LOS ANGELES (AP) — A judge overseeing the trial of five former officials accused of looting a working-class California city rejected a juror's misgivings Thursday about guilty verdicts reached the day before and told all 12 panelists to keep trying to decide dozens of unresolved counts.
Jurors reached mixed verdicts on Wednesday of guilty and not guilty for a former mayor and four former Bell City Council members charged with misappropriating public funds.
Superior Court Judge Kathleen Kennedy heard arguments Thursday from defense attorneys about a note from a juror who acknowledged misgivings about the guilty verdicts. But Kennedy refused to revisit the previous decisions.
"The chips are going to fall where they fall," she said.
Instead, Kennedy asked the jury to keep trying to reach verdicts on 42 other counts in deliberations that have now lasted longer than the trial.
The case involving the modest 2½-square-mile Los Angeles suburb has become a national symbol of political greed. Authorities allege a salary-inflating scheme that drove the city to the brink of bankruptcy was masterminded by former City Manager Robert Rizzo, who is expected to go on trial with his former assistant on similar charges later this year.
The note from the juror, who asked to remain anonymous, referred to a verdict related to one of the municipal boards that prosecutors said was created by the officials to help boost their salaries.
"I have been debating in my own mind that due to the pressure and stress of the deliberation process the jury may have given an improper verdict on the Solid Waste Authority," the note said. "It is better to be certain beyond a reasonable doubt to give a verdict of guilty than send someone innocent to prosecution."
In a separate note sent Wednesday, a different juror, identified as No. 10, said she thought the panel was straying from the judge's instructions.
Defense attorneys argued Thursday that the notes might indicate there is misconduct in deliberations.
"There may be horse-trading to give up one verdict to get another," said attorney Alex Kessel, who represents former Councilman George Mirabal.
Kennedy said pressure is placed on juries in all cases.
"That is not tantamount to misconduct," she said.
Defense attorneys also questioned whether Kennedy's jury instructions were prejudicial to their clients.
At one point, attorney Ron Kaye, who represents ex-Councilman George Cole, suggested jurors hear more evidence about the case, drawing an angry rebuke from the judge.
"You are not going to reopen evidence," she said. "That is not provided. No!"
Former Mayor Oscar Hernandez and former City Council members Teresa Jacobo and Mirabal were each convicted of five counts of misappropriating public funds. Former Councilman Victor Bello was convicted of four counts and former Councilman Cole of two.
Prosecutors declined to say what sentences they could face until the other charges are resolved.
Former Councilman Luis Artiga was acquitted of all 12 counts filed against him.
The convictions were the first to come after revelations more than a year ago that Bell's leadership had illegally raised taxes, business license fees and other sources of income to pay huge salaries to the city manager, police chief, City Council members and others.
The six former City Council members were each paid about $100,000 a year.
Following the three-week trial, deliberations began on Feb. 21 and had gone on for only four days when one juror was replaced for misconduct and the panel was ordered to start over. The new group was in its 20th day of deliberations on Thursday.
The convictions all related to the defendants being paid for sitting on Bell's Solid Waste and Recycling Authority, an entity they could not prove had been legally established or did any work.
Records show the authority met only one time between 2006 and 2010 and there was no evidence any waste was ever collected or recycled.
Many of the still unresolved charges relate to the council members' work on other agencies that prosecutors also say were created only to help boost their salaries.
The defendants, many of whom took the witness stand during the trial, insisted they earned those salaries by working around the clock to help residents. They and their lawyers blamed Rizzo for creating the fiscal mess in Bell.
The city of 36,000 residents, where one in four people live below the poverty line, was threatened with bankruptcy after the state controller ordered that the illegally collected taxes, license fees and other revenue be repaid.