• Home
  • Mail
  • News
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Search
  • Mobile
  • More
Yahoo
    • Skip to Navigation
    • Skip to Main Content
    • Skip to Related Content
    • Mail
    Lifestyle Home
    Follow Us
    • Style
    • Beauty
    • Wellness
    • Shopping
    • MAKERS
    • Holiday Guide for Guys
    • Pets
    • Video
    • Horoscopes
    • Pop Culture

    Meghan Markle accuses Daily Mail of making up 'absurd' stories about her

    Joe Gamp
    Contributor, Yahoo News UK
    Yahoo News UKNovember 15, 2019
    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share
    The Duchess of Sussex during a visit to the Field of Remembrance at Westminster Abbey in Westminster, London.
    View photos
    The Duchess of Sussex during a visit to the Field of Remembrance at Westminster Abbey in Westminster, London.

    Meghan Markle has reportedly accused The Mail on Sunday and its parent company of deliberately portraying a ‘false picture’ of her by publishing ‘fake news’.

    The Duchess, and husband Prince Harry, are suing Associated Newspapers for waging a ‘campaign of fake news information’ against her - including the publication of details from a private letter without her consent.

    The couple launched legal action in October alleging misuse of private information and infringement of copyright.

    According to a report by Byline Investigates, court papers have revealed details of Meghan’s High Court action against the newspaper group.

    One of the reports in the Mail
    View photos
    One of the reports in the Mail

    The filed document cites an extensive list of ‘false’ and ‘absurd’ stories published about her.

    The legal documents are said to outline eight stories published by Associated Newspapers that the couple claim are false. They include: an article claiming Meghan is “almost straight outta Compton”, which the couple claim is false; an article claiming that one of Meghan’s former aide’s walked out on the “difficult duchess”, with the couple insisting that long-time aide Samantha Cohen didn’t quit; and that Meghan and Harry bought a £5,000 copper bath, spent £500,000 on soundproofing their new home Frogmore Cottage, and also installed a yoga studio - none of which they say is accurate.

    The court documents reportedly say that “the clear intention was to portray the Claimant in a damaging light by suggesting that she had indulged in this series of absurdly lavish renovations”.

    The Duchess also says the Mail made false claims about her relationship with father, Thomas Markle.

    She cites the Mail claiming that she “did not ask about her father’s welfare” after a heart attack among other claims.

    Harry and Meghan in Johannesburg last month. (Dominic Lipinski/Pool via AP, File)
    View photos
    Harry and Meghan in Johannesburg last month. (Dominic Lipinski/Pool via AP, File)

    In one section of the document, Part 18 - a legal reply to questions from Associated Newspapers - her legal representatives said a letter Meghan wrote to her father had been edited to mislead readers, despite the Mail on Sunday claiming it had published the full letter.

    Schillings, the law firm representing Markle, has described the publication of her letter as part of a “campaign by this media group to publish false and deliberately derogatory stories about her, as well as her husband.

    “...We have issued proceedings to redress this breach of privacy, infringement of copyright and the aforementioned media agenda.” It did not give details about the letter in question or publication date.

    Read more:
    Piers Morgan brands Prince Harry 'over the top' for comparing Meghan Markle to Princess Diana
    Five scandals and tragedies that have broken while the Royal Family has been at Balmoral
    Harry and Meghan ‘take second private jet flight in a week’ amid carbon emissions criticism

    CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA - SEPTEMBER 24: Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex visits the Auwal Mosque during day two of their royal tour of South Africa on September 24, 2019 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo by TPool/Samir Hussein/WireImage)
    View photos
    CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA - SEPTEMBER 24: Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex visits the Auwal Mosque during day two of their royal tour of South Africa on September 24, 2019 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo by TPool/Samir Hussein/WireImage)

    On October 1, it emerged the couple had launched legal action against Associated Newspapers. Harry said in an emotional statement that the treatment of Meghan by sections of the British press was reminiscent of their approach to his mother Diana, who died in a car crash in 1997 after being followed through the streets of Paris by photographers.

    “My deepest fear is history repeating itself. I’ve seen what happens when someone I love is commoditised to the point that they are no longer treated or seen as a real person. I lost my mother and now I watch my wife falling victim to the same powerful forces.”

    In his statement, Prince Harry said the newspaper had “purposely misled (readers) by strategically omitting select paragraphs, specific sentences, and even singular words” from the letter.

    The Mail on Sunday denied the account.

    “The Mail on Sunday stands by the story it published and will be defending this case vigorously,” said a spokesman in October. “Specifically, we categorically deny that the Duchess’s letter was edited in any way that changed its meaning.”

    Yahoo News UK has contacted Associated Newspapers for comment on the latest claims.

    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share

    What to Read Next

    • Walmart Canada pulls 'Let It Snow' Christmas sweater featuring a cocaine-using Santa

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Bella Hadid Just Hit the Beach in a Seriously Revealing One-Piece Swimsuit

      Harper's Bazaar
    • Michelle Obama weighs in on President Trump impeachment hearings: ‘It’s surreal’

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Swe Zin Htet on being the first openly gay Miss Universe contestant: 'People in Myanmar are not accepting of this'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Two Women Landed in the ER After Using a Vacuum to End Their Periods, According to a Nurse's Scary Viral Tweet

      Meredith Videos
    • Catherine Zeta-Jones Posted an Emotional Tribute to Kirk Douglas on His 103 Birthday

      Country Living
    • Cardi B Covers 'Vogue' with Her Daughter Kulture

      Fashionista
    • Tarek El Moussa and Heather Rae Young Snap 'Family' Holiday Pic with Kids

      House Beautiful
    • Jennifer Lopez Ripped Off Her Tuxedo on ‘SNL’ to Reveal Her Iconic Versace Dress

      PureWow
    • 'Blue Bloods' Sparked a Wild Fan Theory About Eddie and Jamie After the Tense Fall Finale

      Country Living
    • Meghan Markle Was Unrecognizable During an Early Charity Visit in a Baseball Cap and Jacket

      InStyle
    • 'Fuller House' Fans Are Losing Their Minds Over All the Easter Eggs in Season 5

      Good Housekeeping
    • Kendall Jenner's Nude Minidress Looks Like It's Dripping in Tinsel

      Harper's Bazaar
    • Kelly Ripa and Daughter Lola Stepped Out in Complementary Mini Dresses

      InStyle
    • Dr. Pimple Popper Is Back With New Episodes — & We Have The Exclusive Trailer

      Refinery29
    • Cardi B wants an ‘extremely holy’ president: ‘I don’t want my president to entertain me’

      Yahoo Lifestyle

    'The evidence is overwhelming': Combative hearing moves House closer to impeachment

    Magic One: The Senate Trial is GOVERNED by the Senate Rules... and so is the Chairman during the Trial (Justice Roberts). This isn't a Criminal trial. The Senate Rules allow any group of 51 Senators to overrule the Chairman (Roberts) on many issues (like who will be subpoenaed to testify and who will not). If 51 (or more) Senators want to have Joe Biden, Adam Schiff, and Hunter Biden testify but the Chairman (Roberts) refuses, the Senators can overrule him and send the subpoenas and they WILL testify. Equally, if 51 Senators do NOT want someone to be subpoenaed to testify, they can quash the subpoena and stop them from testifying. "If the Senate did end up conducting a trial, Rule VII gives Chief Justice Roberts control over procedural aspects of the trial, including issuing orders for specific people to testify and making decisions about disputed points of the law. However, that same rule lets McConnell circumvent Roberts’ control, potentially in ways that could limit, or expand, the impeachment process. For instance, if the House members presenting the case wanted to subpoena a witness who might give evidence against Trump, senators could ask Roberts to block the subpoena. If he refused, they could overrule him, again by a simple majority in a Republican-controlled Senate. McConnell could also use Rule VII to introduce into the trial new information that would be to Trump’s political benefit – such as asking Roberts to subpoena Joe Biden and his son Hunter, which could heighten the partisan divide, and distract or confuse the public about who is on trial for what. If Roberts declined, again the senators themselves could vote to issue the subpoenas." ================================= "Critically, and contrary to common mythology and parlance, the chief justice is not the “judge” in an impeachment trial. The Senate itself is both judge and trier of fact, and the chief justice serves as its presiding officer. The rules thus require the chief justice to direct “all forms of the proceedings” (Rule 7) and, in so doing, “to make and issue all orders, mandates, writs, and precepts authorized by the rules” (Rule 5)." The Republicans hold the Senate Majority and can easily get 51 votes to overrule Roberts... with votes to spare.

    Join the Conversation
    1 / 5

    8.2k

    • Emma Stone Debuted Her Pearl Engagement Ring at the 'SNL' After-Party

      Harper's Bazaar
    • This local hardware store’s $130 commercial is being dubbed ‘the best Christmas ad of the year'

      In The Know
    • Dwayne Johnson Has Mixed Feelings About Still Being Called "The Rock"

      Good Housekeeping
    • I'm Sorry, Your Scented Holiday Candles Make Me Want to Scream

      House Beautiful
    • "Milky Nails" Are the Manicure Trend You're Going to See All Throughout 2020

      Allure
    • Miley Cyrus Just Got a Meaningful New Tattoo

      Vogue
    • Camila Cabello Just Joked That Shawn Mendes Might Break Up With Her

      Seventeen
    • We’re Obsessed With This Recyclable Material That Looks Just Like Terrazzo

      House Beautiful
    • Abandoned 5-Year-Old Carries Toddler in Extreme Cold After Adult Allegedly Left Them in Home

      People
    • Act fast! The Instant Pot DUO Plus is 50 percent off

      In The Know
    • Olivia Wilde talks about kindness of strangers during son's 'level 10' meltdown

      Yahoo Lifestyle Videos
    • Teacher suspended for bragging that he would 'be the best school shooter'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • This couple did their first look at the groom's mother's grave, and the photos will probably make you cry

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • 'My daughter beat cancer twice — and she's only 6 years old'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Lizzo sparked a Twitter debate after wearing a revealing outfit to a Lakers game

      Hello Giggles
    • 'It's long overdue:' After T.I.'s controversial 'hymengate,' NY lawmakers hope to ban 'virginity testing'

      Yahoo Lifestyle