• Home
  • Mail
  • News
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Search
  • Mobile
  • More
Yahoo
    • Skip to Navigation
    • Skip to Main Content
    • Skip to Related Content
    • Mail
    Lifestyle Home
    Follow Us
    • Style
    • Beauty
    • Wellness
    • Shopping
    • MAKERS
    • Holiday Guide for Guys
    • Pets
    • Video
    • Horoscopes
    • Pop Culture

    Schiff on why Democrats didn’t call the Ukraine whistleblower to testify

    Kadia Tubman
    Reporter
    Yahoo NewsNovember 24, 2019
    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share

    Despite two weeks of extraordinary impeachment hearings, which amassed a dozen witnesses and over 30 hours of testimony, there was one person the public and Democratic-led House of Representatives did not get to hear from: the still-anonymous whistleblower who triggered the impeachment inquiry into President Trump. 

    House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff, D-Calif., on Sunday told NBC’s “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd the committee wanted to call for the whistleblower’s testimony but declined to do so for a pair of reasons. 

    “You did pledge that the intelligence committee would hear from the whistleblower in some form or another,” Todd said. “Are you going to fulfill that pledge?”

    “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened,” Schiff said. “One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had firsthand information; and second, the president and his allies effectively put that whistleblower’s life in danger.”

    He continued: “The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy and we ought to use the penalty we used to use for traitors and spies, and that’s the death penalty."

    “So here’s the thing, Chuck, we don’t need the whistleblower secondhand evidence anymore,” Schiff added. “It would only serve to endanger this person and to gratify the president’s desire for retribution and that is not a good enough reason to bring in the whistleblower.”

    Rep. Adam Schiff during the House Intelligence Committee's open hearings on the impeachment of President Trump. (Photo: Michael Brochstein/Echoes Wire/Barcroft Media via Getty Images)
    Rep. Adam Schiff during the House Intelligence Committee's open hearings on the impeachment of President Trump. (Photo: Michael Brochstein/Echoes Wire/Barcroft Media via Getty Images)

    Trump, at the conclusion of the televised impeachment hearings, continued his calls for the whistleblower’s identity to be revealed as he lashed out at the inquiry in an interview with “Fox & Friends” last Friday. 

    “The bottom line is all of those witnesses, they're all shifty Schiff, don't forget. There was no due process. You can't have lawyers. We couldn't have any witnesses. We want to call the whistleblower,” Trump said, before adding, “I want a trial” in the Senate if the House votes to impeach him. 

    Meanwhile, the FBI recently sought to question the whistleblower, as Yahoo News first reported last week. No interview has been scheduled. 

    The inquiry followed the whistleblower’s complaint regarding President Trump’s July 25 call with Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky. It is centered on the president’s efforts, conveyed through his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, to Ukraine to announce investigations of potential opponent Joe Biden and his son Hunter. Part of the pressure on Ukraine involved the temporary withholding of military aid. 

    While the public hearings have ended, and Schiff on CNN's "State of the Union said, “The evidence that's been produced overwhelmingly shows serious misconduct by the president,” the Democratic lawmaker doesn’t “foreclose the possibility of more depositions, more hearings.”

    “We are in the process of getting more documents all the time. So that investigative work is being done," he told host Jake Tapper. "What we're not going to do is wait months and months while the administration plays a game of rope-a-dope in an effort to try to stall. We're not willing to go down that road. And what's more, the evidence is already overwhelming.”

    Schiff spoke about another potential witness, John Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser, who reemerged on Twitter last week amid the hearings and had refused to testify before Congress, but, as the Democratic leader acknowledged, would be more likely to testify before a Republican-majority Senate. 

    “We have certainly been in touch with his lawyer. And what we have been informed by his lawyer — because we invited him to come in, and he did not choose to come in and testify, notwithstanding the fact that his deputy Fiona Hill and his other deputy, Colonel Vindman, and Tim Morrison and others in the National Security Council have shown the courage to come in — is, if we subpoena him, they will sue us in court,” Schiff told Tapper. 

    “Now, he will have to explain one day if he maintains that position, why he wanted to wait to put it in a book, instead of telling the American people what he knew when it really mattered to the country,” he added.

    Schiff, nodding to the possibility of upcoming investigations, told Todd, “There are still other witnesses, other documents we would like to obtain" before articles of impeachment would be moved from the House, likely before the year’s end.

    When asked by Todd whether he would testify if called by the Senate in an impeachment trial in the event that the House impeaches Trump, Schiff said, “If the Senate wants to call me as a witness then they pretty much made the decision not to take this process seriously.”

    “I’m not a fact witness,” he added.

    _____

    Download the Yahoo News app to customize your experience.

    Read more from Yahoo News:

    • Rebuilding Paradise: A year after the Camp Fire, one couple finds healing in starting over

    • Key Democrat: House needs to 'keep this simple' in crafting impeachment articles

    • As Supreme Court weighs DACA, Trump pushes fiction about 'hardened criminals'

    • ‘The 360’: What is quid pro quo and does it matter?

    • PHOTOS: Remembering JFK on the assassination annive

    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share

    What to Read Next

    • Amazon delivery man speaks out after video of his celebratory dance goes viral: 'I was extremely suprised'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • "Milky Nails" Are the Manicure Trend You're Going to See All Throughout 2020

      Allure
    • Two Women Landed in the ER After Using a Vacuum to End Their Periods, According to a Nurse's Scary Viral Tweet

      Meredith Videos
    • Ryan Reynolds recruits 'Peloton wife' for hilarious new Aviation Gin ad

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Abandoned 5-Year-Old Carries Toddler in Extreme Cold After Adult Allegedly Left Them in Home

      People
    • Jennifer Lopez jokes about turning 50 and strips down to her iconic green Versace dress on 'Saturday Night Live'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Lady Gaga Just Went Pantsless in a T-Shirt, Fishnets & Barely Anything Else

      Marie Claire
    • Nike unveils all-day shoes for nurses, and we want a pair—stat

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • NFL Network's Jane Slater Caught Her Boyfriend Cheating Due to His Fitbit

      Men's Health
    • Kendall Jenner's Nude Minidress Looks Like It's Dripping in Tinsel

      Harper's Bazaar
    • Emma Watson Wears Velvet Thigh-High Boots to the ‘Little Women’ Premiere

      Footwear News
    • Melania Trump Pops in Turquoise With Leopard-Print Louboutins at a Children’s Hospital

      Footwear News
    • This local hardware store’s $130 commercial is being dubbed ‘the best Christmas ad of the year'

      In The Know
    • NCIS LA's Daniela Ruah Shared Some Candid Thoughts on Brother-in-Law Eric Christian Olsen

      Country Living
    • Kim and Khloé Confront Kourtney About Not Sharing Enough of Her Personal Life on 'KUWTK' and It's So Uncomfortable

      Cosmopolitan
    • Millie Bobby Brown criticized for makeup and hair on Instagram: ‘You’re 15. Stop’

      Yahoo Lifestyle

    Chuck Todd Laces Into Ted Cruz for Saying Ukraine Meddled in 2016 Election

    Mark: "There is considerable evidence Ted Cruz Farther worked with JFK killer Oswald"....Donald Trump 2016.......Why is Cruz family not being investigated.....

    Join the Conversation
    1 / 5

    476

    • NFL correspondent Jane Slater caught her ex cheating via Fitbit: ‘Wish the story wasn’t real’

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Your Blood Pressure Reading May Be Inaccurate, According to Experts

      Woman's Day
    • Hailey Baldwin Looks So Cozy in This Oversized Beige Outfit With Sneakers

      Footwear News
    • Meghan McCain Tweeted a Powerful Message to a 'View' Fan Undergoing Chemo

      Good Housekeeping
    • Melanie Griffith poses in black bikini at age 61: '60 is the new 40'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Meghan Markle Wore Naked Shoes to Her First Hollywood Event in 2006

      Who What Wear
    • Her Own Private Island: Why Princess Margaret Loved Mustique More Than Any Palace

      Town & Country
    • Woman's e-cigarette habit leads to her 'cobalt lung' diagnosis – an incurable disease found only in metal workers

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Where You Should Travel Solo, Based on Your Zodiac Sign

      Travel+Leisure
    • Beth Chapman, wife of 'Dog' memorialized in live-streamed ceremony: 'Bounty hunter in heels'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • How to Make Almond Butter (Because It’s Like $15 a Jar)

      PureWow
    • Gun activist Kaitlin Bennett has a post-engagement message to haters: 'The Left is so sick'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Kate Middleton Revealed That Prince Louis Has Hit a Big Milestone

      Elle
    • Chrissy Teigen’s New Shag Is the Haircut Everyone Is Asking for this Winter

      Meredith Videos
    • 17 Photos That Show the Surprising Physical Side of Depression

      The Mighty
    • Waffle House customers help stranded employee by washing dishes, taking orders: ‘It was incredible to witness’

      Yahoo Lifestyle