Skip to Navigation
Skip to Main Content
Skip to Related Content
Supreme Court nominee emails reignite Democratic query on past testimony
By Richard Cowan and Lawrence Hurley
September 11, 2018
Read Full Article
Sign in to post a message.
reuters newsflash, the time for dem questions was last week, its over....democrats dont have the votes....America welcomes supreme court justice Brett Kavanaugh.....liberals, if you want to pick judges you must WIN elections 1st
Reuters newsflash, the time for Democratic questions was last week, its over....Democrats "Don't have the votes to STOP the confirmation" We The Legal Voting American Citizens can't wait for Kavanaugh to be seated as our newest Supreme court justice... Trump just keeps winning, yes further proof President Donald J. Trump is "Making America Great Again!"....America welcomes Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.....Socialists, if you want to pick judges you must WIN elections 1st.."The Big Red Wave is coming" PS -Socialists better "Bubble Wrap Judge Ginsberg" because Next up, replacing Ginsburg.
Many, Many "Thanks" to "Our President Donald J. Trump for appointing a very qualified "Constitutional Judge" -Judge Brett Kavanaugh
Dominique with 9,867 reactions is another pseudonym for An Engineer
Over 60 million people voted for Trump and we all knew exactly what we were getting.
The Democrats have nothing on this nominee and they know he is more than qualified to enter the Supreme Court as a Justice. The Democrats have received more paperwork on Kavanaugh than the last FIVE Supreme Court Justices who were sworn in! All the left is trying to do is obstruct and the majority of Americans know it!
Like Roe v Wade, Judge Kavanaugh's appointment to the Supreme Court is Settled Law or it should be.
There's nothing in those emails that suggests Kavanaugh "handled" Haynes' nomination, Sorry Dems, Try again
So Durbin is saying wait, wait, wait. We need to reopen the hearing, because I found another way to spin an email. Sorry Senator, but you're a day late and a dollar short. a Vote on the floor is all that's left and welcome new justice Kavanaugh.
Let's twist things just so we can get the answer we want. Typical liberal thinking. He never said that he never discussed or was in no way involved with the Haynes confirmation. Rather, he said "it was not one of the nominations that I handled." Writing a single email about the nominee is far different from handling the confirmation. Talk about grasping at straws.
Yeah, well the socialists had their chance to ask all the questions they wanted last week. Welcome to the Supreme Court Judge Kavanaugh. Next up, replacing Ginsburg.
Ah snowflakes, the email in this article backs up the fact that Kavanaugh was not involved with the nomination. He was asking a question directed at the people involved with the nomination. Nothing here.
"tilting the court even further to the right.".....WOW, maybe I'm mistaken, but the Constitution mentions nothing about political views qualifiying or disqualifying a nominee. Deal with it!
So what, they had their opportunity to ask all the questions they wanted. Time to appoint the newest Supreme Court Justice. Long live Kavanaugh.