India sees itself as a country on the rise, but stubborn obstacles — including endemic corruption and political gridlock — suggest that it might fall short of its promise
“As Victor Hugo once said, ‘No power on earth can stop an idea whose time has come.' I suggest to this august house that the emergence of India as a major economic power in the world happens to be one such idea." With those words to the Indian parliament in 1991, then-Finance Minister Manmohan Singh introduced a raft of reforms that loosened his government's stranglehold over the market and sparked years of economic growth that lifted millions out of poverty. Singh, a soft-spoken technocrat, built on those reforms after becoming prime minister in 2004, and until only recently it was a given that India "was on an inexorable road to becoming a global power," says Simon Denyer at The Washington Post. But since winning a second term in 2009, Singh's fortunes have turned — and there are serious doubts that his country, the world's largest democracy, can fulfill its potential. Here, 5 signs India may not become an economic power:
1. The economy is slowing
India's economy grew at a rate of 5.5 percent in the latest quarter, a marked slowdown from the blistering 10 percent pace it was setting a couple of years ago. While most countries — including the U.S. — could only dream of a 5.5 percent rate, India "needs to stay on a high-growth path to pull hundreds of millions" of people who remain in poverty, says Krista Mahr at Time. Two-thirds of India's 1.2 billion people live on less than $2 a day, and more than 500 million Indians are under the age of 25, meaning the government "needs to figure out how to guarantee those millions a future of long, gainful employment," says Mahr. If the economy continues to lumber along, those millions in poverty could begin to strain the country's resources and prevent a jump to greater prosperity.
Corruption is rampant in India, from the top echelons of government to the local police demanding bribes, and many Indians feel that "political parties and their representatives are nothing more than obstacles to doing business," says Erich Follath at Der Spiegel. Singh's government has been wracked by corruption scandals, with opponents accusing officials in his Congress Party of giving sweet deals to politically connected corporations in the telecommunications and coal industries, which ended up costing the government tens of billions of dollars in revenue. The penchant for corruption is a turnoff for foreign companies, and even aid programs for the poor have been hijacked. "On the long road between greedy politicians in New Delhi and corrupt local officials, the money tends to disappear before it reaches the poor," says Follath.
3. Political paralysis
Opposition parties in recent weeks have been hammering Singh over the coal scandal, suspending all parliamentary activity for days running. Similar paralysis accompanied outrage over the telecommunications scandal. In addition, Singh barely has control over his own coalition, which represents "interests from many corners of the vast country" and "has grown particularly unwieldy," says Kahr. With tensions running high, little business has been done since Singh's second term began.
4. Reform has stalled
With the corruption scandals and parliamentary gridlock, the government has failed to pass far-reaching reforms that are considered necessary to catapult India to the next stage of development, such as ending wasteful subsidies and reducing barriers to foreign investment. "It's very clear that it is misgovernance that is holding India back from realizing its potential and blunting its competitive edge," says FirstPost in an editorial. India is falling farther and farther behind in basic areas that need to be improved: "Transport, communication, and energy." The country received a stark reminder of that earlier this summer, when a massive electrical blackout left 700 million people without power.
5. Singh hasn't come through
Singh, who was "once so eager to bring about reform, seems exhausted and tired of his position," says Follath. He has refused to "stick his neck out on reforms that will continue the process of liberalization he helped start," says Kahr. And while he has not been accused of corruption himself, he has steadily developed a reputation as "a dithering, ineffectual bureaucrat presiding over a deeply corrupt government," says Denyer. If he doesn't turn things around soon, Singh "is in danger of going down in history as a failure."
Other stories from this section:
- Should Ikea get into the hotel business?
- Can J.Crew find success in China?
- Why are Germans still using the deutsche mark?