John Kasich Is Not Going To Unite Democrats — Or Anyone, Really

Brianna Provenzano

During the fourth Democratic presidential debate in October 2019, in response to a line of questioning about his son Hunter Biden’s conduct on the board of an energy company in Ukraine, former Vice President Joe Biden took an opportunity to remind voters that the real corruption was coming from inside the White House.

“The fact of the matter is that this is about [President Donald] Trump’s corruption,” Biden said. “That’s what we should be focusing on.”

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders disagreed.

“I think it would be a disaster if the American people believed that all we were doing is taking on Trump and we’re forgetting that 87 million Americans are uninsured or underinsured, the existential threat of climate change, the fact that half of our people are living paycheck to paycheck,” he said.

On a debate stage that at the time held 12 candidates vying for the Democratic presidential nomination, the exchange catalogued the stark ideological divide between the two men who would emerge as the final contenders in the race to take on Trump in 2020. For Sanders, the chief issue is the structural threat to America’s working class, which has existed since long before Trump took office. For Biden, the greatest current danger to the American people is Trump himself — and he must be stopped at all costs.

As Joe Biden prepares to clinch the Democratic nomination, the Associated Press reported on Monday that former Ohio Gov. John Kasich, a Republican and frequent critic of Trump, has been tapped to speak on his behalf at the Democratic National Convention next month. While it’s unclear whether or not the Kasich appearance will serve as an official endorsement, the move is clearly designed to further the campaign strategy that Biden has been laying the groundwork for since the earliest days of his candidacy. If the former Vice President has been propped up as a smiling, glad-handing alternative to the president, and not a pathway to any real progressive change, it makes sense to ensure that the circus tent is big enough to hold the large swaths of the GOP establishment Republicans who are already scrambling to distance themselves from the president. 

An appearance by Kasich would also be firmly in line with the grand Democratic tradition of fetishizing “good Republicans” — so-called moderates who, like Kasich, echo their own centrist appeals for decorum and common decency. It’s the same strategy Hillary Clinton often deployed during her own presidential run in 2016, which many of her left-leaning critics believe may have cost her the election.

During his time as the governor of Ohio, Kasich implemented some of the strictest anti-abortion policies in the country, all of them aimed at limiting the scope of women’s healthcare providers in the state. In 2016, he signed a bill that effectively stripped Planned Parenthood of $1.3 million in state funding, impacting the ability of an estimated 54,665 Ohio women to access vital services like cancer screenings and other vital, life-saving services. Later that year, he signed into law a bill banning abortion after 20 weeks, with no exceptions for rape, incest, or fetal anomaly — considered to be one of the most extreme abortion bans in the country, then or since.

“Kasich is a wolf in sheep’s clothing,” Kellie Copeland, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio, told Mother Jones in 2015. “He’s going out there trying to sell himself as a moderate, he’s no moderate. He is an extremist. He is—if not the worst—among the worst of anti-choice governors in this country’s history.”

If Kasich is a “moderate,” tell that to the pregnant women who have had to scramble across state lines as a result of his draconian 20-week abortion ban. If Kasich’s appearance alongside the Democratic presidential nominee at the DNC represents no threat to the very base that the party exists to protect, tell that to the members of the LGBTQ+ community whom he told to “take a breath and calm down” amid the spread of anti-gay legislation throughout the South. 

The internal logic of this decision by the Biden campaign is as facile as it is unambiguous: Donald Trump is the Big Bad, and all those who oppose him are on their side. It doesn’t matter that Kasich passed a 2013 budget that banned rape crisis counselors from referring victims of sexual assault to abortion services; he wears dad jeans and speaks in broad platitudes about wanting a “United States, not the divided states,” and, most importantly, he thinks Trump is unfit to serve in the Oval Office. 

For the Biden campaign, and for the Democratic Party political machine as a whole, politics is a cynical, superficial game, and their sales pitch has not changed: This fall, do you want a red tie in the White House, or a blue one?

Don’t forget to register to vote.

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

What Progressive Election Wins & Losses Mean

Trump's Attack On Mail-In Voting Helps No One

Is Kayleigh McEnany Just Trump's Mouthpiece?

More From

  • The Hair-Tool Organizers To Keep Your Irons (& More) In One Place

    Between hair dryers, brushes, and curling irons of varying widths, it’s easy for your vanity table to quickly become a cluttered mess of power cords and bulky tools. (And before a well-intentioned friend suggests we KonMari our collection, the answer is yes, they’re all absolutely necessary.) That's when a hair tool organizer comes to the rescue. Whether you’re looking to artfully display your collection or just want a practical way to improve access for day-to-day ease, we've got you. From options for the minimalist with a soft spot for acrylic organizers to ones that'll visually spruce up your beauty space, check out these eight affordable picks to find your hair-tool organization soulmate. At Refinery29, we’re here to help you navigate this overwhelming world of stuff. All of our market picks are independently selected and curated by the editorial team. If you buy something we link to on our site, Refinery29 may earn commission.Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

  • Only 7% of White Workers Believe Racism Exists In Their Workplace

    When the George Floyd protests began in late May, it seemed like many companies and industries around the country were suddenly engaged in a “reckoning” about how racism organizes the structures of their workplaces. But a new report released by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) reveals how much (or, rather, how little) that recognition has really sunk in: only 13% of white HR professionals say they believe discrimination based on race or ethnicity exists in their workplace. (The report surveyed 1,257 Americans from June 11th to June 17th, 2020.) It’s disturbing to see that so few of the professionals who have such an outsize role in recruiting, interviewing, and hiring at companies believe that racism exists within their own walls. The SHRM report found that 49% of Black HR professionals, meanwhile, believe that racial discrimination exists at their workplace. Of all human resource managers, according to 2019 Bureau of Labor Statistics data, 77.8% are white, and just 11.1% are Black. The report also surveyed U.S. workers in general, not just HR professionals. Among white, non-HR workers, just 7% say that racism exists in their workplace. Among Black workers, 35% say the same. White HR professionals reported that gender discrimination was a problem in much higher numbers than racial discrimination, with 22% saying it exists in their workplace. Part of the issue seems to be the specificity of words like “racism” or “discrimination.” When asked whether their organization is doing enough to “provide opportunities for Black employees,” 35% of white HR professionals and 68% of Black HR professionals say no. The report also found that 33% of Black workers say they don’t feel respected or valued at work, compared to 18% of white workers who feel that way. Moreover, 45% of Black workers say that their managers don’t support talking about race, the same proportion of Black workers that say their workplace overall discourages conversations around race.It’s apparent that there’s severe discomfort around talking about race — 37% of both white and Black workers said they didn’t feel comfortable discussing it, with 42% of white workers going so far as to say it’s inappropriate to talk about race at work. HR professionals have a much different view, with 70% saying that discussions about race are appropriate at work. After all, if even just talking about it remains taboo, how can workers have an accurate grasp on whether racism manifests in their workplace?Workers more readily acknowledge that racism is a problem in general society, with 54% of Black workers and 29% of white workers saying that their workplace doesn’t do enough to “promote racial justice in the world” — but fewer workers will admit it’s a problem in their own workplace, impacting their everyday lives. These survey results provide greater context for the slew of black squares posted on Instagram in June and the sudden corporate support of the Black Lives Matter movement in the weeks after the police killing of George Floyd. Many companies, including Refinery29, were questioned on their sincerity in putting forward those messages, especially after former and current employees came forward about anti-Black racism they’d experienced in the workplace.To Black and other non-white workers across the country, this report may simply come as a confirmation of their experiences. After all, we’ve watched as some companies have shown a shocking unwillingness to make amends for objectively racist policies — even when it’s in their best interest to do so. After it was revealed that food magazine Bon Appétit, which is owened by Conde Nast, was underpaying its BIPOC staff, there were immediate calls for equal pay, as well as redress for other racist acts employees have faced. An internal investigation was launched, and for months, no new videos were uploaded to BA’s extremely popular YouTube channel, which is operated through Conde Nast Entertainment. Last week, writer Priya Krishna announced that she will no longer appear in videos, because the new contracts she and her colleague Rick Martinez were offered would still pay less than what their white colleagues are paid. To date, six BA staff members have announced they will no longer participate in the magazine’s YouTube videos.It’s clear that American companies as a whole need to be more proactive in addressing racism within their walls — and the first step to achieving that is unequivocally acknowledging the presence of it. The SHRM report reveals that the vast majority of workplaces (67%) haven’t gauged where their own employees stand on these issues. And while 52% of workplaces claim they plan on implementing some kind of implicit bias training, only 30% say they will adjust or expand “policies and systems” in an attempt to reduce racist bias.Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?What Calling Racism A Public Health Crisis MeansLayla Saad On BLM, Allyship, & Racist WorkplacesEmployers Need To Do Better For Black Women

  • Is Sustainable Loungewear The Future Of Fashion?

    Six months ago, the only thing that would get me to even look at a matching sweatsuit was Zoë Kravitz — wearing one (from Entireworld) underneath a moss-green Loewe duster. Now, I, and just about everyone else on the planet, hardly go a few days without slipping one on. Like shoes with heels, non-stretch denim, and dresses that don’t fall under Hill House Home’s Nap dress category, anything that’s not elastic, monochrome, and made of jersey simply doesn’t suit my dressing needs anymore. That’s what happens when a pandemic ushers most of the population indoors for half a year’s time: we bunker down and get comfortable. But comfort level isn’t the only variable we look at when shopping for loungewear these days. Instead, the farther we get into the pandemic, and the more we see how our everyday behaviors, from plane, train, and car travel to our fashion consumption habits, contribute to the environment’s demise — in March, the BBC reported that pollution in New York alone was down 50% year-over-year due to a reduced number of cars on the road — the more focused we are on shopping ethically and sustainably. Gen Z, in particular, wants a future on this planet, and many are willing to give up fast fashion to get it. Enter: ethical and sustainable loungewear, which is currently experiencing a rise. “Gen Z are looking for purpose above anything else — they are a generation deeply concerned and moved by socio-environmental issues,” says Dr. Amanda Parkes Ph.D, Chief Innovations Officer at PANGAIA, a sustainable fashion collective that offers seasonless loungewear crafted out of bio-engineered materials. “They care, they believe in the power of the collective, and they are willing to adapt their lifestyles to help both people and the planet.” > View this post on Instagram> > A post shared by PANGAIA (@thepangaia) on May 10, 2020 at 7:00am PDTNext week, the brand is announcing a collaboration with JUST Water, the environmentally-friendly consumer products brand co-founded by Jaden Smith (aka the unofficial ruler of Gen Z), made up of a nine-piece line of loungewear. The collection, which includes sweatpants, sweat shorts, hoodies, crewnecks, and T-shirts in JUST Water’s signature blue colorway, was created using 100% GOTS-certified organic cotton, natural dyes, and a recycled water system. What’s more, funds raised from the collection will be donated to TOGETHERFUND x Will & Jade Smith Family Foundation, a nonprofit that supports racial justice work and COVID-19 relief. While a PANGAIA x JUST collaboration may appear unexpected, given that the two are from different industries entirely, they share a common purpose of protecting those natural resources that we still have. PANGAIA’s business model, too, is different from what we’ve come to expect from brands — described as a collective, it’s made up of “scientists, designers, thinkers, and creators from all backgrounds and walks of life,” according to Parkes. To ensure that their products are being made using the most up-to-date technology, this collective connects MIT, Harvard, and Stanford alumni with designers from leading global design schools. As such, PANGAIA is at the forefront of both fashion and sustainable technology right now. “PANGAIA is very much aligned with Gen Z values — which is probably why we have such a strong presence of Gen Z in our community,” Parkes says. “We share their vision of a better world and their drive towards helping shape it.” A-list fans like Hailey Bieber and Jaden Smith no doubt help, too.In addition to PANGAIA, dozens of other ethical and sustainable loungewear brands have hit peak popularity since stay-at-home orders began in March. According to a viral The New York Times feature about sweatpants in the age of coronavirus, loungewear brand Entireworld has seen unprecedented growth during the pandemic. Following a “distinctly human” email in March that was sent by the brand’s CEO and founder Scott Sternberg to its 30,000 subscribers, Entireworld’s e-commerce site, which normally reports roughly 46 sweatpant orders per day, sold more than 1,000 pairs. “By month’s end, the brand’s sales were up 662 percent over March the previous year,” Sternberg told the publication. Like PANGAIA, Entireworld uses sustainable materials like organic cotton and recycled polyester to craft their signature crewnecks, shorts, socks, and joggers. A “strict set of criteria” is used for choosing suppliers and factories to work with to ensure that each and every Entireworld garment is made ethically. Also like PANGAIA, Entireworld’s business model is unlike many brand., Not only is it direct-to-consumer but it focuses on seasonless staples, rather than trends. Of the traditional fashion model, which includes a constant churning of collections and wholesale accounts, Sternberg told the publication that the “whole channel is dead. And there’s no sign of when it’s turning on again.” Maybe the age of sustainable loungewear will be born out of its ashes.Other loungewear brands like Cotton Citizen and Lacausa have been implementing sustainable practices since their very conceptions, too, using natural dyes, local factories, and, in, the case of Lacausa, additionally donating to nonprofits like the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Surfrider, and Cool Earth, which works alongside rainforest communities to halt deforestation. There’s also Baserange, a Dutch-French loungewear and underwear brand that’s committed to clean production, and Philadelphia-based Wol-Hide which designs comfortable and conscious pieces for everyday wear. Ever since the climate crisis reached “the point of no return back in 2015,” as Parkes puts it, “more and more people are becoming conscious of the urgency of the situation and committing to changing their behavior and purchasing habits.” The pandemic has only sped up those changes and commitments. And as conscious consumers continue to look for ways to put their money where their mouth is, it’s sustainably-minded businesses that will make the cut. Given that many people will not be going back to their offices until next year, the end of the loungewear boom is nowhere in sight. But that doesn’t mean that every brand under the sun should stop what they’re doing and jump on the sweatpants bandwagon, at least not before considering how they’re going to do so, from materials to supply chain, packaging, and beyond. After all, no matter how far off it may seem, the pandemic will eventually cease to exist. And when that happens — subsequently forcing us out of our crewnecks and into “normal” attire again — it won’t be just any loungewear brands that people remember, but rather those that not only invested in our comfort but also the comfort of generations that follow.At Refinery29, we’re here to help you navigate this overwhelming world of stuff. All of our market picks are independently selected and curated by the editorial team. If you buy something we link to on our site, Refinery29 may earn commission.Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Iets frans… Is Our Go-To For Affordable Loungewear3,000 People Bought This Sold-Out Terry LoungewearMatching Sweatsuits Became The Quarantine Uniform

  • This Black Women’s Equal Pay Day, I Want To Be Paid What I’m Owed

    One of my favorite sayings is, “know your worth, then add tax to it.” As an undergraduate student at Hampton University, I said it during the on-stage question portion of a pageant I competed in and the crowd went crazy. The funny thing is, I don’t really know my worth — not in terms of respect or how I should be treated emotionally — but my literal price. I know that I’m a Black woman with two journalism degrees and a lot of experience, but I don’t know how to translate my resume into numbers behind a dollar sign.On March 31 of this year, “Equal Pay Day” was acknowledged on social media via infographics, articles, videos, and a host of other mediums. I didn’t repost any of the above, because I’m not represented in that specific fight. According to the National Committee on Pay Equity, this date represents “how far into the year women must work to earn what men earned in the previous year.” Again, this does not include Black women like me. Black Women’s Equal Pay Day is August 13, because that’s approximately how far into the new year we would have to work to make that of a non-Hispanic white man at the end of last year. For every dollar that he’d make, said cluster of “all women” make 82 cents, while Black women make 62 cents.When I found this out, I was shook, but I wasn’t surprised. My elders informed me I’d always have to work twice, if not three times as hard to get half of the reward, because I’m a double minority. My parents and grandparents weren’t too far off. We, as Black women, must work about 1.6 times as hard — equivalent to 19 months — to get paid the same wage as men, and it’d take 257 years to close this gap at the rate we’re going. It wouldn’t surprise me if society looks to us to close it, either.  Since the beginning of time, Black women have had to carry the weight of the world on our shoulders, with ease, and without complaint. Time and time again, we’re expected to show up — at work, in relationships, in our families. 81 percent of Black mothers are the breadwinners in their families. As we’re the poster women for Alicia Keys’ Grammy Award-winning song, “Superwoman,” society fails to realize that we don’t and can’t wear S’s on our chests — especially since we’re constantly given the short end of the stick.  I often see Instagram posts followed by “BlackGirlMagic” when reading that Black women are the most educated group in the US, and that’s amazing. But who cares if we attempt to use said education, and can barely pay off our student loans because we’re not paid enough? White women — regardless of their education level — still make more than Black women among full-time, year-round workers.I recall my parents encouraging me to go straight from undergrad to grad school (which I did), because those with advanced degrees likely make more. As true as that may be, here’s another heart wrenching stat: the higher education obtained, the larger the gap. A Black woman, like me, with an advanced degree is set to face a 35 percent wage gap, compared to a Black woman with less than a high school diploma who’s set to face a 27 percent gap. As a recent grad who has only had internships, I don’t have much guidance on what’s a good starting salary and what’s not. Searching for my first job amid a pandemic has been far from easy, and the million-dollar question on my applications asks about salary. I’m not entirely sure what to ask for because I don’t want to appear greedy, but I also don’t want to lowball myself.  Upon graduating from Syracuse with my master’s, I planned to move to NYC and begin my journalism career. I found out I was a finalist for numerous jobs and fellowships in January, and by the time interviews were conducted, COVID-19 came with a vengeance. Jobs were no longer hiring or put on “an indefinite hold.” Now, as the job industry comes off its freeze, I wonder: “Who am I to ask for a potentially outlandish salary when company XYZ has been losing over the last five-ish months?” and “If I can’t be paid for my talents, then should they really hire me?” I’m blindly stepping into the industry with those burdens in addition to being a Black woman who likely won’t get paid what she’s worth — or anything near her counterparts. And if I needed to ask for better pay,  how would I begin to properly address that with my superiors without appearing to be the “angry Black woman?” It feels almost impossible.Attempting to have such a conversation reminds me of an episode of one of my favorite shows. On Insecure, Yvonne Orji’s character, Molly, accidentally received her white male co-worker’s paycheck, discovering he makes a lot more than she does, though he put in the same amount of time. Based on data from the Economic Policy Institute, a Black woman who’s a lawyer, like Molly in the show, makes about 78 cents on the dollar, compared to her white male counterpart. And like Molly, many Black women have knowledge of the situation, but know that there is little to nothing that can be done.So, do we just emotionally and economically keep ourselves down? Of course not, but even if we did speak up, nothing is changed. As a whole, women ask for raises or promotions at the same rate as men, but aren’t granted them. Still, this issue is deeper than not receiving a salary increase. Over a Black woman’s entire career, she loses nearly a million dollars — $941,600 — to be exact. Getting over this hump is a task within itself, and according to social media, the topic simply needs to be less taboo.I agree that this is a conversation that needs to be had. I’m also sick of Black women’s issues needing to be a “conversation” when some things should just be understood. It shouldn’t be a Black woman’s job to educate or fight with an employer about — not a raise or promotion — but to simply be paid equally. If we’re working the same job, with the same hours, why wouldn’t we get paid the same wage? With the combined discriminatory past both directly and systemically, I haven’t had my first job, yet, and I’m already tired. This isn’t and shouldn’t be up for debate. We shouldn’t need to have to prove that we deserve what we’ve worked for. Equal pay should be as simple as Rihanna’s lyrics: “pay me what you owe me.” And that’s just that. Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?