4 things we learned about plastic straw bans from people with disabilities
There is a debate taking place online in reaction to the plastic straw bans spreading across the U.S., Canada, and Europe.
As various cities and companies ban plastic straws, advocates for people with disabilities have taken to social media to voice their opposition. First Vancouver in May, then Seattle earlier this month, and now Starbucks, McDonalds, and American Airlines have created laws or policies limiting plastic straws.
Just this weekend, advocates canceled a protest planned in front of a New York City Starbucks after speaking with a company official about its ban. Starbucks announced on Friday that straws would be available for customers who ask, but did not confirm they would be plastic — a sticking point for advocates who feel like Starbucks isn't compromising enough.
While many see the ban as a positive way to reduce plastic waste, prohibiting plastic straws may have serious consequences for people with disabilities.
Here are four issues people with disabilities have spotlighted while taking about the ban online.
1. Plastic straws are a necessity for some
"Going without straws can mean struggling through the physical motion of putting a drink to a mouth, or leaking liquid into the lungs, or choking. … For people who need straws, materials other than plastic just don't do the job." https://t.co/dkY2ehn473
— Access Navigators (@Access03801) July 13, 2018
Though plastic straws are a luxury for some, they are a necessity for others. Straws function as an accessibility tool and have historically been used to offer independence for people with disabilities. For this reason, some disability rights advocates have asked for a compromise, which requires businesses to provide plastic straws to those who request them, similar to Starbucks' plan. But that trade-off has some worried that people with disabilities, an already burdened group, will face hardship by being forced to ask.
While Joseph Friedman's original concept came from observing his daughter at a soda fountain, the first targeted sales of the "flex-straw" were to hospitals in 1947. "Bendy straws" are now frequently cited as an early example of #UniversalDesign. #disability #history #straws pic.twitter.com/TRF9okoJRj
— Lawrence Carter-Long (@LCarterLong) July 10, 2018
2. Alternatives have their own problems
Disability rights advocates have been voicing concerns over the limitations of plastic straw alternatives on social media as well. Plastic straws are uniquely designed to avoid burning, choking, or otherwise injuring a person. Plastic alternatives like metal and glass can't be flexed like a bendy straw and paper, especially, can be a choking hazard. Biodegradable alternatives can also be more expensive and harm those with food allergies.
Important considerations in the push to ban single use plastic straws. Alternatives are not effective, safe for disabled people. Something we should all think about and remember diverse voices and opinions absent from some environmental debates. Thanks @WhySharksMatter et al. pic.twitter.com/lULNjNM2NP
— Chris Wall (@coraloha) July 16, 2018
So PUHLEASE, I urge companies and cities to keep my community in mind, and b disability-friendly while continuing to advance towards a more eco-friendly business model. K bye !
— Maheen Ukani (@maheenukani) July 9, 2018
3. Feeling shame
Moreover, people in this community already feel they have been shamed for voicing important concerns about their health. Asking them if they've heard about plastic alternatives can be compared to mansplaining.
How the Great Straw Debate should've gone:
"Ban straws!"
Disabled Folx- "Some of us depend on straws & can't use alternatives. A ban could kill us."
Ableds- "Ah, OK. Ban balloons!"
Instead we got:
"You're just selfish! Don't u care about the planet? Fakers! Try harder!"— Spoonie Warrior ♿ (@spwarriortweets) July 14, 2018
4. Being excluded
In many ways, the straw ban has shed light on the extent to which people with disabilities are excluded from conversations about the very policies that impact them. People with disabilities have said they are also concerned about the environment, but forcing them to choose between environmentalism and their health is inconsiderate. They've also noted that this isn't the only way to reduce plastic waste and encourage lawmakers and business owners to adopt alternative environmentally-friendly policies.
The state of the planet is a mess, and we should be concerned. We should take individual steps to reduce our part in this however we can.
But "can" is a key word here. Some people can do a lot more than others to reduce this.
Where do we start? Money or ability?— Autistic Sinner (@LetsStimTonight) July 15, 2018
“All of this controversy could’ve been avoided if the people making the decisions had just thought to ask actual disabled people about what policies would actually work" https://t.co/3MEpsqpN7S
— Access Navigators (@Access03801) July 14, 2018
So to be honest, I’m just now getting hip to the conversation on the #StrawBan, and I’m very very thankful to the disabled people I follow educating me and all of us as to the shortsightedness of our able-bodied solutions.
Read + learn. I sure did. https://t.co/HKBBwjCVd4— Brittany Packnett (@MsPackyetti) July 15, 2018
Overarching lesson: We need to be better about listening to people with lived experiences different from our own and including them in policy changes that affect their lives.