The army Putin spent 2 decades building has been largely destroyed in Ukraine, and Russia's 'strategic defeat' could threaten his grip on power

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Russia's military will have to be rebuilt because of the war in Ukraine, experts say.

  • The war has dramatically altered perceptions of Russia's military strength, one expert told Insider.

  • Putin's grip on power may now be in jeopardy as he faces rare instances of dissent.

Over the roughly two decades that Russian President Vladimir Putin has been in power, he's dedicated a lot of time and money to building up and modernizing Russia's military. In the process, Putin had garnered a reputation as a force to be reckoned with and was widely viewed as one of the most powerful world leaders.

But the war in Ukraine has decimated the Russian military that Putin spent years building, while raising questions about his grip on power, Russia experts and military analysts told Insider.

"Russia's invasion of Ukraine has been a strategic defeat. So far, the Kremlin has not been able to achieve its strategic-level objectives, and it has incurred significant costs. Russia's military is going to have to be rebuilt," George Barros, a military analyst at the Institute for the Study of War, told Insider.

"The conventional ground army, ground force, that the Kremlin has spent the last two decades on creating — seeking to create a modern military — that force has been just largely degraded and in a large part destroyed in the past six months of war in Ukraine," Barros added. "It's very true to say that the conventional Russian ground force has taken a significant beating in Ukraine. It will have to be rebuilt."

While it's difficult to confirm death tolls with the fighting ongoing, US military estimates last month put Russian casualties as high as 80,000. Among the dead have been senior officers, including generals.

Barros said it would likely take "a generation to recreate" the Russian officer corps, which is "definitely going to have a long-term strategic impact on the net assessment for Russia's conventional military."

While Putin has avoided declaring a general mobilization to make up for significant troop losses in Ukraine, the Russian leader last month ordered the military to increase its ranks by 137,000 starting in 2023, an ambitious goal seen by some as unachievable and one of many signs that the Russian military is being hollowed out by the war in Ukraine.

A recent intelligence update from the British Defense Ministry said the elite 1st Guards Tank Army and other Western Military District units had suffered heavy casualties, adding that indicated "Russia's conventional force designed to counter NATO is severely weakened." The ministry added: "It will likely take years for Russia to rebuild this capability."

The Russian military has also seen the damage, destruction, and abandonment of astonishing amounts of equipment in Ukraine. It is estimated to have lost thousands of armored vehicles since the war began in late February. These losses have forced the Russian military to resort to pulling obsolete Soviet-era equipment, such as T-62 tanks, out of storage.

A destroyed Russian main battle tank rusts next to the main highway into the city on May 20, 2022 in Kyiv, Ukraine
A destroyed Russian tank on May 20 in Kyiv, Ukraine.Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

'Not nearly as powerful as we thought'

Russia's military has generally been ranked as the second most powerful in the world — surpassed only by the US.

But Russia's disastrous performance in the Ukraine war is "going to change the assessment of Russia's military strength dramatically," Robert Orttung, a professor of international affairs at George Washington University whose research focuses on Russia and Ukraine, told Insider.

The Russian military is "not nearly as powerful as we thought it was," he said.

A few years ago, Russia appeared to be winning the war in Syria, and "Russian strategy seemed to be outsmarting Western strategy in the Middle East," Orttung said, adding that it provided a major boost to Moscow's propaganda about its military strength.

"A lot of their ability to make their propaganda effective was based on their actual battlefield prowess, which seemed to be quite strong in place like Syria," Orttung said. "Now, basically unable to achieve their goals, unable to show that there's integration between the guys fighting on the ground, the air force, and the other units — it's definitely going to knock them down. The fact that they haven't been winning in the field is going to make their propaganda much less effective."

Before the invasion began, Russia was expected to conquer Kyiv in a matter of days. But Ukrainian forces, with the help of Western-supplied military equipment, put up a far stiffer resistance than Moscow anticipated. Russia's forces failed to take the Ukrainian capital and instead turned their attention to the eastern Donbas region.

Though a war has raged in that region between Kremlin-backed rebels and Ukrainian forces since 2014 — the same year that Russia invaded Ukraine and annexed Crimea — Russia made only gradual progress in its campaign to take over the Donbas.

Ukraine launched a counteroffensive in recent days, pushing the Russian forces into retreat and retaking an astonishing amount of territory in the country's south and east. The Ukrainian government said its forces had recaptured about 3,000 square miles in September so far.

Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with Russian consumer rights watchdog Rospotrebnadzor head Anna Popova at the Kremlin in Moscow on September 14, 2022.
Putin on September Wednesday.GAVRIIL GRIGOROV/SPUTNIK/AFP via Getty Images

'Wouldn't write off Putin now'

Between devastating troop losses and Russia's forces being on the run, Putin is in an increasingly precarious position.

"Strength is the only source of Putin's legitimacy," Abbas Gallyamov, a former speechwriter for Putin, told The New York Times. "And in a situation in which it turns out that he has no strength, his legitimacy will start dropping toward zero."

Gallyamov told The Times that if Ukrainian forces "continue to destroy the Russian army as actively as they are now," it could "accelerate" calls from elites for Putin's successor to be chosen.

Some Russia watchers now believe Putin's grip on power is in jeopardy. Michael McFaul, a former US ambassador to Russia, on Wednesday tweeted: "Putin overreached in Ukraine. It's the beginning of the end for Putinism in Russia."

Local Russian lawmakers are calling for Putin to be removed from power because of the Ukraine war, taking the fatal risk of openly criticizing a leader with a reputation for ruthlessly squashing dissent. Even the Kremlin's propagandists on Russian state media are struggling to continue offering positive assessments of how the war is going.

"You're starting to see rumblings — both on TV and at the local grassroots level — of discontent with his leadership and a realization that the war is not going in Russia's favor," Orttung said. Taken together, Orttung said these developments raised questions on Putin's "image among the people and his ability to exert that image of competence."

Despite such challenges, and the damage done to perceptions of Russia's strength, Orttung is not convinced that this is the end for Putin.

"I wouldn't write off Putin now. A lot of people, including me, have been predicting he's going to leave power or his demise is imminent. But he does have a lot of strengths — the main strength being that he's eliminated any possible, reputable alternative to him," he said.

"It's not clear who would replace him and all the people around him — they depend on him being in power for their own power. They have a stake in him staying there. And he survived more than 22 years fighting in a quite difficult environment, which is the Russian political scene," Orttung added, adding: "Most of the elites think that they're probably better off with Putin there."

Read the original article on Business Insider