Drones equipped with lasers uncover secrets of bloody WWII battle

 Dugout with entrance from the Battle of the Bulge site.
Dugout with entrance from the Battle of the Bulge site.

Aerial drones equipped with lasers have revealed the secrets of the Battle of the Bulge, the largest and bloodiest battle fought by the U.S. in World War II.

The drones revealed 941 traces of the battle, including dugouts and bomb craters, according to a study published Tuesday (Aug. 15) in the journal Antiquity.

Officially known as the Ardennes Counteroffensive, the Battle of the Bulge took place between December 1944 and January 1945 in eastern Belgium and Luxembourg, according to the Imperial War Museum in London. Despite being such a huge WWII battle, dense forests in the region shrouded much of the archaeological evidence left behind.

"Although this is a 'high-profile' battlefield, studied intensively by military historians and the subject of significant attention in museums and the popular media, little has been published on its material remains," study lead author Birger Stichelbaut, an archaeologist at Ghent University in Belgium, said in a statement.

Related: World War II 'horror bunker' run by infamous Unit 731 discovered in China

To uncover remnants from the battle, scientists outfitted drones with a remote sensing technology called lidar (light detection and ranging), which uses pulsed lasers to form digital maps of the landscape. They surveyed between the city of St. Vith and the village of Schönberg — an area that was once the central zone of the Battle of the Bulge — and discovered various traces of the war, including artillery platforms, trenches and foxholes (small forts to protect soldiers from enemy fire).

"This [lidar technique] allowed for traces of the battle to be observed on a scale not known until now," Stichelbaut said.

Image 1 of 12

Map of Battle of the Bulge site terrain with shaded gradation derived from the 15cm DTM.
Map of Battle of the Bulge site terrain with shaded gradation derived from the 15cm DTM.

Image 2 of 12

Study areas and position of front lines at the Battle of the Bulge site.
Study areas and position of front lines at the Battle of the Bulge site.

Image 3 of 12

Study areas and position of front lines from the Battle of the Bulge site.
Study areas and position of front lines from the Battle of the Bulge site.

Image 4 of 12

Aerial photograph of the Battle of the Bulge site taken April 16, 1945.
Aerial photograph of the Battle of the Bulge site taken April 16, 1945.

Image 5 of 12

Arial view of Battle of the Bulge map enhanced by LiDAR visualisations.
Arial view of Battle of the Bulge map enhanced by LiDAR visualisations.

Image 6 of 12

Types of traces visible on the relief visualisations on Battle of the Bulge site derived from the 15cm DTM.
Types of traces visible on the relief visualisations on Battle of the Bulge site derived from the 15cm DTM.

Image 7 of 12

Dugout with entrance from the Battle of the Bulge site.
Dugout with entrance from the Battle of the Bulge site.

Image 8 of 12

Archaeological detection in Battle of the Bulge site with interpretative map (orthophoto).
Archaeological detection in Battle of the Bulge site with interpretative map (orthophoto).

Image 9 of 12

Battle of the Bulge site with LiDAR imagery.
Battle of the Bulge site with LiDAR imagery.

Image 10 of 12

Interpretative map of the Lindscheid area of the Battle of the Bulge site.
Interpretative map of the Lindscheid area of the Battle of the Bulge site.

Image 11 of 12

Map of study area of the Herresbach (A); Prümerberg (B); and Schlierbach areas of the Battle of the Bulge site
Map of study area of the Herresbach (A); Prümerberg (B); and Schlierbach areas of the Battle of the Bulge site

Image 12 of 12

Map of study area of the Herresbach (A); Prümerberg (B); and Schlierbach areas of the Battle of the Bulge site
Map of study area of the Herresbach (A); Prümerberg (B); and Schlierbach areas of the Battle of the Bulge site

After discovering these features on the virtual map, researchers visited the sites, which helped them identify three distinct phases of the Battle of the Bulge. During the first phase, before the offensive, the Allies maintained a steady front line using U.S. field artillery battalions positioned a few miles west of the area. The researchers surveying this area found artillery fuses, artillery platforms and field fortifications that they believe can likely be attributed to this pre-offensive phase.

During the second phase, at the start of the German offensive, more than 200,000 German troops and nearly 1,000 tanks launched an attack on Allied soldiers. This mayhem left behind field fortifications and German objects at American artillery banks, which likely means that German forces used abandoned American fortifications during the battle, the study's authors wrote.

The final phase was the turning point of this battle, marked by "numerous extant bomb craters," which "indicate that the Allied air forces were able to establish tactical dominance once the weather improved," they wrote. However, the researchers added that some of these craters may have been from earlier points in the battle.

RELATED STORIES

Mass grave from Nazi atrocity discovered in Poland's 'Death Valley'

Nazi bomb plot cubes could finally be identified

30 incredible sunken wrecks from WWI and WWII

"This paper highlights the wide range of new technology, including LiDAR and drones, that is now being employed by [conflict] archaeologists," James Symonds, a professor of historical archaeology at the University of Amsterdam who was not involved in the study, told Live Science in an email. He added that this research shows how contemporary archaeology can shed new light on "well-known historical events from the recent past."

Moving forward, this technique could be applied to other forested areas of Europe, thereby growing our understanding of different battlefields, the study's authors said. It could also help protect valuable heritage sites, according to Symonds.

"It is significant as it highlights the need to devise cultural heritage strategies to safeguard future heritage, while at the same time demonstrating the difficulties of recovering traces of mechanised and highly mobile modern warfare," he said.