'Doctor Who' And The Sheer Power Of Women-Led Sci-Fi Franchises

Katherine Brooks
Updated
(Photo: HULU Alamy BBC Getty Images Warner Brothers)
(Photo: HULU Alamy BBC Getty Images Warner Brothers)

After 12 versions of a male-centric “Doctor Who,” BBC delivered some franchise-defying news this week: The show’s 13th leading Time Lord is a woman.

The response to Jodie Whittaker’s casting has been overwhelming. For a series that regularly switches out its central, quasi-immortal character for a new leading actor every few years or so, a certain amount of fandom ferocity was expected. But Whittaker’s announcement was different, because come December, she will be the 50-year-old franchise’s first female lead.

As expected, a certain amount of “furious sexist backlash” greeted Whittaker’s casting, as some uneasy fans balked at the prospect of a long-running male hero suddenly becoming a female one. (Never mind that the Doctor protagonist has switched physical identities a dozen times before this, or that the show itself reflects a fantasy, alien world with far more unbelievable scenarios.) Louder than the detractors, though, was a flood of genuinely ecstatic fans overjoyed by the series’ decision to shunt the usual casting type in favor of a bolder, history-defining decision. Videos of young girls screaming with joy upon seeing Whittaker’s face in BBC promos quickly went viral.

And it wasn’t just young girls who seemed genuinely enlivened by the announcement. Overall, “Doctor Who” ratings had been slipping under star Peter Capaldi, the 12th white man to take on the decades-old hero. A jolt of electricity had seemed necessary for some time. The best way to create one was to introduce something new into the “Who” series ― something guaranteed to satisfy a horde of followers waiting on the edge of their seats for a new anything to complicate their vastly interconnected sci-fi universe. But those young girls’ reactions bottled up the purest kind of response to Whittaker’s casting: After over 800 episodes filled with a male Doctor saving the world, we’re finally going to see a woman ― hailed as more clever than any being in existence, heretofore undefeated against all adversaries, infused with a kind of confidence that only comes with lifetimes of experience ― reigning supreme on the BBC.

When Rey (Daisy Ridley) first grabbed a lightsaber in “Star Wars: The Force Awakens,” unabashedly charging at Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) with a weapon viewers had seen only in the hands of men for years, fans watching felt similarly. When Wonder Woman (Gal Gadot) catapulted herself through a glass window having just finished cleaning up an entire fight scene on her own, superhero fans used to seeing men commanding battles felt similarly. When ghostbuster Jillian Holtzmann (Kate McKinnon) licked her gun before literally whipping a crowd of destructive ghosts into submission, fans felt similarly. Science fiction and fantasy are built on these kinds of fan reflexes: immersed in a story so far-fetched and extraordinary, we explode with goosebumps, butterflies and tears when moments of unmistakable humanity appear abruptly before us. We’re mesmerized by stories of limitless imagination, by the notion that anything is possible, but we’re often tethered to them by their characters, especially the ones that remind us of ourselves and our place in the world.

For decades, it’s been easier for straight, white men to find those characters, as Lukes and Captain Americas and Peter Venkmans stood at the center of profound scenes. When Whittaker brought down her hood to reveal the new face of “Doctor Who,” some women experienced that connection, too. Sci-fi and fantasy have surely had their fair shares of female characters before them (from “Alien” to “X-Files” to “Star Trek” to “Buffy”), but TV shows and movies like “Doctor Who,” “Star Wars,” “Wonder Women” and “Ghostbusters” are lately giving us something relatively new, if not under-explored until now: women-led sci-fi franchises.

When the trailer for Ava DuVernay’s “A Wrinkle in Time” debuted ― the same weekend as Whittaker’s casting announcement ― women, particularly women of color, had another reason to scream for joy. DuVernay took a familiar story, Madeleine L’Engle’s 1960s book about a young girl on an interplanetary adventure, and cast characters coded white in the source material as women of color ― Oprah Winfrey, Mindy Kaling, Storm Reid. “My whole process with this film was, what if?” the director told EW. “With these women, I wondered, could we make them women of different ages, body types, races? Could we bring in culture, bring in history in their costumes? And in the women themselves, could we just reflect a fuller breadth of femininity?” She has, if the movie turns into a franchise, four more adaptable L’Engle books in the series to explore this goal.

DuVernay’s focus on “what if” embraces so perfectly the potential for innovation built right into fantasy. It’s one of the elements that drives fans back to the genre, this idea that a boundless universe can help us explore questions reality has yet to answer. (One need only look at how effective Hulu’s women-led “Handmaid’s Tale” has been at driving the concept “what if” closer to the concept of “what now.”) But beyond that, DuVernay recognizes the power of humanity. She recognizes that representation ― the simple idea that every fan deserves to see themselves in characters on screen ― only deepens the connections people form with stories, which make up the very foundation upon which fandom is built.

Calls for expanded representation (including those for queer, trans, disabled people) are, in the end, just appeals to the boundaries of fandom: Let us in. We’ve been watching from the edges for a while now, but we’d like to fall into a world, headfirst and headstrong, the way you can. What you see as a continuity error, a divergence from canon that quakes your understanding of a fictional world, we see as a doorway in, something that you’ve had access to for years.

Whittaker’s casting, like Reid’s and Ridley’s and Gadot’s and McKinnon’s, is a doorway in. There should be more.

(Photo: HuffPost)
(Photo: HuffPost)

You can be highbrow. You can be lowbrow. But can you ever just be brow? Welcome to Middlebrow, a weekly examination of pop culture. Read more here.

Love HuffPost? Become a founding member of HuffPost Plus today.

Also on HuffPost:

If there’s anything we sci-fi fans relish, it’s a good end-of-the-world plot. Chaos induced by a worldwide flu-like epidemic? Sign us up! Massive asteroid? Sure! Stephenson’s take on the apocalypse focuses more on how humanity would respond politically, making for an epic volume worth embarking on. A few survivors remain after the world as we know it ends, and they form seven disparate societies, comprised of seven distant races. For 5,000 years, these groups form their own new traditions. Stephenson’s story centers on the moment in their histories when they finally return to Earth.
Like Millhauser, Link humorously fuses the real with the imagined, skirting the line between the two. But, while Millhauser is chiefly concerned with collective responses to strange phenomena, Link’s stories are more personal and psychological -- she throws the reader head-first into her weird worlds, peopled with ghost hunters and evil twins.
Like Millhauser, Link humorously fuses the real with the imagined, skirting the line between the two. But, while Millhauser is chiefly concerned with collective responses to strange phenomena, Link’s stories are more personal and psychological -- she throws the reader head-first into her weird worlds, peopled with ghost hunters and evil twins.
Readers who enjoyed Divergent, or who’ve taken the Myers-Briggs personality test more times than necessary, will relate to Robert Charles Wilson’s latest novel, which divides all of humanity into 21 faction-like sectors based on both personal and social preferences. The process of being placed into an affinity is a little more involved than putting on a sorting hat, and because there are so many options, each affinity is tailored perfectly to its members’ interests. Sounds ideal, right? Nope. Naturally, the affinities begin to take issue with one another, and war looms on the horizon.
Liu’s another decorated science-fiction writer. His bevy of Hugo and Nebula awards speak to his world-crafting abilities, on full display in this first book of a new trilogy. Those looking to fill the void left by maddening wait times between Game of Thrones books can occupy themselves with this fantasy novel centering on political relationships in a world comprised of evil emperors and deceitful gods.
Ned Beauman’s book takes its name from the hottest new recreational drug, which is less innocuous than it may seem; it very well may be the side effect of a corporate conspiracy responsible for missing citizens and bizarre animal behavior. Raf, a 20-something with time on his hands no thanks to a sleeping disorder, stumbles into the throes of pharmaceutical mayhem, falling in love along the way.
Jesse Ball’s book is another that’s tough to classify. The premise -- a government agency that clears citizens’ minds upon request, sending them through a detailed treatment built to recover from trauma -- is science-fiction in the way that “Eternal Sunshine” is. Ball relies on mythical technologies to tell a story that is, at its heart, a romance tarnished by tragedy. In doing so he raises questions about the value of memories, both pleasant and painful, as tools to shape who we are.
Like Ishiguro’s novel, Millhauser’s short stories aren’t squarely science fiction, but they are peopled with phantoms, mermaids and other mythical creatures. Also like Ishiguro, Millhauser is attempting to characterize hard-to-define social phenomena by personifying town gossip and rituals. A man buys a strange surface cleaner from a door-to-door salesman and soon becomes transfixed with his reflection when viewed through newly polished mirrors. A mermaid washes ashore in a small town, sparking a new fashion trend among citizens. Millhauser’s wry humor adds a layer of cheeky self-awareness to the “X-Files”-like events he relates.
A contemporary sci-fi stalwart, Delany’s won a bunch of Hugo and Nebula Awards. This collection jumps back to his earliest works and runs the gamut of sci-fi and fantasy themes. In They Fly at Çiron, a society of winged, god-like humanoids watch over warring villages in a story that could’ve been plucked straight from Greek mythology. In The Ballad of Beta-2, a “Star Trek”-like mission goes awry, and a budding academic tries to make sense of it all. There’s something for everyone in Delany’s collection of short novels.
Of Alan Turing’s myriad contributions to computer science, his test for differentiating between human speakers and computers programmed to speak like humans is probably discussed the most. It’s a fun philosophical question: what about our use of language makes us human? And, if a computer were to pass Turing’s test, what would this imply about the value of interpersonal communication? Louisa Hall brushes against these questions in her subtle saga Speak, which spans centuries of humans attempting to communicate with one another, hoping their messages don’t get lost in translation. Turing features as a cast member, as he pens letters to distant relation. He’s joined by a Silicon Valley tech bro and a Puritan woman traveling to America, in a narrative that attempts to explain what we talk about when we talk about talking.
The breath of an aging dragon casts a spell on a row of Arthurian villages, and their residents can’t seem to recall the details of their own history. In an attempt to relearn their past and find their missing son, an old couple sets off on a journey where they run into valiant knights, mad dogs and a mysterious boatman who carries the sick and dying to a peaceful, nearby island. Less science-fiction oriented than Ishiguro’s past books, the novel nevertheless wields fantastical elements on a quest to understand the function of collective, societal memories.

This article originally appeared on HuffPost.