Minnesota Prosecutor Faces the Million-Dollar Question: Did This Cop Have to Kill Ricky Cobb II?

Kalyn Womack
·1 min read
393
Screenshot: Facebook
Screenshot: Facebook

Sighhh. Here we go again, y’all. Another prosecutor must decide from the results of an investigation if a police officer was justified in fatally shooting a Black man. Though, word has it that not all the officers swept into it agreed to cooperate with the investigation.

So, how thorough really was the probe?

Read more

But she also said she was disappointed to learn from state investigators about a lack of cooperation from some patrol employees who weren’t the subject of the investigation but potentially had useful information. She stressed that “the family, the community, and the troopers involved in this incident all deserve answers.”

Bakari Sellers, who represents Cobb’s family, said in a statement that while it was troubling that some patrol staff wasn’t cooperating, the days of “turning a blind eye are over.”

“Accountability,” Sellers said, “is coming no matter how hard you try to hide.”

According to state law, police officers are authorized to use deadly force when preventing the escape of a person who the officer believes committed a crime or attempted to commit a crime. The officer should also give a warning ahead of deadly use.

It’s unclear in the footage if Cobb was given a warning that he’d be shot. Seide and his two colleagues were placed on leave upon the investigation. Though, Cobb’s family and local advocates want them to get the boot altogether.

“The circumstances simply did not require the use of deadly force. Those officers acted recklessly and they must be held accountable,” said Nekima Levy Armstrong, founder of the Racial Justice Network in the statement via AP.

More from The Root

Sign up for The Root's Newsletter. For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Click here to read the full article.