Again, For the People in the Back: It's Time the Emmys Stop Overlooking Teen Shows

Amanda Prahl
NEVER HAVE I EVER, from left: Maitreyi Ramakrishnan, Lee Rodriguez, Ramona Young, '...had sex with Paxton Hall-Yoshida', (Season 1, ep. 102, aired April 27, 2020). photo: Lara Solanki / Netflix / Courtesy Everett Collection
NEVER HAVE I EVER, from left: Maitreyi Ramakrishnan, Lee Rodriguez, Ramona Young, '...had sex with Paxton Hall-Yoshida', (Season 1, ep. 102, aired April 27, 2020). photo: Lara Solanki / Netflix / Courtesy Everett Collection

While some genres, like sci-fi/fantasy, had a breakthrough with the 2020 Emmy nominations, one genre still got overlooked: teen shows. Even in a year packed with genuinely excellent shows highlighting teenage experiences, only a few nods went to these shows and the people behind them. It's a frustrating trend that, unfortunately, is nothing new.

This year, with one exception, the closest teen shows have come to the Emmys is a handful of nominations in the creative categories. Euphoria and The Politician both snagged a few nominations each in the creative arts categories, and Zendaya managed to break into the best actress category for her leading role in Euphoria. An argument could be made that Stranger Things is sort of a teen show, but since it focuses on its adult characters as much as its preteen and teen characters, it really doesn't count as an example of the genre.

For longtime viewers, this isn't a surprise: the Emmys rarely, if ever, recognize teen shows, and when they do, it's usually in the creative categories, not the marquee nominations. After all, media that is aimed at teenagers (especially teenage girls, who are the main demographic of many of the most popular teen shows) has historically been dismissed as lesser across the board. It happens with movies, it happens with TV, and it especially can be seen in the music industry. Music critic Brodie Lancaster suggested in a 2015 Pitchfork article that an artist's "legitimacy" is often tied to when they leave girl-group or boy-band "hysteria" behind:

"Pop artists earn respect only when they stop appealing to a teen demographic . . . The boy bands and girl groups-not to mention their passionate supporters-that made these artists famous are seemingly only of value when they act as stepping stones to the next, better group of appreciative listeners. Drop the chaste pop songs about unrequited love and hand-holding, they're taught, and they'll move on to the right kind of fans: adults, men. That is how one becomes an artist, right?"

This isn't a new phenomenon, either. The Beatles are, today, hailed as music icons; in their early days, they were dismissed as floppy-haired teen idols until fans other than young women liked them. There's a prevalent idea that the fandom of girls and young women is "hysterical" - that ugly, historically fraught word that suggests in 10 letters that women are less capable of critical, rational thought and therefore can be brushed off as vapid. The same applies to television: stories that dive into the experiences of teenagers, especially teenage girls, get brushed off as being overemotional, silly, vapid, foolish, you name it.

The Television Academy, like many critics, seems to think that the only "worthy" narratives of teenagers are the ones that cast them in negative lights and cover the darkest corners of their lives.

This dismissal forgets two things: one, that we were all teenagers once, going through all of these things, and two, that the melodramatics of teenagedom aren't really that different from the overwrought melodrama on many adult critical favorites. Isn't it interesting that the "teen" shows that are getting Emmy love - Euphoria and The Politician - are the ones that treat their teenage characters basically as adults, exploring sex and drugs and gritty, dark things. Is that part of the teen experience? Sure, for some teens, it is. But for many teenagers, the stakes are a little lower in daily life - and that's not good enough for critics and voters, apparently.

It's why the omission of shows like Never Have I Ever, for instance, stings. The Television Academy, like many critics, seems to think that the only "worthy" narratives about teenagers are the ones that cast them in negative lights and cover the darkest corners of their lives. They are like anthropologists studying some foreign culture and latching onto the most scandalous elements. Never Have I Ever covers the awkwardness of being a teenager, cultural identity concerns, figuring out sexuality (for multiple orientations), and grief - all themes that should appeal to voters, if history is anything to go by. And yet, it's a snarky comedy centered on a teenage girl and her friends.

Let's get this straight: I'm not saying that every teen show that doesn't get an Emmy nomination is actually a high-quality program that's only being left out due to snobbery around its target audience. I don't think anyone would argue that shows like Riverdale or Outer Banks are Emmy-worthy programming! But when there are shows over the years like Buffy the Vampire Slayer or Gilmore Girls or, more recently, Sex Education or Never Have I Ever that are genuinely excellent TV, it's hard to find other reasons for their exclusion other than genre bias.

More From

  • Zelda Williams Shares an Emotional Note Ahead of the Anniversary of Robin Williams's Death

    On the sixth anniversary of Robin Williams's death, Zelda Williams is remembering her father's legacy by taking a break from social media. On Monday, the 31-year-old actress revealed that she would be stepping offline on Tuesday in honor of her father, who died by suicide on Aug.

  • Apparently, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Were Hiding a Major Secret When They Made Their Public Debut

    I still remember the day like it was yesterday. It was a Monday, Sept. 25, 2017, to be exact. It also happened to be day three of Prince Harry's Invictus Games in Toronto. At the time, I'd only really heard tidbits here and there about his relationship with Meghan Markle: they were introduced through their mutual friend Misha Nonoo, they'd already met each other's parents, and they were even spotted on a date night in London. Harry and Meghan had yet to make their public debut as a couple, but that was all about to change. During the wheelchair tennis event, it finally happened. Harry and Meghan walked out hand in hand, marking their first public appearance as a couple after a year of dating. Given that the Invictus Games hold a special place in Harry's heart and Meghan was currently living in Toronto, it only made sense that they used the event to mark a major milestone in their relationship. Harry and Meghan kept things casual in jeans and were all smiles as they sat in their seats. However, what we didn't know at the time was that they were hiding a major secret: they were engaged ! According to royal reporters Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand's book Finding Freedom: Harry and Meghan and the Making of a Modern Royal Family, Meghan hinted at the engagement by wearing a classic white button-down shirt from Misha's collection called the "Husband Shirt." Pretty clever, eh? Still, it wasn't until two months later that they finally announced the exciting news and stepped out to celebrate during a gorgeous engagement photo call at the Sunken Gardens at Kensington Palace. In an interview with BBC, Harry and Meghan revealed that it was just a regular, "cozy" night for them at their cottage in Kensington Palace when he popped the question. They were roasting, or "trying to roast," a chicken when he got down on one knee. "It was just an amazing surprise," Meghan said. "It was so sweet and natural and very romantic." However, it's still not totally clear when exactly Harry proposed. Fast forward to present day, and now they're married and parents to their 1-year-old son, Archie. Keep reading to see what Meghan and Harry were probably thinking when they made their public debut as a couple. Related: What's Going On With Harry and Meghan? Everything to Know About Their Royal Exit

  • From J Balvin to The Weeknd, Here Are the Artists Performing at the 2020 MTV VMAs

    The first batch of MTV VMAs performers have finally been revealed! On Aug. 4, MTV announced that Doja Cat, J Balvin, and BTS will be taking the stage at this year's ceremony as it makes its return to New York City's Barclays Center on Aug. 30. To make matters even more exciting, Keke Palmer will be hosting and the show will be mixing things up by featuring performances from various locations throughout Brooklyn, Manhattan, Queens, The Bronx, and Staten Island to honor the spirit and resilience of New York. Nominations have also already been announced, and Lady Gaga and Ariana Grande are leading the pack with nine nods each thanks in large part to their "Rain on Me" collaboration. As we wait to find out who will take home a Moon Person this year, see the list of performers ahead, and be sure to check back for updates. Related: Blast From the Past: 56 Unforgettable MTV VMAs Moments

  • 42 Ridiculously Good Beauty Deals to Grab From the Nordstrom Anniversary Sale

    Hold onto your makeup bags, as you're in for a big shopping adventure. The Nordstrom Anniversary Sale has some of the most impressive beauty deals we've seen in a long time. From deep discounts to value sets, there are tons of ways to save a chunk of change. Brands like Charlotte Tilbury, NARS, Drybar, Anastasia Beverly Hills, Supergoop!, MAC, Living Proof, Aveda, and plenty more are serving up irresistible offers. The sale officially starts on Aug. 19 and lasts to the 30th, but Nordstrom card holders can start shopping between Aug. 4 and 13, depending on their cardholder status. Until you're able to shop, you can still preview the deals on the site. Let's add the best makeup, hair, and skin-care markdowns to our wish lists, so we're ready to go. Related: 29 Nordstrom Anniversary Sale Dresses So Cute, You'll Be "Oohing" and "Ahhing"