6 Agencies Were Investigating Trump's Russia Connections Before the Dossier

Photo credit: Timothy A. Clary / Getty
Photo credit: Timothy A. Clary / Getty

From Esquire

Remember how the whole thing about the connections between the Russia and the campaign of El Caudillo del Mar-A-Lago was just all about a renegade British spy turned oppo worker? Yeah, that's not so much anymore-at least not if the crew at McClatchy News are right about this.

The informal, inter-agency working group began to explore possible Russian interference last spring, long before the FBI received information from a former British spy hired to develop politically damaging and unverified research about Trump, according to the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the inquiry…A key mission of the six-agency group has been to examine who financed the email hacks of the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. The London-based transparency group WikiLeaks released the emails last summer and in October. The working group is scrutinizing the activities of a few Americans who were affiliated with Trump's campaign or his business empire and of multiple individuals from Russia and other former Soviet nations who had similar connections, the sources said. U.S. intelligence agencies not only have been unanimous in blaming Russia for the hacking of Democrats' computers but also have concluded that the leaking and dissemination of thousands of emails of top Democrats, some of which caused headaches for the Clinton campaign, were done to help Trump win.

This is not about the famous "dossier," a spurious word tossed around that did not accurately describe what were in essence a series of updated memos from the British spy. This describes an ongoing investigation into connections between the Trump campaign and the Russian international ratfcking apparatus going back even before the president-elect had clinched his party's nomination.

[contentlinks align="center" textonly="false" numbered="false" headline="Related%20Story" customtitles="What%20Did%20Democrats%20Just%20Learn%20from%20James%20Comey?" customimages="" content="article.52286"]

Now, dots are being connected in the most interesting ways.

For months, Trump has voiced positive sentiments toward Putin. In early January, he tweeted that "only 'stupid' people, or fools" would think it's bad to have good relations with Russia. "When I am President, Russia will respect us far more than they do now and both countries will, perhaps, work together to solve some of the many great and pressing problems and issues of the WORLD!" he tweeted last week. During the campaign in July, he displayed ignorance that Russian-backed separatists had invaded Crimea in eastern Ukraine in 2014 and he called on Russia to hack away to uncover thousands of emails that Clinton had never made public after using a private server while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. At the Republican National Convention in Cleveland last July, Trump's campaign associates successfully changed the Republican Party's platform to weaken a provision advocating more military support for the Ukrainian government in its fight to defend itself against the Russian-backed incursionin Crimea.

I recognize the chaos that would erupt if we didn't inaugurate the guy, but right now, it's amazing to me that we're even thinking of doing it. Future historians are going to be amazed as well, I fear.

Respond to this post on the Esquire Politics Facebook page.

You Might Also Like