Tessa Thompson and Chris Hemsworth Will Reunite for Men in Black Spin-Off

In a stroke of genius, Sony Pictures has remembered that Chris Hemsworth was one of the best parts of its maligned 2016 Ghostbusters reboot—and now the studio plans to plunk him into another comedy property, one that should prove that the Australian actor is afraid of neither ghosts nor aliens. Even better? Hemsworth’s Thor: Ragnarok co-star Tessa Thompson is reportedly joining Hemsworth for the project: a 2019 reboot of Men in Black.

Reportedly more “global” in scope, this new installment in the Men in Black franchise will not involve Will Smith or Tommy Lee Jones’s character Agents K or J in any significant way. Presumably, Thompson and Hemsworth will be the new agents on the block.

If Fate of the Furious director F. Gary Gray, who’s at the helm of this new M.I.B., is at all wise, he’ll retain the dynamic that made the first film and (for the most part) its sequels such massive successes. In other words, he’ll need a dour straight man and a loose cannon partner. If the comedy gold of Thor: Ragnarok is the model, then that would make Thompson a solid stand-in for Jones and Hemsworth our Smith-esque wild card.

Sony is also importing even more talent from Marvel Studios in order to ensure Men in Black is a success: screenwriters Matt Holloway and Art Marcum, the duo behind the original Iron Man, will take a crack at the world of secret government organizations and alien invasions. And even if Thompson and Hemsworth wind up being quasi replacements for Jones and Smith, The Hollywood Reporter points out that this new reboot is intended to be “more of an ensemble piece than a two-hander.” So be on the lookout for more talent to join the team—perhaps Mark Ruffalo and Jeff Goldblum are free?

The 2014 Sony hack revealed that the studio was desperately seeking more global franchises. It’s off to a solid start in 2018, with both Peter Rabbit and Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle setting up potential sequels and raking in a surprising amount of money at the box office. Those successes follow closely the much lauded re-launch of the Spider-Man franchise with 2017’s critically acclaimed and highly profitable Homecoming, starring Tom Holland.

That hit, of course, owes a lot to the carefully constructed detente between Marvel Studios and Sony, which arranged shared custody of Peter Parker and an invaluable co-starring role from Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark. With Sony once again plundering the Marvel team in order to re-pair Thompson and Hemsworth, it seems that the studio has truly adopted a new attitude if you can’t beat ’em, copy ’em.

A Chris or Not a Chris?

Almost too hunky to be a Chris, but gets the nod under the wire.

Chris Hemsworth: A Chris

Almost too hunky to be a Chris, but gets the nod under the wire.
by Amber De Vos/Patrick McMullan/Getty Images.
Chris Evans is so Chris that he’s almost trapped by his Chrisness.

Chris Evans: A Chris

Chris Evans is so Chris that he’s almost trapped by his Chrisness.
by Steve Granitz/WireImage.
He is too versatile. He is too unattainable. His chin too delicate and his superhero resume too weak. He is A Ryan.

Ryan Gosling: Not a Chris

He is too versatile. He is too unattainable. His chin too delicate and his superhero resume too weak. He is A Ryan.
by Paul Archuleta/Wireimage.
Though Pine is the most Ryan of the Chrises, he is an original Chris.

Chris Pine: A Chris

Though Pine is the most Ryan of the Chrises, he is an original Chris.
By VALERIE MACON/AFP/Getty Images.
Though officially a Ryan, Ryan Reynold’s Deadpool cred, goofiness, and attainable charm place him squarely in Chris territory.

Ryan Reynolds: A Chris

Though officially a Ryan, Ryan Reynold’s Deadpool cred, goofiness, and attainable charm place him squarely in Chris territory.
by Steve Granitz/WireImage.
His Chris is in the jawline.

Channing Tatum: A Chris

His Chris is in the jawline.
by Jon Kopaloff/FilmMagic.
Hunnam is on the cusp of Chris-dom. Give this man a superhero franchise.

Charlie Hunnam: A Chris

Hunnam is on the cusp of Chris-dom. Give this man a superhero franchise.
by Karwai Tang/WireImage.
Jake is a Ryan.

Jake Gyllenhaal: Not a Chris

Jake is a Ryan.
by Karwai Tang/WireImage.
Krasinski is not a Chris, but a Jim, as in Jim Halpert, his character from The Office. Jims must transcend their cute, goofy, television-centric Jim-ness to become Chris.

John Krasinski: Not a Chris

Krasinski is not a Chris, but a Jim, as in Jim Halpert, his character from The Office. Jims must transcend their cute, goofy, television-centric Jim-ness to become Chris.
by Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images.
Once a Jim, post-Parks and Recreation Chris Pratt now exudes Chris-ness.

Chris Pratt: A Chris

Once a Jim, post-Parks and Recreation Chris Pratt now exudes Chris-ness.
by Samir Hussein/WireImage.
He chose the wrong side of the Chris-topher divide.

Topher Grace: Not a Chris

He chose the wrong side of the Chris-topher divide.
By CHRIS DELMAS/AFP/Getty Images.
Unfortunately, his moment from crossing from a Jim to a Chris has passed. At 43 he is too old to fully Chris.

Chris Messina: Not a Chris

Unfortunately, his moment from crossing from a Jim to a Chris has passed. At 43 he is too old to fully Chris.
by Mike Marsland/WireImage.
Not even close.

Tom Holland: Not a Chris

Not even close.
By Axelle/Bauer-Griffin/FilmMagic.
Not at all.

Christian Bale: Not a Chris

Not at all.
by Jason LaVeris/FilmMagic.
He’s handsome in most Western depictions, mortal, and he saves. A total Chris.

Jesus Christ: A Chris

He’s handsome in most Western depictions, mortal, and he saves. A total Chris.
by VCG Wilson/Corbis/Getty Images.