S.: Her speech was simply more empty rhetoric. I'm a Bernie supporter who, at this time, will be voting Green, as that is the next closest to the specific policies that I support. Bernie I still believe is the rightful candidate; Clinton's collusion with the DNC is evident, as she hired Wasserman-Schultz immediately to be the honorary chair of her campaign. Shouldn't she have chastised her and the DNC for fraud against a candidate? Instead, she hired WS. Obviously payback for her work in cheating the American people of their right to a fair primary election. How can so many people be drinking the kool-aid? If ALL of the Bernie supporters, along with Independents and disgruntled Republicans would vote Green, we'd have a unique new party in power. Obviously no one can match Sanders. Clinton didn't even specify the NEW progressive Democratic party agenda. She didn't mention "55 and over getting Medicare", for instance, just a vacuous "affordable health care". (What happened to "quality" health care, such as what she has?). No stopping fracking, a huge environmental issue...the list goes on and on. More corporate "compromises". We don't have time for weak spine compromises. Admit that corporate special interest group donations form legislation, and that is the ONLY reason why anyone has to "compromise". We don't want "steps", we don't want to "plant the seeds in our gardens" even though we won't see the results. Enough is enough. We go to war at the bat of an eyelash, why should we wait 50 more years, after we're dead, to get high quality single payer health care? It never takes any time at all to get permission to kill someone with a drone, why should we take "steps" to transition to clean energy, when destruction happens without waiting?