Fallout from suspected spy balloon kills 'huge propaganda win' for China

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Until it was shot down it appeared to be peacefully floating across American airspace. But on the ground the suspected use of a spy balloon triggered a diplomatic maelstrom, and experts say it has undermined efforts to repair relations between the U.S. and China.

“This incident is incredibly embarrassing for Beijing. It reinforces concerns that most Western nations justifiably harbor about China’s great power ambitions,” Craig Singleton, a senior China fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington, D.C., think tank and lobbying organization, told NBC News on Saturday.

He added that Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s decision on Friday to indefinitely postpone his visit to China had defeated what would have been a “huge propaganda win” for Beijing, “in essence signaling that America has dispatched its top envoy to China and not the other way round.”

Blinken, who had been scheduled to depart Washington for Beijing Monday, said he had told senior Chinese diplomat Wang Yi in a phone call Friday that sending the balloon over the U.S. was “an irresponsible act and that (China’s) decision to take this action on the eve of my visit is detrimental to the substantive discussions that we were prepared to have.” Blinken's visit would have been the first to China by a U.S. secretary of state since 2018.

Now “Chinese officials are finding themselves in damage control mode,” Singleton said.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken speaks in Chicago (Kamil Krzaczynski / AFP via Getty Images file)
Secretary of State Antony Blinken speaks in Chicago (Kamil Krzaczynski / AFP via Getty Images file)

First spotted over Montana, which is home to one of America’s three nuclear missile silo fields at Malmstrom Air Force Base, the massive white orb, which is about the size of three school buses, has been heading southeastward over Kansas and Missouri at 60,000 feet.

Describing it as a “high-altitude surveillance balloon,” Pentagon spokesperson Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder said Thursday that the “government acted immediately to protect against the collection of sensitive information.” Asked why the U.S. did not shoot down the balloon, Ryder said the government had ruled it out because of the “potential for debris and property damage” to people and structures on the ground.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters Friday that the U.S. had actually been tracking the balloon since at least Tuesday, when President Joe Biden was first briefed.

Biden said Saturday that the U.S. was “gonna take care of it” and later U.S. officials later said it had been downed off the South Carolina coast.

By then curiosity about it had swept the nation. Fuzzy videos have been posted to social media and search phrases like “where is the spy balloon now?” and “spy balloon tracker” have been trending on Google.

China’s Foreign Ministry admitted the balloon was indeed theirs in a statement Friday but insisted it was “a civilian airship used for research, mainly meteorological purposes.”

In a separate statement Saturday, it said that Wang Yi had spoken with Blinken and they had “communicated on how to deal with accidental incidents in a calm and professional manner.”

The readout came hours after the Pentagon said it had observed another Chinese surveillance balloon flying over Latin America, without providing further details on its location.

Chinese media outlets have also dismissed the claim that the balloon was used for spying, while netizens also mocked the claim on social media.

“This has nothing to do with military reconnaissance or surveillance,” Zhou Bo, a retired senior colonel in the Chinese army and now a senior fellow at the Centre for International Security and Strategy think tank, told NBC News Saturday.

“This is an accident, and we have expressed our regret over this. And I cannot see any reason why the U.S. government should not believe it, except to make a political use of it. So, this should be over,” he added.

A high altitude balloon floats over Billings, Mont., on Feb. 1, 2023. (Larry Mayer / The Billings Gazette via AP file)
A high altitude balloon floats over Billings, Mont., on Feb. 1, 2023. (Larry Mayer / The Billings Gazette via AP file)

Zhao Minghao, a professor at the Institute of International Studies at Shanghai’s Fudan University, said that China’s Foreign Ministry would have made extensive preparations for Blinken’s visit.

“From the perspective of China’s top leadership, they wouldn’t have wanted to disrupt the process of easing relations with the United States because this year is a very important year for China to revive the economy,” he told The Washington Post. “There is no point in China sabotaging the process.”

David Sacks, a research fellow on U.S.-China relations and security at the Council on Foreign Relations agreed that economic discussions would likely have been high on the agenda.

“China was pushing tactically for a thaw in U.S.-China relations in the near term, as it deals with a Covid outbreak and an economic slowdown, and pushback across the region to its more aggressive foreign policy,” he said.

He added that the presence of the balloon was likely a “bureaucratic blunder” with poor timing by the Chinese military, and not a high-stakes move by President Xi Jinping to undermine the U.S. on the eve of Blinken’s visit.

“It was likely unintentional for China to have been flying this mission at this particular point in time,” he said.

While State Department spokesman Ned Price said Friday that Blinken would be prepared to visit Beijing “as soon as conditions allow,” with Republicans demanding answers from the Biden administration about the balloon and arguing that the incident demonstrates that U.S. posture and policies are not deterring China, Singleton said it was unlikely that it would happen soon.

“Overall, the administration was justified in indefinitely postponing the trip. The onus is now on China to explain its actions and ultimately reign in its problematic, irresponsible behavior,” he said. After that, the two sides can potentially meet, so long as that eventual engagement is consistent with the principles of strict reciprocity and it’s in the U.S. national mutual interest.”

This article was originally published on NBCNews.com