Rob Bishop Continues His Taxpayer-Funded Feud With Patagonia
WASHINGTON — For the second time in as many months, the House Committee on Natural Resources has taken a public swing at Patagonia. This time it’s after the outdoor retailer turned down an invitation to testify before the legislative body about its opposition to the Trump administration’s efforts to dismantle national monuments.
On Friday, the committee — which is chaired by Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah) — posted an image to Twitter that reads, “Patagonia Is Lying Hiding.” The post from the official government account links to a letter Bishop sent Friday to company CEO Yvon Chouinard in which he accuses the company of “living in a bubble” and shielding itself from competing viewpoints.
“In my 15 years of congressional service I have found most people jump at the opportunity to share their views before Congress — at least those who are confident in their positions,” Bishop wrote.
Unfortunately, @Patagonia refused to appear publicly to defend their lies
Letter → https://t.co/oZdZumDpnk pic.twitter.com/hMy4BToxr8— Natural Resources (@NatResources) January 5, 2018
A fierce critic of the Trump administration’s monthslong review of protected national monuments, Patagonia has joined a coalition that’s suing to block the sweeping cuts that President Donald Trump made last month to Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments. After Trump signed a pair of proclamations to dismantle the protected Utah sites, the company updated its home page with the words “The President Stole Your Land.”
In a post that closely resembled the one from Patagonia, Bishop’s committee accused the outdoor retailer of lying in order to sell its merchandise. The response raised both ethical and legal questions.
Walter Shaub, the former director of the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, said at the time that the “attack” on Patagonia “sure looks a lot like a violation” of House committee rules on social media communication.
.@Patagonia doesn't want #MonumentsForAll, they just want your money #BearsEars pic.twitter.com/2nuvfS0imZ
— Natural Resources (@NatResources) December 8, 2017
A week later, on Dec. 15, Bishop invited Patagonia to join the committee to discuss its views on monuments and federal land management.
Chouinard declined for his company. In a Dec. 19 response he said has “little hope” that Bishop’s invitation was in good faith.
“I find it disingenuous that after unethically using taxpayers’ resources to call us liars, you would ask me to testify in front of a committee for a matter already decided by the administration and applauded by the Utah delegation just a week ago,” he wrote. “A macabre celebration of the largest reduction in public lands in American history.”
Chouinard accused Bishop’s committee of being “like many committees in this failed Orwellian government” and “shackled to special interests of oil, gas, and mining.”
In his letter Friday, Bishop again blasted the company for its “continued effort to mislead the public” about the Utah monument rollbacks, in particular its claim that the move represents the “largest elimination of protected land in American history.”
“High-profile corporate citizens who make factually inaccurate and misleading statements and then hide from further scrutiny do a disservice to their customers and the American public,” Bishop wrote. He added that “although it is your right, living in a bubble isn’t healthy, nor is it conducive to a robust discussion on important matters of public policy.”
While it’s true that the collective 2 million acres that the Trump administration has stripped from the two Utah monuments remain public and under federal control, withdrawing monument status opens the door for drilling, mining and other development.
Bishop hasn’t been alone in the fight against Patagonia.
Following the administration’s rollbacks in Utah, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke — who led the controversial monuments review — dismissed the private company as a “special interest” that makes its products in China. He told Fox Business that it “should focus on how to bring manufacturing back into the country instead of lying to the public about losing federal land.”
Love HuffPost? Become a founding member of HuffPost Plus today.
Bishop Response to Patagonia by CM D'Angelo on Scribd
Also on HuffPost
Basin and Range National Monument, Nevada
Bears Ears National Monument, Utah
Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument, California
Canyons of the Ancients National Monument, Colorado
Carrizo Plain National Monument, California
Cascade Siskiyou National Monument, Oregon
Craters of the Moon National Monument, Idaho
Giant Sequoia National Monument, California
Gold Butte National Monument, Nevada
Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument, Arizona
Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument, Utah
Hanford Reach National Monument, Washington
Ironwood Forest National Monument, Arizona
Mojave Trails National Monument, California
Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks National Monument, New Mexico
Rio Grande del Norte National Monument, New Mexico
Sand to Snow National Monument, California
San Gabriel Mountains National Monument, California
Sonoran Desert National Monument, Arizona
Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument, Montana
Vermilion Cliffs National Monument, Arizona
Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument, Maine
Marianas Trench Marine National Monument, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands/Pacific Ocean
Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument, Atlantic Ocean
Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument, Pacific Ocean
Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument, Hawaii/Pacific Ocean
Rose Atoll Marine National Monument, American Samoa/Pacific Ocean
This article originally appeared on HuffPost.