National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden quipped in a tweet Monday that he won government security clearance “faster than half of this White House.”
Snowden, an NSA contractor who leaked thousands of documents exposing the agency’s global electronic eavesdropping, made the comment in a reply to a tweet by journalist Barton Gellman. Gellman, who has written extensively on the government, privacy and security, noted that it’s “highly unusual” for so many in the Trump administration to be still lacking permanent clearance after this much time. Yet they still have access to sensitive information.
I got a security clearance faster than half of this White House. https://t.co/hYYWy6wHIe— Edward Snowden (@Snowden) February 12, 2018
White House says it’s common for security clearance to take a year.— Barton Gellman (@bartongellman) February 12, 2018
1. It’s not. Unusual, even for Regular Janes and Joes.
2. It verges on Black Swan territory for top-rankers like Kushner & Porter, who cut the line.
3. *May* mean “never” & bureaucracy doesn’t want to say no.
The issue was raised dramatically last week when news emerged that security clearance for White House staff secretary Rob Porter was held up by accusations of domestic violence from both of his ex-wives. Porter quit his White House job last Wednesday. He insists the accusations are unfounded.
Kushner, a top-level adviser to the president, is also apparently a person of interest in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible Trump campaign collusion with Kremlin interference in the U.S. presidential election. He also remains an investor in the Kushner family real estate empire, which has international holdings and investors. In addition, he has amended his financial disclosure forms several times to add information that he had previously omitted.
It’s particularly unusual for someone at Kushner’s level in the White House, who should be on a fast track, to wait more than three months for the permanent security clearance he needs, a source told the Post. “That just tells me that somebody’s uncomfortable with the information that they have in his background,” another source explained to the newspaper.
But a lawyer quoted by the Post, Mark Zaid, who represents government workers going through the process, said it’s not necessarily sinister that so many still lack permanent security clearance. He believes that investigations may be slowed by the fact that more people than usual have never before had clearance, and they also may have have complicated financial holdings with international connections. Zaid wrote the same to Gellman in a tweet.
I'm no fan of Trump WH but this isn't highly unusual. There are more ppl than usual who (1) never had clearance before & (2) have extensive & complicated financial backgrounds & foreign connections. Takes longer. I'd love to prove political manipulation but no evidence so far.— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) February 12, 2018
Democrats have demanded “credible oversight” of the security clearance process. Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), ranking member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, complained in a letter last week to the committee chairman, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), that Democrats have been blocked from important information.
- This article originally appeared on HuffPost.