The First Amendment says that Congress “shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech.” Over the years, the Supreme Court has read that to mean that the government, more broadly, cannot limit free speech. At the same time, the Court has shown great deference to laws intended to protect religious, racial, and sexual minorities. Some scholars have argued that hateful speech should face the same level of scrutiny given to libel and true threats.
Does the First Amendment protect hate speech? Can Courts meaningfully decide what counts as hate speech and what does not?
Joining us to discuss these important questions and more are two leading scholars of constitutional law.
Shannon Gilreath is Professor of Law and Professor of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Wake Forest University Law School. His books include Sexual Politics: The Gay Person in America Today (2006) and The End of Straight Supremacy: Realizing Gay Liberation (2011).
Keith Whittington is William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics at Princeton and author of the upcoming book, Why Free Speech is Central to the Mission of a University.
Today’s show was engineered by David Stotz and produced by Ugonna Eze and Scott Bomboy. Research was provided by Lana Ulrich.
Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate, at bit.ly/constitutionweekly.
We the People is a member of Slate’s Panoply network. Check out the full roster of podcasts at Panoply.fm.
Also, please be sure to rate our podcast on iTunes and other platforms!
And finally, despite our congressional charter, the National Constitution Center is a private nonprofit; we receive little government support, and we rely on the generosity of people around the country who are inspired by our nonpartisan mission of constitutional debate and education. Please consider becoming a member to support our work, including this podcast. Visit constitutioncenter.org to learn more.