowski had with the publication, in which the 26-year-old revealed that she believes feminism is about taking a stand for something, even if that means being sexy.
“Personal choice is the core ideal in my concept of feminism,” she said. “Katie [Grand, LOVE’s editor] directed us to say ‘Stay Strong’ at the end of each video and I think it’s a message from one woman to another. You’re watching a video of a girl grinding in lingerie or whatever else and she is looking into the camera at the end saying, ‘you do you, however YOU want to, f*** the rest’.”
For the last three years, the U.K. magazine has released a version of an advent calendar featuring a new A-list woman every day of December, leading up to Christmas. Kendall Jenner, Ashley Graham, and Bella Hadid have each made an appearance so far, each starring in a video that promotes their strength as a woman.
“It’s festive, it’s fun and it’s everything we love about women enjoying being women, on their own terms,” LOVE editor Katie Grand said on the project page.
Ratajkowski responded to Morgan’s shaming in a tweet, reiterating her point.
“Lol never said my love video was a feminist statement. But now it’s worth saying that telling women what to do with their bodies & sexuality is actually just classic sexism,” she wrote. “I can have opinions about feminism & also do sexy photo shoots k thanks.”
Lol never said my love video was a feminist statement. But now it’s worth saying that telling women what to do with their bodies & sexuality is actually just classic sexism. I️ can have opinions about feminism & also do sexy photo shoots k thanks
— Emily Ratajkowski (@emrata) December 7, 2017
She added in a separate note, “In the wake of Harvey fallout and women coming forward with incredible amounts of sexual harassment cases, I have been so disappointed to hear women talk about ‘modesty’ and ‘our responsibility’ as if we need to, yet again, adjust to make it ‘easier’ for the rest of the world. I’m tired of having to consider how I might be perceived by men if I wear the short skirt or post a sexy Instagram. I want to do what I want to do. Feminism isn’t about adjusting, it’s about freedom and choice.”
Others, including journalist Anila Dhami, also sprang to Ratajkowski’s defense, tweeting to Morgan that his comments had proved Ratajkowski’s point.
Piers, the Suffragettes fought for freedom and liberation. One woman’s freedom is another woman’s idea of objectification. And that’s why feminism is about choice – because women are also independent choice-makers. Your opinion could be seen as oppressive- beauty of subjectivism!
— Anila Dhami (@AnilaDhami) December 7, 2017
Piers Morgan had called her “stupid” for imagining that feminism had anything to do with her sexy, spaghetti-filled shoot, but she firmly pushed back.
“I don’t care about your reaction or what you do with my expression of self. In fact, it has nothing to do with you at all and that’s the point-which is why it feels good,” continued. “Ultimately, if a woman wants to wear a burka or nothing at all, it’s great if it’s what she wants and feels good about.”
And I hope for your daughters sake that someone like you doesn’t treat her the way you’re treating these women someday.
— Billy Flynn (@billymflynn) December 7, 2017
There is nothing "anti-feminist" about a woman wanting to reveal her body in certain clothing or in photoshoots. What is anti-feminist is the media giving exposure, opportunities, power and money ONLY to women who do take their clothes off and look a certain way.
— Zen Mr. Bean (@zenzation22) December 7, 2017
Ratajkowski has long stood up for her right to celebrate her sex appeal and her view that women who want to be sexy should have the choice to do so without feeling slut-shamed for it.
“To me, female sexuality and sexiness, no matter how conditioned it may be by a patriarchal ideal, can be incredibly empowering for a woman if she feels it is empowering to her,” she told the magazine during her video shoot. “The way I dress, act, flirt, dance, have sex — those are my decisions and they shouldn’t be impacted by men.”
She also cited the Harvey Weinstein allegations as a reason for women not to let men dictate the choices they make about their bodies, arguing that invoking “modesty” and “responsibility” is yet another way they do so.
Read more from Yahoo Lifestyle:
- Female doctors share what it’s really like to be a woman in medicine
- Sidebarring is the new social media sin you’ve already committed
- Texas students were forced to do ‘bear crawls’ at school, and the internet has a lot of feelings