JK Rowling, ruiner of childhoods: why 'woke' Harry Potter fans have turned on their idol

Ed Power
JK Rowling in 2018 - WireImage
JK Rowling in 2018 - WireImage

The internet has turned into a Rowling inferno after a series of tweets by the creator of Harry Potter were labelled “transphobic”.

“If sex isn’t real, there’s no same-sex attraction,” JK Rowling wrote to her 14.5 million social media followers. "If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased. I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isn’t hate to speak the truth”.

This was the follow-up to an earlier tweet in which Rowling had rhetorically wondered if there was a word for “people who menstruate”. “I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?” 

An outcry ensued, with a huge proportion of those weighing in against her belonging to the same millennial generation which came of age reading Harry Potter. Among those taking issue were  actresses and activists Sarah Paulson and Jameela Jamil. Paulson approvingly retweeted a description by activist Ben O'Keefe of Rowling as “ complete scum” and which urged her to “shut the f--k up you transphobic f--k”. And Jamil noted Rowling was speaking out in the midst of global Black Lives Matter protests.

“Hey JK as you claim to support trans rights and this is a historical moment where we are globally discussing the impact of white supremacy on Black People, please share some of your $650million mega wealth with this charity.”

Rowling wasn’t taking such comments lying down, however, and accused her critics of misogyny. “‘Feminazi’, ‘TERF’, ‘bitch’, ‘witch’,” she tweeted.  “Times change. Woman-hate is eternal.”

Nor was she left completely twisting the wind though. Tennis icon Martina Navratilova defended Rowling, tweeting to one of the writer’s critics, “I am sorry if you think speaking up for a level playing field for girls and women in sports is hurtful. What is hurtful is saying to girls and women to just try harder…”

This isn’t the first occasion the Harry Potter author has caught flack for her stance on trans rights. But her opinions have come under greater scrutiny with the surprise announcement last month of new Rowling book for children The Ickabog

She has already made the first two chapters available for free online. She will add further excerpts ahead of a print version in November. It’s her first non-adult book since Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in 2007. And if aimed at a slightly younger age-group than Potter – aged seven to nine is Rowling’s recommendation – it nonetheless marks the return to active service of a titan of children’s literature. 

By rights, the Potter-verse should be in a tizzy. Rowling’s news that she was dusting down the story, originally written for her own children over a decade ago, has certainly generated headlines. However, there is little of the mass swooning that greeted each new Potter novel through the early 2000s. Whatever the virtual equivalent of queuing all day for a midnight book launch is, it certainly hasn’t manifested for The Ickabog.

JK Rowling with the Harry Potter cast in 2001
JK Rowling with the Harry Potter cast in 2001

Then, Harry Potter fans are no longer quite the loyal army of yore. For millennials raised on the coming-of-age adventures of Harry, Hermione and Ron Rowling has, at 54, become a complicated and controversial figure. 

She loomed throughout their childhoods, and for some she was arguably a defining influence. Harry Potter helped them negotiate the complicated journey into adolescence and out the other side. As Harry muddled his way into adulthood, so did they. But many, though certainly not all, have now turned their backs on Rowling. How has she gone from Hogwarts to Hognoughts so quickly? 

One theory is that, by current standards of left-leaning internet discourse, Rowling is insufficiently “woke”. There was an outcry last December when she tweeted her support for Maya Forstater in her case of wrongful dismissal against thinktank Centre for Global Development. 

Forstater was accused of tweeting and retweeting dehumanising statements about trans people. Her contract was not renewed and she sued. An employment judge ruled her views were “not worthy of respect in democratic society”. Rowling had by that point already weighed in, tweeting “Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like…But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real?“

This went down like a streaker at a Quidditch match. Patricia Arquette, the Hollywood star, tweeted at Rowling: “I am not afraid of being raped by a trans woman in fact I’m afraid FOR trans women as they have the highest likelihood of being raped in any group. I’m afraid of rapist who are -everywhere sadly”.

The sentiments were echoed by Andy Lassner, editor of the Ellen DeGeneres show. He wrote to Rowling, “With all due respect, my guess is Maya will be just fine and doesn’t need anyone to stand with her. Trans folks, however, are among the most vulnerable and marginalised people in the world. I choose to stand with them.”

That was just the start of the palaver. Many Potter fans said their ability to enjoy Rowling’s work had been diminished. A few more or less declared their childhoods retroactively ruined. “Never thought I would say this but here we are…F**k you, J.K,” was the response of one disillusioned Potter partisan. 

“She's an aggressive biological essentialist and vocally supports known transphobes and their beliefs,” went a scorching piece in hipster bible, Vice. “It's the latest stage of the slow-burning deepening estrangement between Harry Potter readers and a woman who has often been as ill-suited to the role of pop culture celebrity as she is eager to play it.”

People may agree or disagree over whether Rowling is an “aggressive biological essentialist”. But Vice was absolutely correct about the “slow-burning cultural estrangement” between Rowling and the progressive 20 and 30-somethings who grew up on Potter .

Zoe Kravitz and Johnny Depp in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
Zoe Kravitz and Johnny Depp in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

This generational recoil from Rowling has been building quite a while. There was disquiet in 2017 when she defended the casting of Johnny Depp as evil wizard Grindelwald in the second Fantastic Beasts movie, the Crimes of Grindelwald. Depp had been unveiled amid allegations of domestic abuse (which he has consistently denied). 

“Based on our understanding of the circumstances,” Rowling wrote “the film-makers and I are not only comfortable sticking with our original casting but genuinely happy to have Johnny playing a major character in the movies.”

She was accused of “straight-washing” and “queer-baiting” in the same film, in which Jude Law was cast as the young Dumbledore. The charge was the Crimes of Grindelwald glossed over Dumbledore’s sexuality, after Rowling had revealed on Twitter in 2007 that he was gay. In an interview for the BluRay release of the Crimes of Grindelwald she elaborated that Law and Depp’s characters had had an “incredibly intense” sexual relationship. Yet none of that was apparent on screen. Tellingly, Crimes of Grindelwald was the lowest grossing Potterverse film to date.

“JK Rowling Confirms Some Characters in Her Books and Movies Are Gay Everywhere Except in the Books or the Movies,” responded critic Eric B Snyder. 

“People are rightly taking the p**s out of JK Rowling for her ridiculous post publishing announcements about Dumbledore's sexuality & imaginary sex life,” went another tweet. “Unless there's an editor's note or some gay sex scene she was forced to cut out then she's simply vying for attention”.

With the backlash building, critics began to look more closely at her bibliography. Accusations of transphobia were again levelled over the trans character Pippa in her 2014 Cormoran Strike detective novel, The Silk Worm. According to Vice, “Rowling's narration is consistently othering and patronising towards Pippa as a trans woman”. You can imagine how that went over on social media. 

She has also annoyed Twitter by incorporating non-Western culture into the Potter-verse. Native American communities accused her of cultural appropriation in 2016 when she repurposed the Navajo legend of “skinwalker” shapeshifters in her online series, History of Magic in North America. Another clamour went up as she invoked the ancient Indonesian demon spirit of the “Naga” in the Crimes of Grindelwald with a character called Nagini

The issue was the Nagini was portrayed by a Korean actress (Claudia Kim) when the Naga legend had come to Indonesia from India. 

“Rowling has not only paid no attention to the fact that her character’s name is of Indic origin,” went a critical piece in the English-language Indian website Scroll.in. “But as a creator, an author, she has also, once again, appointed herself as a supreme authority, forgetting that many of her “creations” owe a huge debt to histories of subjugation that continue to play a role in the “real” world.”

Amid all this, Potter-heads have been re-reading Harry’s escapades in a new light. Offence has been taken over Chinese character "Cho Chang" – which many consider too close to the ethnic slur of Ching Chong for comfort. And there is disquiet over the subservient position of Potter’s elves and the mocking depiction of a “Society for the Promotion of Elfish Welfare”. There were mutterings of anti-semitism, too, around her the goblin banking dynasty, the Gringotts. 

Her age has also become a factor. When in 2018 Rowling “liked” a tweet accusing trans women of being “men in dresses” her publicist dismissed it as “a middle aged” moment – which apparently meant that she clicked by accident. She has also predictably been labelled a “Karen” – a social media caricature of white middle-class women as privileged and prejudiced.

Whether or not “Karen” is sexist or ageist is a debate for another time. Still, it’s hard to look past the fact that when people object to something that, for instance, Stephen King has tweeted, their comments are directed at the substance of what he is saying, not at King himself. He isn’t attacked for his age or gender. By contrast, you will read tweets wondering whether the “K” in Rowling “stands for Karen”. 

The backlash against Rowling is clearly coloured by anger and a deeply-felt sense of betrayal. As already pointed out, for millennials, Rowling and her writing are bound up in the fabric of their formative years. Much of what they learned about the world and about growing up was gleaned from Harry Potter and his adventures.

Now, in adulthood, they have discovered that the person who gave them Harry is not some font of infinite wisdom but an ordinary person with opinions with which they may or may not agree. Can they ever forgive Rowling for being a middle-aged woman with feet of clay?

More From

  • Mt Rushmore speech: Donald Trump vows tougher measures for protesters who seek to 'defame' heroes

    Speaking to a largely maskless crowd at Mt Rushmore, President Donald Trump said on Saturday that protesters have waged "a merciless campaign to wipe out our history" amid demonstrations against racial injustice and police brutality. The sharp rebuke in a holiday address to mark the nation's independence follows weeks of protests across the nation, sparked by the Memorial Day killing of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis. Some demonstrators have also destroyed or damaged Confederate monuments and statues honouring those who have benefited from slavery. "This movement is openly attacking the legacies of every person on Mt Rushmore," Mr Trump said, adding that some on the political left hope to "defame our heroes, erase our values, and indoctrinate our children". His speech, intended to rev up his conservative base, comes as Mr Trump has seen his standing slump over his handling of the coronavirus pandemic and response to protests and unrest around the country. With four months until the US presidential election, Mr Trump's hopes for a second term - once buoyed by low unemployment and a roaring stock market - seem uncertain. Amid the headwinds, Mr Trump has sharpened his focus on his most ardent base of supporters as concern grows inside his campaign that his poll numbers in the battleground states that will decide the 2020 election are slipping. Mr Trump in recent weeks has increasingly lashed out at "left-wing mobs", used a racist epithet to refer to coronavirus and visited the nation's southern border to spotlight progress on his 2016 campaign promise to build a US-Mexico border wall. The event, while not a campaign rally, had the feel of one as the friendly crowd greeted Mr Trump with chants of "Four more years!" and cheered enthusiastically as he and first lady Melania Trump took to the stage. "Those who seek to erase our heritage want Americans to forget our pride and our great dignity, so that we can no longer understand ourselves or America's destiny," Mr Trump said.

  • Justin Trudeau investigated by ethics watchdog over award of government contract to charity linked with his family

    Canada's ethics watchdog has launched an investigation into Justin Trudeau after a controversial contract to manage a major government program was awarded to a charity with links to the prime minister's family. Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion tweeted that he had "informed" Mr Trudeau of the decision. His investigation is confidential and will be the subject of a report once it is completed. The announcement came after the co-founders of WE Charity, Craig Kielburger and Marc Kielburger, said they were withdrawing from the program, which they said had "been enmeshed in controversy from the moment of its announcement." Mr Trudeau's government had announced in late June that it was awarding the organisation the management of the 900 million Canadian dollars (£531 million) federal program, which provides grants of up to $5,000 to eligible students for volunteer work with non-profit organisations during the coronavirus pandemic. Mr Trudeau, his wife and his mother were all at one time or another invited as speakers by WE Charity. Their links to the group led opposition parties to suggest preferential treatment. WE Charity's decision to withdraw was "mutually agreed," according to Minister of Diversity, Inclusion and Youth Bardish Chagger. "This situation unfolded in a way that is truly unfortunate," Mr Trudeau said at a press briefing Friday. He defended his involvement and that of his family with the organisation. "All my life I have been involved in supporting young people," he said. The Ethics Commissioner has already released two reports concluding that Mr Trudeau violated the Conflict of Interest Act: in 2017, for taking a vacation on the Aga Khan's private island, and last year for trying to influence legal proceedings in the SNC-Lavalin case, in which a subsidiary of the engineering company was accused of paying bribes to secure contracts in Libya.

  • Prince William's pub pint wish comes true after lockdown

    The Duke of Cambridge's wish for a pint in his local after months of lockdown was granted when he visited a pub ahead of bars and restaurants reopening. A few weeks ago William joked he was looking forward to having a drink and on Friday he was able to savour a cider when he visited the Rose and Crown in the Norfolk village of Snettisham. The duke and his family have visited the 600-year-old pub, hotel and restaurant, which is a few miles from their home of Anmer Hall, and William returned to show his support for Britain's hospitality industry on the eve of customers returning. After following health protocols and sanitising his hands with gel he asked landlords Anthony and Jeannette Goodrich: "Can I have a pint of cider please? I'm a cider man," ordering a £4.15 pint of Aspall Suffolk Draught Cyder and a plate of chips. The duke took a seat in the pub's garden with the landlords, their head chef Philip Milner and duty manager Lucy Heffer, and when his drink and food arrived he joked: "I don't know where I pay, I'll do that before I leave, I promise." Concerns have been raised about pubs and bars reopening on the weekend dubbed "Super Saturday" rather than a weekday, and the Prime Minister has already appealed to pubgoers to show restraint. William quizzed the landlords about their expectations for the weekend when they welcome customers on Saturday: "It could end up with everyone at the pub, because people just want a change of scene, being at home for so long. "Are you worried about people getting a bit out of hand this weekend? I guess it's more of a problem with the larger pub chains." Mr Goodrich, 65, admitted: "We are a bit concerned but we are ready for it." He told the duke that it was part of the business to be prepared for rowdy behaviour: "The only real worry is if we have 100 people in the garden and it rains. But we'll have to deal with that." William replied: "I am sure people will want to get out and explore locally. I don't think they'll want to go far afield." Anthony and Jeannette Goodrich have owned the pub for 25 years and had to close their premises and furlough more than 25 full-time employees, who are bolstered by another 10 or 15 temporary weekend workers, when the outbreak struck. They were able to reopen partially a couple of weeks ago and start selling takeaway drinks. "We have been doing takeaway beer, which has been going down well," Mrs Goodrich, 64, said. Saturday will see the return of their cherished locals, who will have a choice of socially distanced drinking in three bars or the pub garden, where a marquee had also been erected. Some parts of the pub will remain closed on health and safety advice, a popular children's play area set up like a galleon will have to remain closed because of the difficulty in enforcing social distancing among the children. William said his own children loved it. "The children have been in there a few times," he said, staring at the ropes preventing anyone entering. "They will see that as a challenge." He told the staff that customers would have to learn to get used to the new normal in pubs: "We all have to take responsibility for our own two-metre bubble."

  • UK hit by backlash from 'excluded' Portugal as it unveils 74 quarantine-free destinations for holidaymakers

    Britain faced a backlash last night from Portugal, one of our most popular tourist destinations, after ditching it from a list of 74 countries and territories that English holidaymakers can visit without quarantine. Canada, the USA, China and Thailand were also excluded from the “amber” and “green” lists of countries to which English holidaymakers can fly and avoid quarantine on their return to the UK from Friday July 10. Among those included on the lists were short-haul destinations such as Spain, France, Italy, Turkey, Greece, Croatia and Cyprus, as well as long-haul locations including Australia, Barbados, Hong Kong, Japan, New Zealand and Vietnam. However, Portugal, where the Algarve is rated the third most popular European holiday spot for Britons, was left off because of a recent spike in Coronavirus cases in and around Lisbon. Portugal's foreign ministry said in a tweet it was "absurd" that Britain imposed quarantine on travellers coming from Portugal despite having 28 times more deaths from the coronavirus.