S.X.M: He didn't support the war in Iraq and was correct about Stop and Frisk in NYC. And how it works. As a aside, Left's argument against Stop and Frisk is always mind-boggling. "IT'S BAD BECAUSE MORE HISPANIC AND BLACK PEOPLE GET STOPPED ARRESTED!" Doesn't make you go "What the F....." somethings wrong with you. But pretending otherwise prevents Hillary from answering for her vote for Iraq or failure to get a Status of Forces Agreement for soldiers, which could have prevent ISIS. Or the fact harsh mandatory sentencing was one of Bill Clinton's signature efforts. But this isn't 1994, and Trump isn't Mitt Rommey. Clinton's can't hide their record and Trump didn't wilt. Clinton managed to salvage the evening only with the help of Lester Holt, who shock of shocks steered the conversation toward everything Clinton wanted him to. Holt was all but threatened by Clinton campaign and its influential allies prior to the debate. He'd lose his access in DC and such if he didn't go after Trump. It worked. So, if that's how Clinton is going to do it, Trump has to get that nasty. Deck is stacked against him, so he doesn't need to play nice.