France supports Netanyahu arrest warrant in break with Western allies

ICC said it had evidence to charge Benjamin Netanyahu with crimes against humanity
The ICC said it had evidence to charge Benjamin Netanyahu with crimes against humanity - ABIR SULTAN/AFP
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

France has backed the International Criminal Court’s application for arrest warrants against Israeli officials, in stark contrast to British and American disapproval.

The ICC said it had evidence to charge Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, and Yoav Gallant, his defence minister, with crimes against humanity, including using starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza. It also applied for the arrest of Hamas leaders on charges including torture and taking hostages.

France said it supported the ICC’s “independence and the fight against impunity in all situations”.

The foreign ministry “condemned the anti-Semitic massacres perpetrated by Hamas” during the attack on Israel on Oct 7, which was “accompanied by acts of torture and sexual violence”.

It said it had warned Israel “of the need for strict compliance with international humanitarian law, and in particular of the unacceptable level of civilian casualties in the Gaza Strip and inadequate humanitarian access”.

Belgium and Slovenia also backed the move.

But Britain, America, Italy and the Czech Republic were among those who criticised the court’s decision.

Rishi Sunak described the application for arrest warrants as “deeply unhelpful”.

Speaking in Vienna, the Prime Minister said that it would make no difference to getting aid into Gaza and reaching a sustainable ceasefire.

Rishi Sunak said the ICC's arrest warrants would not help the aid effort or bring a ceasefire to fruition
Rishi Sunak said the ICC's arrest warrants would not help the aid effort or bring a ceasefire to fruition - ANADOLU

“This is a deeply unhelpful development,” Mr Sunak said. “Of course, it is still subject to a final decision, but it remains deeply unhelpful nonetheless.”

“There is no moral equivalence between a democratic state exercising its lawful right to self-defence and the terrorist group Hamas. It is wrong to conflate and equivocate between those two different entities.”

The Prime Minister’s remarks echoed those of Joe Biden, who condemned the ICC’s effort to seek the arrest of Mr Netanyahu as “outrageous”.

Unlike Israel and the United States, the UK Government is a signatory to the ICC and would be obliged to respect any warrant should its subject visit Britain.

David Cameron, the Foreign Secretary, said that the ICC drawing a parallel between Israel and Hamas was “plain wrong”.

“Frankly I think this was a mistake in terms of position, in terms of timing, in terms of effect,” he said.

‘Other dominoes will fall’

Michael Gove, the cabinet minister, also slammed the decision, accusing the ICC’s chief prosecutor of seeking “to hold Israel to standards that we don’t hold other countries to”.

“You cannot equate Israel with Hamas,” he told Times Radio. “Hamas is a terrorist organisation, bent on slaughter. Israel is a state like all states: an imperfect one, but one that’s trying to defend its people, and trying to equate the two is just nonsensical.”

Speaking later at the JW3 Jewish Community Centre in north-west London he warned, “there can be no equivalence between them. And that moral position, I think, has to guide our response to the legal operation of the ICC”.

Mr Gove added that Russia, Iran and China were seeking to spread “anti-Semitic and anti-Israel narratives”.

“They know that if they undermine Israel, other dominoes will fall,” he said.

Germany both praised the ICC as a “fundamental achievement of the international community” and hit out at the “inaccurate impression of an equivalence” between Israel and Hamas.

An Israeli government spokesman on Tuesday urged the “civilised world” to unite against the ICC.

Benjamin Netanyahu, left, and Youv Gallant, right, face allegations of 'wilful killing, starvation and murder'
Benjamin Netanyahu, left, and Youv Gallant, right, face allegations of 'wilful killing, starvation and murder' - POOL/REUTERS

Karim Khan, the ICC prosecutor, said on Monday he had applied for arrest warrants for Mr Netanyahu and Mr Gallant for crimes including “wilful killing”, “extermination and/or murder”, and “starvation” during the war in Gaza.

He said Israel had committed “crimes against humanity” and accused it “of a widespread and systematic attack against the Palestinian civilian population”.

Mr Khan also said Hamas leaders, including Qatar-based Ismail Haniyeh and Yahya Sinwar, the Gazan chief, “bear criminal responsibility” for actions committed during the Oct 7 attack.

These included “taking hostages”, “rape and other acts of sexual violence” and “torture”, he said.

“International law and the laws of armed conflict apply to all,” Mr Khan said. “No foot soldier, no commander, no civilian leader, no one, can act with impunity.”

On Tuesday night, the ICC announced that one of the judges who will consider the arrest warrant had recused herself over impartiality concerns.

Judge Maria del Socorro Flores Liera, who was set to rule on the arrest warrant, is married to Miguel Ruiz Cabañas, the Mexican human rights minister.

The court noted that in January, Mexico backed Palestine’s referral over the war in Gaza in a separate case. Mexico has recognised the state of Palestine since 2012.

In a statement, the court said Ms Flores Liera’s marriage “could affect [her] appearance of impartiality”.

The ICC said: “While expressly noting that no issues arose in respect of any actual lack of impartiality on the part of Judge Flores, the presidency considered that the existence of a spousal relationship with a high-level government official of the ministry of foreign affairs of a state’s party involved in the referral of a situation to the office of the prosecutor was sufficient to create the potential appearance of a lack of impartiality.”

Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 3 months with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.