Republicans Like Jim Jordan Are Using COVID To Try To Ban Protests

Erin Corbett
Rep. Jim Jordan, R-OH, speaks during the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law hearing on “Online Platforms and Market Power” in the Rayburn House office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on July 29, 2020. (Photo by Graeme JENNINGS / POOL / AFP) (Photo by GRAEME JENNINGS/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Rep. Jim Jordan, R-OH, speaks during the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law hearing on “Online Platforms and Market Power” in the Rayburn House office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on July 29, 2020. (Photo by Graeme JENNINGS / POOL / AFP) (Photo by GRAEME JENNINGS/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

In a heated exchange during a U.S. House subcommittee hearing about the coronavirus pandemic on Friday, Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan repeatedly goaded Dr. Anthony Fauci into taking a stance against the ongoing protests to end police violence.

“Should government limit the protesting?” asked Jordan, a Republican. Dr. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), correctly replied that it is not his position to determine how government can use force. “I don’t understand why you’re asking me as a public health official who should get arrested or not,” Dr. Fauci said, according to CBS News.

Dr. Fauci added that people should generally continue to avoid crowds because it can lead to transmission of the virus, particularly in cases where people are not taking the necessary precautions like wearing masks. “I don’t judge one crowd versus another crowd. When you’re in a crowd, particularly if you’re not wearing a mask, that induces the spread,” Dr. Fauci said.

Jordan pointed to canceled church services nationwide and state governments shutting down the economy — with the exception of essential businesses — to then ask Dr. Fauci why the regulations are seemingly inconsistent when it comes to protests. Dr. Fauci replied that there is “no inconsistency.” For the record, church services have emerged as a major source of coronavirus spread, while protests have not.

Jordan’s inappropriate line of questioning is just one example of how Republican lawmakers are launching aggressive attacks on the right to protest, using the disproven talking point that racial justice protests are contributing to the spread of coronavirus.

Despite efforts to push a narrative that protests are to blame for the spread of COVID, a study published in the National Bureau of Economic Research last month found “no evidence that net COVID-19 case growth differentially rose following the onset of Black Lives Matter protests.” Experts say this is likely because protestors are outside and most of them wear masks. Demonstrators at actions nationwide have commented on the ways people are keeping each other safe in the streets by handing out masks and hand sanitizer. Likewise, experts say people are more likely to spread the virus at parties and in workplaces than at protests.

But Republicans — who have repeatedly downplayed the deadly virus when it’s convenient for them — are now using it to curtail the rights of Black Lives Matter protestors, who have been harassed, assaulted, and criminalized since the uprisings first started across the country in late May. 

Jordan himself has been inconsistent on the matter of protests, seemingly preferring some over others. The congressman seemed to express support for those largely mask-less protestors who wanted to reopen the economy in April, calling sensible restrictions like those of Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer an “attack on freedom.”

Both parties have attacked Black Lives Matter protestors over the last few months, making distinctions between “good” and “bad” protestors, and pushing dangerous narratives about “outside agitators” and “anarchists.” (It is neither illegal to be an agitator, nor an anarchist.)

These talking points have had harmful material consequences. In New York state, for example, anti-protest legislation was introduced last month that would heighten the legal penalties for rioting, and we’ve seen the ways that limiting the legal protections of demonstrators can lead to further violence against them. From Portland to New York City, law enforcement have both kidnapped and detained protestors without record. 

That a Republican congressman would demand for a top public health official to take a stance on the legality of protesting is alarming, to say the least. It’s equally alarming that Jordan seems hellbent on injecting a culture war — pointedly bringing up churches and denouncing racial justice protests — into a public health discussion. Based on the level of repression we’ve seen at protests in the last few months, it’s imperative to push back against a line of thinking that will only put more people in danger.

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

Melania Trump To America: "Let Them Eat Cake"

Protests Haven't Led To A Spike In COVID-19 Cases

"The Police Are More Dangerous Than COVID-19"

More From

  • OPI Just Dropped Its Fall Nail Collection — & Every Shade Is Bellissima

    Following the success of OPI's 2019 fall collection — inspired by the moss greens of an idyllic Scottish countryside — the just-released 2020 assortment brings us to a new global locale: Milan, Italy. Beyond the rich shades inspired by recognizable Italian tones, the color story woven through this destination assortment feels especially meaningful in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, which disproportionally impacted Milan's Lombardy region. "Last year, before the pandemic hit, we traveled to Milan to source inspiration for this collection," explains OPI Co-Founder Suzi Weiss-Fischmann. "We ate fresh pasta, spent hours walking the city streets, and drank Campari while admiring the incredible street style. Of course, at the time, we had no idea the hardships Milan would soon face. But through this collection, we pay homage to the magical city that showed its loving spirit, even at the height of the coronavirus outbreak." From a pearlescent blue inspired by balcony choirs to a burgundy sourced from Italian wine, scroll ahead for 12 new shades that will transport you to a balmy fall evening in Milan, and bring some joy to your fingertips in the process. At Refinery29, we’re here to help you navigate this overwhelming world of stuff. All of our market picks are independently selected and curated by the editorial team. If you buy something we link to on our site, Refinery29 may earn commission.Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?The Mismatched Manicure Trend Just Got An UpgradeMeghan Markle's Bridal Mani-Pedi Broke TraditionCharli & Dixie D'Amelio Launch Nail Polish Collab

  • An Astrologer Analyzes Joe Biden & Kamala Harris’s Chance Of Winning The Election

    If you’re anything like me, you look to the stars to find meaning in all events that occur in the world. The 2020 Presidential Election is no different. When Kamala Harris was picked as Joe Biden’s running mate, I was excited — and I took a look at her chart (and his) to peep the deets of what’s to come, politically. Kamala Harris was born on October 20, 1964 at 9:28 p.m. in Oakland, CA. She came into the world during the Full Moon in Aries, which means she has a Libra Sun and an Aries Moon. Her Sun-Moon opposition means that she is a purveyor of truth, justice, peace — and she won’t stop on this pursuit until she achieves her goals. Her Gemini ascendent means that she’s very open to growth and bringing people together. Her opinions are based on facts and truths. As a leader, she’s fair-minded, passionate, and someone who wants to change the world through universal healing. Joe Biden was born on November 20, 1942 at 8:30 a.m. in Scranton, PA. He was born during a Waxing Full Moon, which means the Moon was just about to be at its peak luminescence. Like Harris, Biden is a person who cares about the people of the world. He’s not a person who puts politics first; he genuinely wants to help others (which is probably why he entered politics in the first place). As I took a gander at their charts separately, I marveled at their synastry  (aka their relationship astrology, a comparison of their birth charts). Their ascendants are in opposite signs to each other. This means that they were born to be in each other’s lives. They compensate for each other’s qualities and flaws — especially when it comes to their political and public views. Being that they are both born on Full Moons and Waning Full Moons, they have larger-than-life personalities which may add flavor to their candidacy together. Harris’s North Node of Destiny in Sagittarius falls on his ascendant in Sagittarius, which means that their pairing is fated in the stars. Regardless of your political leanings, astrologically speaking, Harris and Biden are literally the ideal pair to run together in the upcoming election.I also worked up a birth chart for the public announcement that was made about their decision to run together in the election, their “event chart.” This is also known as electional astrology, and was famously used by Ronald Reagan in the 1980s to use them to map out the safest times for public announcements after his assassination attempt.Their chart is very fortunate. The announcement came at 4:15 p.m. EST on August 11, 2020, during the Last Quarter Moon, which is the ideal time to make a transformative announcement. The Sun was in passionate Leo, the Moon was in charming Taurus, and the ascendant was in expansive Sagittarius. > Regardless of your political leanings, astrologically speaking, Harris and Biden are literally the ideal pair to run together in the upcoming election.In an event chart, astrologers only really look at the placements and signs of the Moon, the ascendant, and the Sun. In Biden and Harris’s chart, the Sun is strong in Leo and the Moon is at its best in Taurus, in the fifth house of self-expression. The ruler of the ascendant is Jupiter, which is located in the first house. This will yield a positive outcome. At the time Harris announced her run for VP, her Sun was in the Midheaven of the event chart, which means she’s making a very public statement that will alter her life forever. Transiting Saturn was squaring her natal Sun and Moon. Known as the karmic taskmaster of the zodiac, Saturn — who is retrograde in Capricorn — was telling her to boss up and accept her new role, even if it’s awkward and uncomfortable to be sprung into the public like that. The transiting Nodes of Destiny were gracefully galvanizing her natal Sun and Moon, and the North Node of Destiny was on her ascendent. This tells us that she’s meant to shine now. Does she have a chance at winning the election? This question yields an interesting answer. Transiting Neptune is backpedaling through her natal Midheaven in Pisces until November 28. There will be uncertainty about what endeavors she wishes to support. Still, this Neptune placement allows one to enchant others with their words; people will be drawn to Harris’s charisma. She is also having a nodal opposition this year, meaning the Nodes of Destiny oppose each other. This transit brings luck, which could be an indicator that her campaign will be successful. Another good sign: On Election Day, the Moon will be in Gemini, on Harris’s ascendant, and on the transiting North Node of Destiny. The Moon, however, will be on her natal South Node, which can indicate an emotional loss. Still, it’s my professional opinion that this team has a high chance of winning the election. Both of their charts support a win — particularly hers, which indicates that Biden made a smart pick if he hopes to crush the election. The only caveat is that she needs to be clear on their incentives. If she’s decisive, then her chances are high. This isn’t a grand slam win, but their odds are looking up. Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Susan Miller Tried To Warn Us About Wedding SeasonUranus Retrograde Will Finally Bring Us LiberationKamala Harris' Record As A Prosecutor, Explained

  • Apparently Mike Pence “Can’t Wait” To Debate Kamala Harris

    The name on everybody’s lips is Kamala — and that includes Vice President Mike Pence, who said that he “can’t wait” for their first debate. While Pence didn’t quite admit that he was ready to be crushed by Sen. Kamala Harris, a notably proficient debater, many are already speculating what a Harris-Pence debate will really look like. Based on his comments, though, Pence feels he is prepared.During an appearance on Hannity Wednesday night, the vice president said he’s looking forward to debating Harris in their first debate scheduled for October in Utah. “I just have to tell you, you know, I like the matchup,” Pence said. “It’s on, Sean. I can’t wait to get back out there.” Pence then went on to suggest the Democratic ticket had been taken over by the so-called “radical left” — an exciting new Trump administration talking point that has gained some traction among his supporters in the wake of nationwide protests against police brutality. “I think she is a skilled debater,” Pence told the Fox host. “But I can’t wait to get to Salt Lake City and be on the stage with her to compare Joe Biden’s nearly 50 years of public life, the agenda of the radical left, the agenda that she’s embraced throughout her political career.”Many Republicans have made similar claims about Harris, painting her as a “radical left” and even “socialist” candidate. In a Fox appearance of her own this week, Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney said Biden chose Harris as his running mate to “placate the very far socialist left of [Biden’s] party.” Jason Miller, an advisor to President Trump echoed the same, tweeting that Biden’s VP pick proves the “radical left-wing mob has taken complete control of” his campaign. It seems Pence plans to continue this rhetoric and likely bring it onto the debate stage.Despite the fear-mongering from conservatives over “socialism” and “anarchy” within the Democratic establishment, Harris isn’t exactly considered radical by the left. Harris may have a progressive voting record in Congress, and the California senator has been vocal in her support for abortion access and DACA, but many people have been critical of her prosecutorial record, including her support for an anti-truancy program that threatened to jail parents if their kids missed school, and her prior opposition to gender-affirming surgeries for incarcerated trans people. Harris has since taken responsibility for the latter, and community organizers vow to continue holding her accountable if Biden and Harris win come November. And it looks like they might have a chance. The Democratic vice presidential nominee has a higher favorability rating than Trump, Pence and even Biden, according to a survey conducted by ABC News/Ipsos. But when it comes to the debate stage, Harris has proven time and again that she’s a force to be reckoned with. The California Democrat pressed Biden on his controversial record on civil rights, and she fervently questioned Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh over the sexual assault allegations brought against him in 2018. Based on her impressive debating alone, Pence should probably be more worried than excited for this match-up. Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Why Republicans Are Mispronouncing Kamala's NameWTF Did Jeanine Pirro Just Say About Joe Biden?Trump: Joe Biden Will "Hurt God" If Elected

  • Meet The New Social Media Stars Making A Hobby Of Dismantling Influencer Culture

    Consider how much the events of this year have reprioritized your world: Are you thinking about injustices or societal problems you hadn’t considered before? Do you still spend money in the same way? Have you altered big career goals or personal life plans? For many of us, this means that the social media celebrities and influencers we used to love (or maybe loved to hate) have dropped to the bottom of what feels necessary these days. Frankly, some have become just plain difficult to watch. Whether they’re hopping on the latest hashtag trend that seems like just another excuse to post a selfie, or engaging in more actively harmful activities — like attending crowded gatherings, posting performative “social justice” messages, accepting PPP loans they don’t need, or knocking off struggling small designers — it can be hard to justify tuning in, if it means lining their pockets. The simplest-seeming choice is to smash the unfollow button and move on. But for some observers, that’s not enough. There’s a small but growing number of social media users dedicated to calling out shady influencer behavior, whether it’s photoshopping images and pretending they’re hadn’t, or potentially endangering the lives of others during a pandemic. Among most popular of these social media vigilantes is Instagram account InfluencersTruth, which currently has over 68k followers, and is structured similarly to Diet Prada, the famed fashion world caller-outer. The creator, C., who spoke to Refinery29 on the condition of anonymity, says that InfluencersTruth’s goals are simple: “I can assure you that this wasn’t part of some grand plan. Right now, InfluencersTruth is a solo act with no plans to monetize itself in any way,” she explains. For C., her motivation was purely emotional. After seeing how some high-profile influencers — ones with millions of followers, high-profile sponsorship deals, and successful businesses in their name — dealt with COVID-19, she felt compelled to speak out. “I started InfluencersTruth the first week of April during the height of the pandemic in New York City. My friend was at that time in the hospital due to COVID. He later passed away. What I kept seeing on Instagram from influencers was disgusting. The lack of self-awareness was and continues to be appalling,” C. says. While much of what InfluencersTruth posts are observations about influencers’ content that anyone could theoretically come across, followers also occasionally send along secrets — some of which, C. says, are too mean to post. “I try not to be too snarky,” she explains. “But I think that everyone is tired of these influencers presenting a version of life that just isn’t reality.”Indeed, what may have once felt like fun voyeurism — a window into the world of an ultra-connected one percenter, where designer bags come free in the mail with handwritten cards and everybody has a house in the Hamptons — now feels incredibly tone deaf, especially when the content creator in question tries to have it both ways, posting faux-woke social justice content alongside unboxing videos and sponcon. Our fatigue for the community is growing, and people are noticing. Earlier this year, Marie Claire asked “Is This The End of The Influencer?,” Vanity Fair questioned “Is This The End of Influencing As We Know It?,” Wired to inquire “Could The Coronavirus Kill Influencer Culture?,” and Adweek shot back, “No, Coronavirus Isn’t the End of Influencer Marketing. But It Has Put It Under a Microscope.”It may be premature to tout this backlash as the definitive “end” of influencer culture. Certainly, it’s slowing down, especially as marketing budgets have been slashed for all but the biggest content creators. But thanks to our diminished IRL social lives, we’re spending more time on social apps than ever before. According to data from eMarketer, time spent on social media is expected to rise by 8.8% this year, which means there’s still a real hunger for content. If it’s not the end of influencer culture, then it’s perhaps the end of eye roll-inducing, aspirational-at-all-costs influencer culture. It makes sense to have high expectations of those who claim to lead the lives, inhabit the perspectives, and communicate the ideas that are valuable enough to influence others.These call-out accounts are hardly the first internet-personality watchdogs. Before there was InfluencersTruth or Diet Prada, there was Get Off My Internets (GOMI, for short), an abundantly snarky message board on which anonymous users posted about bloggers, vloggers, and whomever else  annoyed them on the internet that day. Reddit also has a similar community called BlogSnark (there’s also, incredibly, now another subreddit called “blogsnarkmetasnark: a place to snark on the snarkers,” because the snarkers will inevitably become the snarkees, I guess?). But while GOMI and Reddit allow unverified gossip and pure speculation, accounts like InfluencersTruth tend to do some due diligence before publishing. “I think these ‘influencers’ forget that Google is a really powerful tool and you can find anything and everything on there,” C. says. Sophie Ross, a copywriter and freelance journalist and former Refinery29 employee, has brought the business of calling out bad influencer behavior to Twitter, where she has about 11k followers. “A lot of people are so fed up with the facade, especially right now,” she says. “We’re experiencing a cultural shift. People are really seeing through the bullshit. The influencers that are flaunting their Chanel bags when there’s record unemployment rates… there’s just a lot of privilege-flaunting and bad behavior happening.”Neither Ross nor InfluencersTruth have dealt with much backlash, perhaps because what they post tends to be rooted in truth and legitimate issues with influencer culture as opposed to pure snark for snark’s sake. C. says she’s received some “poorly veiled threats” from unhappy influencers, and Ross has, too: “I don’t care,” she says. “Maybe people are thinking I could be burning bridges. But I’m okay without these people. The people who I call out on Twitter aren’t people I would want to associate with ever, anyway.”Though InfluencersTruth has a fraction of the followers that many of the influencers she posts about do, the conversation C. starts around our expectations from the people our likes, clicks, and views support are more relevant than given the events of this year. The demand  for authenticity, accountability, transparency, and just plain reality is what consumers are asking for in other sectors, too; we’re outraged for the same reasons when we find out the cute leggings or direct-to-consumer suitcase sold to us as emblems of progressive values are actually the output of abusive and unhappy work environments. And, like entrepreneurs, business leaders, and pretty much anyone else trying to brand themselves, social content creators who want to remain relevant in a post-2020 world are likely going to have to find a way to adapt.“I don’t think you should wait for something to blow over or wait for people to forget about it,” Ross advises influencers who may have come up against criticism in recent months. “I think you need to handle it head-on, because all of your followers are wondering what’s happening. You owe transparency to your followers. Just be real for a second.”But for those who have spent the better part of a decade airbrushing every aspect of their lives, do they even remember what real looks like? And is it possible for an influencer to apologize or rebrand in a way that doesn’t feel like a self-serving ploy to keep cancellers at bay? There are plenty of jokes about influencers donning messy buns and thick-rimmed glasses to make hollow apology videos, but for those who have had to do this, it can be crushing to realize that the persona you’ve spent years cultivating doesn’t resonate anymore, and maybe even hurts people. But the fact is, having an audience is a huge privilege that nobody is owed. And there are so many people on social media these days — like Ziwe, Rachel Cargle, or Kelli Brown — who are doing the important work of starting dialogues about race and privilege, celebrating diversity, or even just making people laugh, who many might rather see reap some of the benefits other creators with “safer” or more brand-friendly content have long enjoyed.Even among more traditional influencer-types who want to stick with product recommendations and lifestyle shots, observers seem to think it’s still possible to cultivate an authentic relationship with an audience. “I really like Grace Atwood,” says C. “In my opinion, she’s so genuine and really puts in the work unlike a lot of other influencers who just take pictures of themselves.” That being said, C. thinks it’s impossible for influencer culture writ large to be reformed: “What I think should change is their relevance within our culture. If we all stop following, stop swiping up, and stop idolizing, I believe that our society will be healthier and happier.”Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?