• Home
  • Mail
  • Flickr
  • Tumblr
  • News
  • Sports
  • Finance
  • Celebrity
  • Answers
  • Groups
  • Mobile
  • More
Yahoo
    • Skip to Navigation
    • Skip to Main Content
    • Skip to Related Content
    • Mail
    News Home
    Follow Us
    • US
    • World
    • Politics
    • Tech
    • Science
    • Odd News
    • ABC News
    • Yahoo Originals
    • Katie Couric
    • Matt Bai

    End of oil boom threatens Norway's welfare model

    Balazs Koranyi
    ReutersMay 8, 2014
    File photo shows a woman begging for money outside a shop in downtown Bergen, southwestern Norway
    View photos
    A woman begs for money outside a shop in downtown Bergen, southwestern Norway, in this March 21, 2012 file photo. REUTERS/Stoyan Nenov/Files

    By Balazs Koranyi

    OSLO (Reuters) - Norway's energy boom is tailing off years ahead of expectations, exposing an economy unprepared for life after oil and threatening the long-term viability of the world's most generous welfare model.

    High spending within the sector has pushed up wages and other costs to unsustainable levels, not just for the oil and gas industry but for all sectors, and that is now acting as a drag on further energy investment. Norwegian firms outside oil have struggled to pick up the slack in what has been, for at least a decade, almost a single-track economy.

    How Norway handles this "curse of oil" - huge wealth that bring unhealthy dependency in its train - may hold lessons across the North Sea in Scotland, which votes on independence from the United Kingdom later this year, relying at least in part on what it sees as its oil revenues.

    Norway had the foresight to put aside a massive $860 billion rainy-day cash pile, or $170,000 per man, woman and child. It also has huge budget surpluses, a top-notch AAA credit rating and low unemployment, so tangible decline is not imminent.

    But costs have soared, non-oil exporters are struggling, the government is spending $20 billion more oil money this year than in 2007 and the generous welfare model, which depends on a steady flow of oil tax revenue may not be preparing Norwegians for tougher times.

    "In Norway, job security seems to be taken for granted, almost like it's a human right to have a job," says Hans Petter Havdal, CEO of car-parts maker Kongsberg Automotive.

    Kongsberg Automotive has only 5 percent of its workers left in Norway, having moved jobs to places like Mexico, China and the United States, and keeping only high-tech, automated functions at home. It says it is struggling with high labor costs and even problems such as excessive sick leave.

    "It's a bit discouraging that the sick leave in Norway is twice the level of other plants," Havdal said. "That is to me an indication that something is not as it should be."

    With per capita GDP around $100,000, the Norwegian lifestyle has become such that the work week averages less than 33 hours, one of the lowest in the world, and while unemployment is low, there is large underemployment, made possible by benefits.

    In 2012, a new word entered the Norwegian lexicon - to "nave", or live off benefits from welfare agency NAV.

    "Approximately 600,000 Norwegians ... who should be part of the labor force are outside the labor force, because of welfare, pension issues," says Siv Jensen, the finance minister.

    Company executives and some government officials say Norway needs to limit wage increases to productivity, limit oil cost growth, cut taxes like neighbors have done and spend less of the oil money. Some say it should even depreciate its currency.

    The Scottish National Party's argument in favor of independence has centered on the promise that Scotland can replicate the success of Norway's oil economy, creating a sovereign wealth fund for future generations, while public coffers would be only half as dependent on oil and gas.

    Unfortunately for Scotland, the glory days of British hydrocarbon production are already in the past, with North Sea output down around two thirds since its peak.

    A net oil and gas exporter until the turn of the century, Britain will import almost half of its hydrocarbon needs this year, mostly from Norway, rising to two-thirds by 2026, the government has said.

    TURN FOR BIG OIL

    The fortunes of the oil industry, which accounts for a fifth of Norway's economy, have shifted abruptly as the global oil sector slammed on the brakes.

    Costs are spiking and capital spending has been so high that energy firms are selling assets to pay dividends. With oil prices seen falling this year and next, appetite for capital expenditure is low.

    Investments, which tripled over the past decade, are now seen declining in the years ahead, confounding earlier expectations for a steady increase, while oil production remains flat, despite years of heavy spending.

    Energy companies are cutting some of their most innovative projects, a big worry as the sector has relied on cutting edge innovation to offset its high costs.

    The government puts the best face on this, but admits times are changing.

    "The boom is probably over. But we're not looking at a steep decline in investment or production," says oil minister Tord Lien. "The costs are rising too high and too fast. The Norwegian costs have risen a little bit more than elsewhere."

    Shell has called off a multi-billion dollar gas project that was seen as a step towards platform-free offshore production after costs on the pilot project hit seven times the initial estimate. It would have placed all equipment on the seabed, including compression, and would have powered it from the shore, a huge technological step.

    Statoil, the state-owned national champion, has slashed spending, eliminating advanced projects like an Arctic rig that would have been able to operate in two-meter thick ice.

    "Cutting back on capital spending is hurting innovation," says government oil regulator chief Bente Nyland. "When you're cutting back, you're focusing on your production (and) your income ... This will have a long-term impact because you have to make decisions on projects now."

    Norway is the world's seventh biggest oil exporter, and it supplies a fifth of the European Union's gas, a critical position as tensions with Moscow over Ukraine raise concerns about Russian supplies.

    It also boasts the world's highest GDP per hour worked, according to the OECD, but labor productivity has declined since 2007, and since 2000 its unit labor cost has risen around six times faster than in Germany.

    NO GOING BACK

    Handelsbanken economist Knut Anton Mork said Norway must act if it is to avoid decline.

    "The oil boom has ended," Mork said. "Norway needs to rebalance to a more sustainable level, which can be done either through a nominal depreciation or through an internal devaluation of wages.

    "Absent necessary adjustments, Norway after oil may face a structural crisis similar to that in Finland after Nokia."

    Industry-leading mobile handset maker used to account for nearly a fifth of Finland's exports and a quarter of its corporation tax before its rapid decline as rivals cornered the market in smartphones.

    Neighbor Sweden, meanwhile, cut sickness and unemployment benefits and lowered income, wealth and corporate taxes. Its tax burden has fallen by four percentage points of gross domestic product, now making it lower than France.

    But such wage adjustment in Norway is unlikely in the near term, and unions dispute that the country has a competitiveness problem. Industrial workers nearly went on strike in April until last-minute concessions.

    "We haven't been in a situation since the second world war that we had any cutbacks on rights we have negotiated," said Stein-Ragnar Noreng, CEO for consultancy KPMG's Norwegian unit.

    "There is no sign of willingness from unions or the government to go into any kind of discussion. This could be very dangerous because investments will go down."

    Knut Sunde, director of employer interest group Area Trade and Industrial Policy, also sees little chance of much change:

    "It's a high-cost country and will always be, so there's no dreaming about ever coming back to the good old days when Sweden was expensive and Norway was cheap. We'll never go back."

    (Additional reporting by Henrik Stolen in Oslo, Sakari Suoninen in Helsinki and Karolin Schaps in London; Editing by Will Waterman)

    What to Read Next

    • Trump moves to pull US out of big Asia trade deal

      4766 messages7%71%22%
    • White House suggests reporter apologize to Trump over MLK bust correction

      19 messages3%62%35%
    • US sent $221 million to Palestinians in Obama's last hours

      1944 messages4%74%22%
    • #2 of 10 Most Popular News Galleries of 2016: 9/11: Then and now - 15 years later

      964 messages5%57%38%
    • Spicer on Trump receiving Pentagon advice to fight ISIS

      37 messages10%80%10%
    • Man convicted of 3 murders as teen kills himself in prison

      2449 messages11%67%22%
    • SNL Writer Suspended for Controversial Tweet About Donald Trump's Son

      737 messages5%61%34%
    • Christina and Tarek Have Their Biggest Fight Yet on ‘Flip or Flop’

      172 messages4%75%21%
    • #8 of 10 Most Popular News Galleries of 2016: Deadly attack at Istanbul's Ataturk Airport

      933 messages9%15%76%
    • Spicer slams media for coverage of Trump

      57 messages3%63%34%
    • Victim Speaks Out About Lawyer Convicted of Hypnotizing His Clients

      253 messages3%75%22%
    • Trump spokesman says negative coverage is ‘demoralizing’ to Trump

      1574 messages4%60%36%
    • Man Who Filmed HRC Collapse Hailed as "Hero"

      999 messages9%65%26%
    • #10 of 10 Most Popular News Galleries of 2016: Stunning images from the 2016 National Geographic Nature Photographer of the Year contest

      182 messages17%69%14%
    • Spicer responds to report that Trump's people were in first few rows cheering at CIA event

      135 messages5%69%26%
    • Ivanka Trump’s Kids Cause ‘Prince George Effect’ With Custom Clothes

      533 messages13%62%25%

    Trump makes early move on restricting abortions around the world

    Chris: And the republican war on women continues... Why do they hate women so much?

    Join the Conversation
    1 / 5

    1.4k

    • Tiffany Trump Wore the Shoe Brand That’s Suing the Ivanka Trump Label

      581 messages5%71%24%
    • Jesse James Takes a Swipe at Women’s Marchers — and Sandra Bullock?

      2082 messages5%66%29%
    • Protesting the Dakota Access pipeline

      2089 messages4%61%35%
    • White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer briefs the press

      5 messages0%80%20%
    • Kellyanne Conway 'Didn't See the Point' to Women's March on Washington

      9608 messages4%69%27%
    • ‘Morning Joe’ Blasts Trump’s First Day in White House: ‘It Could Not Have Gone Worse’

      1973 messages5%63%32%
    • White House falsely claims recent ‘dramatic expansion of the federal workforce’

      2709 messages3%67%30%
    • Warplanes pound Aleppo – Dozens dead

      1639 messages3%64%33%
    • 'View' Co-Hosts Talk Trump's Inaugural Address

      15 messages6%65%29%
    • Keshia Knight Pulliam Welcomes Daughter Ella Grace

      36 messages7%76%17%
    • Cervical Cancer Is Deadlier Than We Thought — Especially in Black Women

      173 messages4%66%30%
    • Help
    • Privacy
    • Suggestions
    • About our Ads
    • Terms