Is Sino Land Company Limited’s (HKG:83) ROE Of 10.35% Sustainable?

In this article:

Sino Land Company Limited (SEHK:83) outperformed the Real Estate Development industry on the basis of its ROE – producing a higher 10.35% relative to the peer average of 9.39% over the past 12 months. While the impressive ratio tells us that 83 has made significant profits from little equity capital, ROE doesn’t tell us if 83 has borrowed debt to make this happen. We’ll take a closer look today at factors like financial leverage to determine whether 83’s ROE is actually sustainable. View our latest analysis for Sino Land

Breaking down Return on Equity

Return on Equity (ROE) weighs Sino Land’s profit against the level of its shareholders’ equity. It essentially shows how much the company can generate in earnings given the amount of equity it has raised. In most cases, a higher ROE is preferred; however, there are many other factors we must consider prior to making any investment decisions.

Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders Equity

ROE is assessed against cost of equity, which is measured using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) – but let’s not dive into the details of that today. For now, let’s just look at the cost of equity number for Sino Land, which is 8.38%. This means Sino Land returns enough to cover its own cost of equity, with a buffer of 1.98%. This sustainable practice implies that the company pays less for its capital than what it generates in return. ROE can be broken down into three different ratios: net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. This is called the Dupont Formula:

Dupont Formula

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = (annual net profit ÷ sales) × (sales ÷ assets) × (assets ÷ shareholders’ equity)

ROE = annual net profit ÷ shareholders’ equity

SEHK:83 Last Perf Apr 20th 18
SEHK:83 Last Perf Apr 20th 18

The first component is profit margin, which measures how much of sales is retained after the company pays for all its expenses. Asset turnover shows how much revenue Sino Land can generate with its current asset base. Finally, financial leverage will be our main focus today. It shows how much of assets are funded by equity and can show how sustainable the company’s capital structure is. Since ROE can be artificially increased through excessive borrowing, we should check Sino Land’s historic debt-to-equity ratio. Currently the debt-to-equity ratio stands at a low 1.93%, which means its above-average ROE is driven by its ability to grow its profit without a significant debt burden.

SEHK:83 Historical Debt Apr 20th 18
SEHK:83 Historical Debt Apr 20th 18

Next Steps:

ROE is one of many ratios which meaningfully dissects financial statements, which illustrates the quality of a company. Sino Land’s above-industry ROE is encouraging, and is also in excess of its cost of equity. ROE is not likely to be inflated by excessive debt funding, giving shareholders more conviction in the sustainability of high returns. ROE is a helpful signal, but it is definitely not sufficient on its own to make an investment decision.

For Sino Land, there are three relevant aspects you should further examine:

  1. Financial Health: Does it have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.

  2. Valuation: What is Sino Land worth today? Is the stock undervalued, even when its growth outlook is factored into its intrinsic value? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether Sino Land is currently mispriced by the market.

  3. Other High-Growth Alternatives : Are there other high-growth stocks you could be holding instead of Sino Land? Explore our interactive list of stocks with large growth potential to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.

Advertisement