• Home
  • Mail
  • News
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Search
  • Mobile
  • More
Yahoo
    • Skip to Navigation
    • Skip to Main Content
    • Skip to Related Content
    • Mail
    Lifestyle Home
    Follow Us
    • Style
    • Beauty
    • Wellness
    • Shopping
    • MAKERS
    • Holiday Guide for Guys
    • Pets
    • Video
    • Horoscopes
    • Pop Culture

    Shakira defends taking Super Bowl gig because Latinos have 'been through so much in Trump's America'

    Erin Donnelly
    Yahoo MusicNovember 12, 2019
    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share

    Though long an exclusive showcase for the biggest music superstars, the Super Bowl halftime show performance has been fraught with political tension in recent years thanks to the NFL’s standoff with former player Colin Kaepernick over his taking a knee during the national anthem to protest police brutality against people of color.

    Some artists — including Travis Scott, who joined Maroon 5 at the 2019 show — have faced backlash for performing, and Jay-Z’s recent partnership with the NFL prompted accusations that the rap mogul was taking sides against Kaepernick. But Shakira — who will headline the 2020 halftime show on Feb. 2 in Miami alongside Jennifer Lopez — says taking part is an opportunity to celebrate her culture.

    In an interview with The Guardian, the Colombian singer also referenced the impact of Donald Trump’s policies on the Latinx community — and her urge to reclaim some power for her people — when asked if the NFL’s treatment of Kaepernick had given her pause.

    “Well, you know, I think it’s the right thing to do for the Latino community because we’ve also been through so much in Trump’s America, with walls being built and …” she told the British newspaper. “It’s an opportunity to celebrate our culture, you know?”

    It’s not the first time the “Hips Don’t Lie” singer has sounded off on Trump. In 2017, the half-Lebanese star wrote an essay for Time reacting to Trump’s ban on travelers from Muslim-majority countries, which she called “an attack on all humans and in particular, the ones most in need of protection.”

    “Shakira: America Must Protect All Our People” @TIMEhttps://t.co/n0Z24ONQ25 #resist pic.twitter.com/0k9GuEnxH6

    — Shakira (@shakira) February 9, 2017

    She continued, "Latinos are our people ... They come seeking an opportunity to build a better life for themselves and for their children, which is what the U.S. has always prided itself on representing: opportunities."

    Her Super Bowl gig was announced in September.

    “I’m so honored to be taking on one of the world’s biggest stages in the company of a fellow female artist to represent Latinos and Latinas from the U.S. and all over the world — and to top it off, on my birthday!” Shakira said at the time. “This is a true American dream and we are going to bring the show of a lifetime!”

    Two 👑 👑 First time together on stage…on the world’s biggest stage. Welcome @JLo and @shakira to #PepsiHalftime #SBLIV @RocNation @NFL pic.twitter.com/ks1p9FbMLB

    — Pepsi (@pepsi) September 26, 2019

    The rapper Pitbull, who has collaborated with both Shakira and Lopez and is of Cuban descent, is also rumored to take the Super Bowl LIV stage in his hometown of Miami.


    Read more from Yahoo Entertainment:

    • Dee Snider calls out NFL for ignoring ‘heavy music’ for Super Bowl halftime show: ‘No respect’

    • Morgan and Bode Miller welcome twin boys during ‘unassisted home delivery’

    • Khloe Kardashian says she's 'proud' of the co-parenting she does with ex-boyfriend Tristan Thompson

    Want daily pop culture news delivered to your inbox? Sign up here for Yahoo Entertainment & Lifestyle’s newsletter.

    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share

    What to Read Next

    • Two Women Landed in the ER After Using a Vacuum to End Their Periods, According to a Nurse's Scary Viral Tweet

      Meredith Videos
    • Nike unveils all-day shoes for nurses, and we want a pair—stat

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • "Milky Nails" Are the Manicure Trend You're Going to See All Throughout 2020

      Allure
    • Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds' Wedding Photos Are Now Banned from Pinterest

      Harper's Bazaar
    • Tarek El Moussa and Heather Rae Young Snap 'Family' Holiday Pic with Kids

      House Beautiful
    • Kendall Jenner's Nude Minidress Looks Like It's Dripping in Tinsel

      Harper's Bazaar
    • This Extended-stay Hotel Will Let You Foster a Dog During Your Stay — and Adopt It in the Lobby On Your Way Out

      Travel+Leisure
    • 17 Photos That Show the Surprising Physical Side of Depression

      The Mighty
    • Can You Wear Red to a Wedding? This Is the Definitive Answer

      Who What Wear
    • Amazon delivery man speaks out after video of his celebratory dance goes viral: 'I was extremely suprised'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Miss Universe is Breaking Barriers With Its First Openly Gay Contestant

      Glamour
    • Ryan Reynolds recruits 'Peloton wife' for hilarious new Aviation Gin ad

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Jennifer Lopez jokes about turning 50 and strips down to her iconic green Versace dress on 'Saturday Night Live'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Pink Gave Herself a Buzz Cut and — No Surprise — Looks Like a Total Badass

      Allure
    • This SKIMS Collection Is Everything You Need and More This Winter

      Who What Wear
    • Abandoned 5-Year-Old Carries Toddler in Extreme Cold After Adult Allegedly Left Them in Home

      People

    President Trump 'abused his power to improperly put his thumb on the scale for the election': Rep. Zoe Lofgren

    bigO: I am somewhat of a political nerd and former law enforcement, so both definitely affect my opinions. 1) The proceedings to date have been dictated by the majority (Democrats) without trying to garner any input from the minority (Republicans). In the past, the majority has always reached out to the minority, regardless if the minority agreed or not (ex: Pres Clinton's impeachment) for both the appearance of bipartisanship in the House and publicly. The proceedings to date have not even come close to mirroring precedent. 2) Speaking from a legal point of view, I do not know any prosecutor who would accept a case such as this to send to the Grand Jury. Nothing in the report from Rep Schiff has anything which would be codified in the federal legal system, nor would be recognized by common law. Again, this breaks with precedent. 3) Along with #2, all of the "damaging" testimony to date has been hearsay and supposition (opinion). Yes, there is the actual call, but no specific demands tying things together. Couple with the facts the Ukrainians did not know the aid was being withheld, nor did their President feel pressured, would seem to undercut the argument. 4) I was interested in the constitutional witnesses (again - political nerd / law enforcement), but I was struck the first witness was called by Republicans while the remaining three were called by Democrats. Traditionally, it would be 2-2 in the spirit of bipartisanship. However, I was struck by the one witness who seemed to really push back on impeachment. 5) At least to me the whole process seems to be really rushed. If the Democrats are going to truly investigate Pres Trump, then put the time and effort in to do it correctly. Looking at the history of when the House issues subpoenas (ex: Pres Clinton / AG Holder / Pres Nixon), the House traditionally takes its time to work through various issues and looks to resolve them without legal action. We have even seen that be the case fairly recently (AG Barr releasing additional information regarding the Mueller report). But, the rush to issue subpoenas, and the apparent unwillingness for the courts to work through various key witnesses (ex: Bolton / Mulvaney) seems more of a drive to have Articles of Impeachment voted upon versus getting the whole story. 6) I am also fairly troubled with the report from Rep Schiff as not only does it throw a bunch of stuff against the wall which has not been fully investigated, but it released a great deal of phone numbers / conversations to the public. This should be immediately addressed in the strongest of terms as any prosecutor who did this would not only be subjected to firing, but potential jail time as well. 7) Initially I expected the House to vote on 3-4 Articles of Impeachment. But, as Rep Nadler accepted the report from Rep Schiff on the whole, and Rep Pelosi ordered Rep Nadler to move forward with Articles, I think the number could grow exponentially. This might be an attempt to see what sticks or at least give some Reps cover so they could vote against some in districts where Pres Trump did very well. 8a) The whole scenario changes once it hits the Senate. I have seen more than a few promote the idea the Senate will call various people to the trial (Pompeo / Bolton / Mulvaney), but I doubt that will happen. Although the Chief Justice presides, it is really the majority in the Senate which dictate what will or will not take place. It has been reported Sen Schumer has rebuffed negotiations with Sen McConnel regarding the rules of a proposed trial. If that continues, then Sen McConnel, with the Republican majority, could have a simple vote on the rules regardless of what the minority want (i.e. what the House did). 8b) Unless something changes, my presumption is the trial will last 4-8 weeks with possibly 1-Republican voting for removal while potentially 2-Democrats will vote against. Of course, all of the above could change if first-hand information is revealed which directly contradicts what Pres Trump has said to date. But, as independents have been moving away from impeachment, and the process has been very one-sided, if nothing changes I expect Pres Trump to stay in office.

    Join the Conversation
    1 / 5

    1.8k

    • Where You Should Travel Solo, Based on Your Zodiac Sign

      Travel+Leisure
    • Chrissy Teigen Claps Back at a Troll Who Tells Her to “Cover Up” Around Her Daughter

      Prevention
    • NFL Network's Jane Slater Caught Her Boyfriend Cheating Due to His Fitbit

      Men's Health
    • Her Own Private Island: Why Princess Margaret Loved Mustique More Than Any Palace

      Town & Country
    • Newlyweds killed in tragic helicopter crash after their wedding

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Ryan Reynolds Trolled That Conversational Peloton Ad and the Internet Has Thoughts

      Glamour
    • Princess Charlotte Casually Asked for a Pony for Christmas This Year

      Cosmopolitan
    • Goop has been reported to U.K. officials for allegedly breaching advertising law

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Lady Gaga Just Went Pantsless in a T-Shirt, Fishnets & Barely Anything Else

      Marie Claire
    • The True Story of Queen Elizabeth's Final Visit with the Duke of Windsor

      Town & Country
    • Liam Hemsworth speaks out on Miley split

      Yahoo Lifestyle Videos
    • I Wear Leggings 4 Times a Week—These Are the Shoes I Recommend

      Who What Wear
    • Cyclist Posts Snarky Warning Signs Aimed at Runners on Popular Mixed-Use Trail

      Men's Health
    • Halle Berry rocks a wet T-shirt — and no bra — for her 53rd birthday

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Fans defend Meghan Markle from 'haters' over baby Archie's private christening plans

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Ariana Grande Just Reached Out to Her TikTok Doppelgänger

      Harper's Bazaar