Want a new Google zip domain? It could be a serious security risk

 Representational image of a cybercriminal
Representational image of a cybercriminal

Google recently unveiled eight new top-level domains (TLDs) designed to inspire fathers (.dad), graduates (.prof, .phd, and .esq), and tech enthusiasts (.foo, .zip, .mov, and .nexus), but at least two of those present a significant cybersecurity risk, experts have warned.

The TLDs in question - .zip and .mov - share their name with common file formats (ZIP archives and video files) that exist outside of the Internet’s four walls, which many cybersecurity experts are calling out for being misleading.

While other similarly vulnerable TLDs have been rolled out in the past, such as .docs, the introduction of two more increase the chances of a scam or phishing attack, giving threat actors more routes.

.zip and .mov TLD risk

A legitimate website with any TLD, including ‘dangerous’ examples like .zip, could include a help section describing the process required to open a zipped file, for example. Should that file be named - in our case, example.zip - a user’s browser may then automatically add a hyperlink because it knows that .zip is a legitimate TLD, even though in our case the page refers to a local file and not a website.

Read more

> These are the best firewall options to stay safe

> Microsoft wants to get more women into cybersecurity

> Microsoft 365 apps are moving to a whole new domain

While the file itself is safe, a threat actor could have already registered a website under that domain in the hope that unsuspecting users click on hyperlinks that lead them to a malicious page that could be the host to malware, phishing attacks, or other scams.

Already, a series of concerning domains have been registered under the new and risky TLDs in the hope that someone, somewhere, has referred to the file name on a web page, which will then be converted to a hyperlink to their malicious site.

While there are some steps that a user can take to be more savvy when it comes to following potentially risky links, some of the responsibility must ultimately fall with Google. The company did not immediately respond to TechRadar Pro’s request for comment.