Coking coal exports from the United States has filled some of the void created in China by its unofficial ban on Australian exports of the commodity over the past five months as trade manipulation creates "winners and losers", economists said.
And while only representing a small fraction of Australia's pre-ban coal exports to China, the US sold nearly 300,000 tonnes of coking coal used in steel production to China in February from nearly zero in October, China customs data showed.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
China has met 80 per cent of its energy purchase commitments with the US so far this year, according to an update by the Peterson Institute for International Economics' senior fellow Chad Bown two weeks ago, although it hit only 39 per cent of the target in the first year of the deal in 2020.
It is not the first time the US has reached similar levels of coal exports to China, although Chinese purchases of American coal have tended to be more volatile and irregular over the past few years.
In contrast, Australia's total exports of both coking and thermal coal - used for power generation - fell from 2.5 million tonnes in October to zero since December.
Before the ban, Australia was regularly averaging between 6 million tonnes and 7 million tonnes of both thermal and coking coal exports to China.
During its full year results presentation last month, American coal company Warrior Met Coal explained how the ban on Australian coal had created opportunities for American coal miners.
When the ban kicked in, many Chinese customers rushed to secure the limited supply of non-Australian premium coal and in turn Australian supply which was normally reserved for China was offered to alternative markets in Europe and South America, Warrior Met Coal chief executive Walter Scheller said.
"We were able to successfully attract new Chinese customers during the fourth quarter, which partially offset some of the impact of the depressed pricing environment experienced in our natural markets," he said.
Australia's loss has created new gains for the US, analysts said.
"After all, this import ban paved the way for various brands of US coals to make their way into China, something that wouldn't have been possible if Australian coals were still being sold into China," commodity and energy price agency Argus Media senior analyst Lee Rou Urn said.
"That said, US coking coal still pales in comparison to Australian coking coal in various ways, quality, consistency of specs, as well as its considerably small output which will in no way be close to meeting the kind of volumes that Australia can export to China in the old days."
The ban on Australian coal has led to new trade patterns in China. Due to a shortage of high-quality coal - usually from Australia - Chinese steel mills have also been forced to adapt to lower quality local coal, through more product blending to increase performance, Lee said.
"Yes it is true that China is short on coking coal at the moment, but they're dealing with it as best they can, be it by tweaking their blends to use more domestic coal or by taking as much suitable material from the US and Canada as possible in the meantime," he added.
China has, so far, managed to ramp up its local coal production in the absence of Australia imports, helped by volatile and sometimes lower, coal demand at steel mills in the past year for example, when hit by coronavirus lockdowns, Navigate Commodities managing director Atilla Widnell said.
"Chinese blast furnaces have raised capacity utilisation rates through March and restrictions on import availability poses a real problem going forward," Widnell said.
"If the situation is not brought under control sooner rather than later, this might be the 'straw that breaks the camel's back' with respect to opening the gates to Australian coking coal."
"It goes to show that managed trade is a lose-lose for everyone concerned," Stephen Kirchner, programme director for trade and investment at the University of Sydney's United States Studies Centre said.
This article originally appeared in the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the most authoritative voice reporting on China and Asia for more than a century. For more SCMP stories, please explore the SCMP app or visit the SCMP's Facebook and Twitter pages. Copyright © 2021 South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2021. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.