DES MOINES — More than 2,500 campaign stops. A field that at times topped 20 candidates. And more than 1,600 Iowa Democratic caucus precincts, primed to kick off the 2020 primary season.
And it only took about three hours for it to start crumbling.
The results of the Iowa Democratic caucuses were delayed Monday night, with the state party citing issues with the reporting process that involved three times the results as previous caucuses.
It wasn’t the first time the Iowa caucuses have produced late results, but Monday night’s issues come after months of heightened criticism of the caucus process and calls for Iowa to lose its vaunted first-in-the-nation status.
Here’s what we know and what could happen next:
Why were the results delayed?
The Iowa Democratic Party released a statement Monday night saying there were "inconsistencies" in the three sets of data from precincts: raw votes from the first alignment, raw votes from the final alignment, and the usual state delegate equivalents.
"We found inconsistencies in the reporting of three sets of results," Mandy McClure, communications director for the state party, said in the statement. "In addition to the tech systems being used to tabulate results, we are also using photos of results and a paper trail to validate that all results match and ensure that we have confidence and accuracy in the numbers we report."
At the time of her statement, McClure said the party had data so far from “around 25%” of the state’s 1,765 precincts, adding that “early data indicates turnout is on pace for 2016."
However, a number of precinct leaders reportedly had issues using a new reporting app. Polk County Democratic Chairman Sean Bagniewski told the Des Moines Register that reporting issues "became the norm for the evening."
Polk County is home to Des Moines, Iowa's largest city.
Bagniewski said boxes from nearly all of the county’s 177 precincts were delivered to the county’s offices with written preference cards that spell out how individual caucusgoers aligned in the first and final alignments. He said the results are nearly all in — the county just can’t report them to the state party.
The Iowa Democratic Party, however, insisted that the app did not create delays.
"This is simply a reporting issue; the app did not go down, and this is not a hack or an intrusion," McClure said in another statement later Monday. "The underlying data and paper trail is sound and will simply take time to further report the results."
How did the candidates respond?
Although there were no reported results, several Democratic candidates gave speeches spinning the non-existent results in the best light for themselves.
"I have a strong feeling that at some point the results will be announced," Sen. Bernie Sanders joked with supporters in Des Moines. "And when those results are announced, I have a good feeling we’re going to be doing very, very well here in Iowa."
Former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg gave perhaps the most direct claim to victory, despite the lack of results.
“We don’t know all the results. But we know by the time it’s all said and done, Iowa, you have shocked the nation,” Buttigieg said. “Because, by all indications, we are going on to New Hampshire victorious.”
Former Vice President Joe Biden's also addressed supporters in Des Moines, saying, "It looks like it is going to be a long night, but I'm feeling good."
But Biden's campaign also slammed the process, saying the “considerable flaws” holding up election results demand a complete and speedy answer.
“We appreciate that you plan to brief the campaigns momentarily on these issues, and we plan to participate,” Dana Remus, general counsel for the former vice president’s campaign, wrote in a letter to the party Monday as delays extended into early Tuesday morning. “However, we believe that the campaigns deserve full explanations and relevant information regarding the methods of quality control you are employing, and an opportunity to respond before any official results are released,” the letter said.
What happens next?
In a short conference call with media, Iowa Democratic Party officials early Tuesday said they expect results to be released at some point later in the day.
"The integrity of our process with the results have and always will be our top priority,” Iowa Democratic Party Chairman Troy Price told reporters on the call at 1 a.m. CST. “At this point, the IDP is manually verifying all precinct results. We expect to have numbers to report later today.
“They’re validating every piece of data we have against our paper trail,” he continued. “The system is taking longer than expected, but it’s in place to ensure we are eventually able to report results with full confidence.”
Price said the state party is in contact with the campaigns and will keep them updated.
But Democratic candidates didn't stick around Iowa for the results. Many candidates have already left for the next primary contest in New Hampshire.
'On to New Hampshire': Democratic candidates not waiting for Iowa outcome to give their speeches
What did Trump say?
President Donald Trump's campaign quickly criticized the delay, calling it the "sloppiest train wreck in history."
"Democrats are stewing in a caucus mess of their own creation with the sloppiest train wreck in history," Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale said in an emailed statement, adding that there were concerns about "the fairness of the process."
Parscale also touted Trump's early and easy victory in the Republican caucuses, which was announced about 30 minutes after the caucuses began.
"Tonight, President Trump posted a record performance in the well-run GOP Iowa caucuses with record turnout for an incumbent," he said.
Contributing: Courtney Subramanian, John Fritze, Ledyard King, Maureen Groppe of USA TODAY; Lee Rood, Jason Clayworth and Brianne Pfannenstiel of the Des Moines Register
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Iowa caucus results: What to know about the Iowa caucus results delay