NYPD Officers Forced A Protestor Into An Unmarked Van — Just Like In Portland

Britni de la Cretaz

On Tuesday night in Manhattan, police forced a protestor into an unmarked van in the middle of the street, pepper spraying those nearby. The tactics have drawn comparisons to Portland, OR, where federal agents have been terrorizing protestors for weeks, including abducting them off the streets in unmarked vehicles. The incident was captured on video by the independent journalist Michelle Lhooq and quickly went viral.

The incident in the video drew criticism from lawmakers as outrage spread on social media. “This video — of a protester in New York City being thrown in an unmarked van — is terrifying and should be unacceptable to everyone who respects the constitutional rights this country was founded on,” Rep. Jerry Nadler tweeted. “There must be an immediate explanation for this anonymous use of force.” The American Civil Liberties Union called the actions of police seen on the video “dangerous, abusive, and indefensible.”

The outcry forced NYPD to confirm the incident. The video shows a protest marching towards the intersection of Second Ave and 25th Street, where a silver Kia van is stopped, doors open. Several men in navy shirts are wrestling with someone, later identified as an 18-year-old trans woman, and trying to drag her into the van. Observers become upset and begin screaming and running towards the van, but are forced back. A group of bicycle police push through the crowd gathered around the van to form a perimeter and the van drives off with the protestor inside.

“Suddenly there was an unmarked grey van that moved out in front of us that had been waiting for us,” Derrick, a 32-year-old protestor, told Gothamist. “Four guys jumped out and a line of police bicycles came out from down the block — we hadn’t seen them. They pushed us back. They grabbed [her] like she was a rag doll…They had her arms on her neck and then they drove off.”

A NYPD spokesperson told Gothamist that the protester was charged with “multiple counts of vandalism and criminal mischief for five incidents in June and July,” which include painting graffiti inside the Oculus at the World Trade Center and on an F train, as well as “painting over four NYPD surveillance cameras.” On Twitter, the police department also claimed the officers were “assaulted with rocks and bottles” by onlookers.

Police often single out trans people and target them for violence. “Even with massive protests against police violence directed at trans people, it can be unsafe for trans people to protest for their own basic civil rights and protections,” Katelyn Burns wrote for Vox. Even if the woman had painted graffiti and painted police cameras, people pointed out the disproportionate use of force — multiple men grabbing her off the street and forcing her into an unmarked van — to the nonviolent property crime described by the NYPD.

At the time of the incident, about 200 people were leaving a plaza after stopping to watch a skateboarding event. The protest was part of a planned 24-hour action against the NYPD. NYC Council Speaker Corey Johnson called the video “incredibly disturbing.”

In a press conference Wednesday morning, Mayor Bill de Blasio was asked by Jake Offenhartz of Gothamist about the video and whether officers will be disciplined for their actions. “I don’t think this is about the officers,” de Blasio said. “The officers, members of the warrant squad going and arresting someone who has an outstanding warrant, is actually their job…I don’t think it’s a matter of discipline, it’s a matter of people understanding what is happening in this moment and making better choices about how to deal with things in this moment in history.” Refinery29 reached out to de Blasio’s office for a request for comment.

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

Armed Black Lives Matter Protestor Shot In Austin

Tom Cotton Compares Protestors To The Confederacy

NYPD Disbands Its Plainclothes Unit As A PR Stunt

More From

  • Venus Williams Wants You To Feel Like A Superhero In Her New Launch

    It’s only been three weeks since Venus Williams announced her clothing line EleVen’s new collection of tennis wear, yet the tennis star is already back with another exciting launch. On Thursday, Williams released a collection of athleticwear in collaboration with Wonder Woman, a pop culture icon that the athlete told People has always been a source of inspiration for her. In an interview with the publication, Williams likened her fans to the female superhero, saying that “they are strong, fierce women who are highly motivated and compassionate.” Now, with this collection, she hopes to make them feel like it. In addition to one of summer’s biggest trends, tennis skirts, the collection also includes cropped bra tops, bra-and-leggings set, and a catsuit embellished with tiny gold stars.> View this post on Instagram> > Inspired by strong, fierce women who are both competitive and compassionate, I designed the NEW Wonder Woman x @elevenbyvenus capsule collection because every woman should feel like Wonder Woman 💥 Shop our limited edition collection @ link in my bio> > A post shared by Venus Williams (@venuswilliams) on Aug 13, 2020 at 9:01am PDTEleVen by Venus Williams x Wonder Woman collection is actually just one piece of a larger initiative put together by Warner Bros. called WW84 that was created to garner excitement around the 2017 box-office hit Wonder Woman’s upcoming sequel, Wonder Woman 1984, which is set to be released on October 2, 2020. Other participating brands include Torrid, Miu Miu, and Lauren by Ralph Lauren, and more.  In addition to launching several fashion collections during quarantine (what have you been doing?), Williams has also been training for her long-awaited return to the tennis court, which took place at the inaugural Top Seed Open in Lexington, Kentucky, on Wednesday. In true Wonder Woman form, she beat her opponent, Victoria Azarenka, and advanced to the second round where she battled her younger sister Serena. In the end, it was Serena who came out victorious. But Venus did have a Wonder Woman collaboration to celebrate the next day, so really, everyone’s a winner.Shop all 10 pieces from the limited-edition EleVen x Wonder Woman collection now on elevenbyvenuswilliams.com.  Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Venus Williams Loves The Tennis Fashion TrendAlexis Ohanian Celebrates Serena WilliamsSerena Williams' Daughter Olympia Is A "Busy Baby"

  • Senate Leaves Congress Until September Without Reaching A Stimulus Deal

    Without reaching a deal on a fifth COVID-19 stimulus package, the Senate left Congress today for August recess until September 8th. For weeks, since senators first unveiled their proposal, top Democrats and Republicans have been arguing about the size of the stimulus, with Democrats envisioning a budget of over $3 trillion while Republicans wanted $1 trillion. Democrats have offered to cut their proposed budget by $1 trillion, which Republicans have refused.The primary negotiators — Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows — haven’t met in person to continue talks since last Friday.If talks resume and a deal is reached before Congress officially reconvenes, Senators would have 24 hours notice to return. The negotiations are stalling as millions of Americans are at risk of not being able to pay rent and facing evictions. The $600 federal unemployment boost expired in late July.President Trump signed a series of executive orders this past Saturday in lieu of a stimulus bill; it included a payroll tax deferral and, originally, a $400/week federal unemployment boost. But states would be on the hook to fund $100 of that $400 boost, and many currently don’t have the money to do so — a part of stimulus package negotiations revolved around how much more funding to give to states and local government budgets. On Tuesday, the White House reduced their planned unemployment boost to $300 a week. There are also questions around whether the president has the legal power to enact these executive orders. Because the executive order doesn’t apportion new funding for unemployment, instead redirecting funds from elsewhere, the money for this temporary boost is expected to dry up within 5 weeks or so.The House passed their more generous version of the fifth stimulus bill back in May.This story was originally published on July 28th, 2020.At long last, after months of frustration as we wondered whether more coronavirus relief was coming, Senate Republicans revealed yesterday a $1 trillion dollar stimulus proposal called the HEALS Act — standing for “Health, Economic Assistance, Liability Protection and Schools.” Here’s what’s included in it, and what Democrats are likely to push back on.Is there another direct stimulus payment? Yes. Republicans are proposing that Americans receive a second direct payment, and it’s going to be another $1,200. The income thresholds are staying the same, too; individuals with an adjusted gross income of $75,000 or less based on their most recent tax return will receive the full $1,200, while those with an income of over $99,000 will not receive anything. For joint filers, the income limit for a full payment is $150,000 and is phased out at $198,000. Previously, it was reported that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was considering a much lower income limit of $40,000, and possibly even a lower payment amount, but thankfully, that’s not the plan. The next stimulus payment will also address an oversight in the first one. In the previous CARES Act, people were supposed to get an extra $500 of stimulus money for each dependent they claimed on their 2019 taxes. But a loophole meant that dependents 17 years old and up weren’t eligible for the $500, leaving many college students excluded. The HEALS Act removes all age limits for dependents. To ensure that the IRS doesn’t send another $1 billion to deceased Americans, the bill also specifies that people who died before January 1st, 2020 can’t receive the payments, as well as “any individual in prison at the time Treasury processes the rebate.” It is not yet known when people will start receiving their next stimulus checks, but some estimates say they could start arriving in late August — only if Congress passes legislation as quickly as possible, though. What about the weekly $600 in unemployment? Will that be renewed? Federal unemployment insurance was expanded in the CARES Act to give people whose jobs have been affected by COVID-19 an extra $600 a week on top of their regular state unemployment benefits. This was called the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (FPUC), and technically this past weekend marked the last week of benefits before it expires.  Many economic experts have talked about the widespread hardship that the end of FPUC could bring, especially as eviction moratoriums have expired and many Americans face homelessness. The sudden income cliff may result in millions of people suddenly being unable to pay rent and bills. Thankfully, the HEALS Act doesn’t completely do away with supplemental federal unemployment altogether — but it’s a lot less than what it was. If this bill passes in its current form, Americans on unemployment will receive a maximum of 70% of lost wages starting October. That’s including state unemployment, and generally, state unemployment replaces less than 50% of lost wages. So if you usually made $500 a week and your state unemployment gives you $200, you’d get an extra $150 in federal unemployment. The federal unemployment benefits also can’t exceed $500. Until October, when this scheme would kick in, Americans would receive $200 a week as part of federal unemployment, just a third of what they were receiving up until last week. Vaccines, schools, small businesses, business meals Republicans have proposed $16 billion in funding for COVID-19 testing, as well as $26 billion to help develop a vaccine. It also provides $105 billion for schools and extends the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which initially set aside $669 billion in forgivable loans for small businesses. But the GOP has said that the next round of PPP loans would be limited to businesses who have lost at least 50% of revenue and have 300 employees or fewer, after data revealed that many not-so-small businesses had received the loan. There’s also a measure that allows people to deduct 100% of business meal expenses now, instead of just 50%. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has criticized its inclusion, pointing out that meanwhile, there had been nothing provided in terms of “food stamps or nutrition assistance.”Corporate liability protection A key part of the HEALS Act is its broad protection of corporate liability. It’s something McConnell has been especially insistent on — it’s even in the bill’s name — and over 20 conservative groups have been lobbying for it over the past several months. The provision shields companies from lawsuits brought by workers who claim that their employer did not adequately protect them from the coronavirus. According to the Associated Press, businesses would only be found liable in cases of “gross negligence or intentional misconduct,” which it notes is a high legal standard. It means that an employer wouldn’t be responsible for failing to “take reasonable precautions,” though what that exactly entails is hard to determine as of now. Such lawsuits have already become commonplace — as of early May, there were almost 800 COVID-19-related lawsuits filed. Amazon is currently being sued by three employees in New York who claim the company did not implement adequate safety measures. One of the most notorious examples of COVID-19 spread at work has been in meat processing facilities. CDC data says that about 9% of meat and poultry plant workers in 14 states have gotten COVID-19 so far. As of late June, according to the Food & Environment Reporting Network, over 8,000 Tyson employees were diagnosed with the virus. The families of three Iowa Tyson employees who died are currently suing the company, alleging that Tyson knew COVID-19 was spreading in its facilities and did not inform employees, in some cases even allowing sick or exposed employees to continue working. In the past few months, some of the biggest meat processing companies have lobbied politicians to pass federal liability protection, making large donations to lawmakers and interest groups. Many states, including Iowa, have already passed some form of COVID-19 immunity for businesses. In New York, Governor Andrew Cuomo inserted a sweeping provision protecting nursing home operators, including executives and board members, into his annual budget that passed in April. According to the New York Times, 40% of COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. have been linked to nursing homes. New York’s law is particularly relevant now because, as reported by journalist and former Bernie Sanders campaign advisor David Sirota, the language in the HEALS Act is lifted almost word-for-word from the New York law. In May, Republicans said they would refuse to pass any stimulus bill without liability protection. The conservative groups pushing for the law wrote a letter to McConnell and Pelosi back in April, condemning trial lawyers taking up COVID-19 lawsuits. “Their greed is hurting America in this time of crisis,” it read. Proponents of corporate liability protection have claimed that holding businesses responsible for spreading COVID-19 kills jobs and hurts the economy. The Democrats have already begun negotiations on the HEALS Act, but The Hill reports that Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer called the plan “pathetic.” Schumer and Pelosi are reportedly disappointed by the lack of state funding, rent assistance and eviction protections, as well as more targeted aid for low-income Americans. Their volley will probably be more expensive than $1 trillion. The Heroes Act, which was introduced by House Democrats in April, was budgeted at $3 trillion. The next stimulus bill has to pass by the end of next week, or Congress will go into August recess.Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Will The Stimulus Bill Pass By Next Week?Who Got Stimulus Checks First? Not Poor AmericansDid Your Stimulus Check Go To The Wrong Address?

  • Birtherism Will Always Be A Losing Strategy For Republicans

    The announcement of Kamala Harris as Joe Biden’s Vice Presidential pick has sent Republicans into a tailspin, and they’ve been checking all the squares on their racism BINGO cards with attempts to discredit her selection. From Tucker Carlson refusing to correctly pronounce Harris’s name to President Trump calling her names, the responses have been insulting — and predictable. One such attempt at invalidating Harris came from John Eastman, a law professor at Chapman University, who published an op-ed in Newsweek questioning whether Harris is eligible for the vice presidency based on her parents’ citizenship status at the time of her birth. The op-ed — thinly-veiled racist ideology disguised as a debate about Constitutional law — has drawn immense blowback for its premise. That’s because the essay is plain old “birtherism” wrapped up in an intellectual bow. Eastman’s argument is that the law requires all Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates to be “natural born citizens.” Under the 14th Amendment, Harris, who was born in Oakland, California, is a citizen of the U.S. even though her parents, who were from Jamaica and India, were not naturalized citizens at the time of her birth. Eastman claims that the second clause of the 14th Amendment, which says that citizens must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S., may disqualify Harris from eligibility. Many people have stated that this is false, including Laurence Tribe, a constitutional law professor at Harvard University.> Worse than nonsense, the garbage questioning the eligibility of Kamala Harris to serve as president is vicious and legally baseless BS. It’s racist birtherism redux. Shame on any media outlet that gives it space or airtime. https://t.co/FPYUKFcvKp> > — Laurence Tribe (@tribelaw) August 13, 2020Birtherism is a tactic Republicans have increasingly used to try and devalue or discredit people of color running for office. It began with Barack Obama’s campaign in 2008, with people — mostly Hillary Clinton supporters at first, but the theory was later co-opted by the GOP — claiming that Obama was ineligible for the presidency because he was born in Kenya and smuggled into the country as a baby, as outlined by POLITICO.Donald Trump has been one of the biggest proponents in promoting the conspiracy theory, the ideology of which was evident when he tweeted that “progressive Democratic Congresswomen” — namely Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, and Ayanna Pressley, all of whom are women of color — should “go back” to their home countries.For its part, Newsweek has stuck by the op-ed’s publication, issuing an Editor’s Note proclaiming that the piece has “no connection whatsoever to so-called ‘birther-ism.’” But whether Newsweek wants to call it birtherism or not, the truth is that the piece mirrors the conspiracy by making faux-intellectual arguments rooted in racist and xenophobic beliefs in an attempt to keep people of color out of positions of power. It’s dangerous rhetoric because it perpetuates the idea that any person of color who rises to power does not deserve to be there or has somehow gamed the system.As Adam Serwer wrote for The Atlantic, birther ideals, which stem from the belief that the people in charge of running the country should be white, are central to the success of the Trump campaign and to the actions of his administration: a desire “to turn back the clock to an era where white political and cultural hegemony was unthreatened by black people, by immigrants, by people of a different faith.”Birtherism is a last-gasp attempt by white people to hold onto white supremacy, by any means necessary, whether it be conspiracy theories about birth certificates or grasping at straws by parsing the language of Constitutional law hoping against hope there will be justification for excluding someone from power based on the color of their skin or their family’s heritage. In Eastman’s case, perhaps it’s professional jealousy: in 2010, Eastman and Harris both ran for California attorney general. Eastman, a Republican, lost in the primary to Steve Cooley. Harris, a Democrat, ultimately won, beating Cooley in the general election. Eastman has also represented the North Carolina legislature and the State of Arizona in unsuccessfully petitioning the Supreme Court in cases involving same-sex marriage, immigration, and abortion, all issues he holds opposing views than Harris on.While perhaps not a strictly personal vendetta on Eastman’s part, his argument — and ones like it — is an example of a white ruling class that cannot stand the reality that a Black woman might beat them at their own game, or have the career and positions they wanted for themselves or successfully challenge their worldview at the level of government.But ultimately, birtherism reveals more about the person espousing it than it does anyone else. It reveals the many Republican constituents who uphold this rhetoric as xenophobic, as backwards, and as unable to accept a changing power structure in this country. Most importantly, it reveals those who are unwilling to let go of the white supremacist system that has, for too long, kept people like them at the top with their boots on the rest of the world’s neck.Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Why Republicans Are Mispronouncing Kamala's NameMike Pence "Can't Wait" To Debate Kamala HarrisBiden & Harris Are A Dream Team, Astrologically

  • The Hair-Tool Organizers To Keep Your Irons (& More) In One Place

    Between hair dryers, brushes, and curling irons of varying widths, it’s easy for your vanity table to quickly become a cluttered mess of power cords and bulky tools. (And before a well-intentioned friend suggests we KonMari our collection, the answer is yes, they’re all absolutely necessary.) That's when a hair tool organizer comes to the rescue. Whether you’re looking to artfully display your collection or just want a practical way to improve access for day-to-day ease, we've got you. From options for the minimalist with a soft spot for acrylic organizers to ones that'll visually spruce up your beauty space, check out these eight affordable picks to find your hair-tool organization soulmate. At Refinery29, we’re here to help you navigate this overwhelming world of stuff. All of our market picks are independently selected and curated by the editorial team. If you buy something we link to on our site, Refinery29 may earn commission.Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?