• Home
  • Mail
  • News
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Search
  • Mobile
  • More
Yahoo
    • Skip to Navigation
    • Skip to Main Content
    • Skip to Related Content
    • Mail
    Lifestyle Home
    Follow Us
    • Style
    • Beauty
    • Wellness
    • Shopping
    • MAKERS
    • Holiday Guide for Guys
    • Pets
    • Video
    • Horoscopes
    • Pop Culture

    Down Syndrome Isn’t Something Terrible

    Ashley Moreno
    The MightyNovember 23, 2019
    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share
    Picture of girl and man with Down syndrome hugging
    Picture of girl and man with Down syndrome hugging

    “Something terrible has been discovered about the pregnancy.”

    My son isn’t something terrible.

    But the world often disagrees.

    You can tell me how cute my kids are all day long.

    You can love us and laugh along with our wild, beautiful chaos.

    But the truth is, the world still overwhelmingly thinks Down syndrome is “something terrible.”

    People still argue that it’s irresponsible to bring children like Mason into the world.

    Junie was born in a country where prenatal diagnosis wasn’t available, and she was abandoned and spent five-and-a-half years as an orphan.

    Down syndrome isn’t terrible.

    A world without Down syndrome — that’s terrible.

    A world where people scream “tolerance” for every group except people with disabilities — that’s terrible.

    My children make some people in the world uncomfortable.

    My children make the world face its fears, and come face to face with the reality that we are not in control. We are not God.

    Related:​ How I Explained Down Syndrome to My Daughters

    Life is messy.

    Life is imperfect.

    And that’s OK.

    It’s not terrible.

    It’s just life.

    And until you can truly preach tolerance for those who by their very genetic code are different from the rest of us, tolerance is meaningless.

    My son is a gift not because I chose to be OK with his extra chromosomes, his extra challenges, but because I believe he bears the spark of the divine, the fingerprint of the creator.

    My children are not terrible.

    They are fearfully and wonderfully made.

    Not choices, but children.

    Not guarantees, but children.

    Not terrible.

    Read more stories like this on The Mighty:

    Down With Disney Photo Series Recreates 12 Classic Disney Films

    Down Syndrome Is Normal

    To the Doctor With Low Expectations for My Son With Down Syndrome

    Why I Don't Expect American Girl to Make a Doll With Down Syndrome

    What My Son With Down Syndrome Has Taught Me

    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share

    What to Read Next

    • Two Women Landed in the ER After Using a Vacuum to End Their Periods, According to a Nurse's Scary Viral Tweet

      Meredith Videos
    • Nike unveils all-day shoes for nurses, and we want a pair—stat

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • "Milky Nails" Are the Manicure Trend You're Going to See All Throughout 2020

      Allure
    • Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds' Wedding Photos Are Now Banned from Pinterest

      Harper's Bazaar
    • Tarek El Moussa and Heather Rae Young Snap 'Family' Holiday Pic with Kids

      House Beautiful
    • Kendall Jenner's Nude Minidress Looks Like It's Dripping in Tinsel

      Harper's Bazaar
    • This Extended-stay Hotel Will Let You Foster a Dog During Your Stay — and Adopt It in the Lobby On Your Way Out

      Travel+Leisure
    • 17 Photos That Show the Surprising Physical Side of Depression

      The Mighty
    • Can You Wear Red to a Wedding? This Is the Definitive Answer

      Who What Wear
    • Amazon delivery man speaks out after video of his celebratory dance goes viral: 'I was extremely suprised'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Miss Universe is Breaking Barriers With Its First Openly Gay Contestant

      Glamour
    • Ryan Reynolds recruits 'Peloton wife' for hilarious new Aviation Gin ad

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Jennifer Lopez jokes about turning 50 and strips down to her iconic green Versace dress on 'Saturday Night Live'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Pink Gave Herself a Buzz Cut and — No Surprise — Looks Like a Total Badass

      Allure
    • This SKIMS Collection Is Everything You Need and More This Winter

      Who What Wear
    • Abandoned 5-Year-Old Carries Toddler in Extreme Cold After Adult Allegedly Left Them in Home

      People

    President Trump 'abused his power to improperly put his thumb on the scale for the election': Rep. Zoe Lofgren

    bigO: I am somewhat of a political nerd and former law enforcement, so both definitely affect my opinions. 1) The proceedings to date have been dictated by the majority (Democrats) without trying to garner any input from the minority (Republicans). In the past, the majority has always reached out to the minority, regardless if the minority agreed or not (ex: Pres Clinton's impeachment) for both the appearance of bipartisanship in the House and publicly. The proceedings to date have not even come close to mirroring precedent. 2) Speaking from a legal point of view, I do not know any prosecutor who would accept a case such as this to send to the Grand Jury. Nothing in the report from Rep Schiff has anything which would be codified in the federal legal system, nor would be recognized by common law. Again, this breaks with precedent. 3) Along with #2, all of the "damaging" testimony to date has been hearsay and supposition (opinion). Yes, there is the actual call, but no specific demands tying things together. Couple with the facts the Ukrainians did not know the aid was being withheld, nor did their President feel pressured, would seem to undercut the argument. 4) I was interested in the constitutional witnesses (again - political nerd / law enforcement), but I was struck the first witness was called by Republicans while the remaining three were called by Democrats. Traditionally, it would be 2-2 in the spirit of bipartisanship. However, I was struck by the one witness who seemed to really push back on impeachment. 5) At least to me the whole process seems to be really rushed. If the Democrats are going to truly investigate Pres Trump, then put the time and effort in to do it correctly. Looking at the history of when the House issues subpoenas (ex: Pres Clinton / AG Holder / Pres Nixon), the House traditionally takes its time to work through various issues and looks to resolve them without legal action. We have even seen that be the case fairly recently (AG Barr releasing additional information regarding the Mueller report). But, the rush to issue subpoenas, and the apparent unwillingness for the courts to work through various key witnesses (ex: Bolton / Mulvaney) seems more of a drive to have Articles of Impeachment voted upon versus getting the whole story. 6) I am also fairly troubled with the report from Rep Schiff as not only does it throw a bunch of stuff against the wall which has not been fully investigated, but it released a great deal of phone numbers / conversations to the public. This should be immediately addressed in the strongest of terms as any prosecutor who did this would not only be subjected to firing, but potential jail time as well. 7) Initially I expected the House to vote on 3-4 Articles of Impeachment. But, as Rep Nadler accepted the report from Rep Schiff on the whole, and Rep Pelosi ordered Rep Nadler to move forward with Articles, I think the number could grow exponentially. This might be an attempt to see what sticks or at least give some Reps cover so they could vote against some in districts where Pres Trump did very well. 8a) The whole scenario changes once it hits the Senate. I have seen more than a few promote the idea the Senate will call various people to the trial (Pompeo / Bolton / Mulvaney), but I doubt that will happen. Although the Chief Justice presides, it is really the majority in the Senate which dictate what will or will not take place. It has been reported Sen Schumer has rebuffed negotiations with Sen McConnel regarding the rules of a proposed trial. If that continues, then Sen McConnel, with the Republican majority, could have a simple vote on the rules regardless of what the minority want (i.e. what the House did). 8b) Unless something changes, my presumption is the trial will last 4-8 weeks with possibly 1-Republican voting for removal while potentially 2-Democrats will vote against. Of course, all of the above could change if first-hand information is revealed which directly contradicts what Pres Trump has said to date. But, as independents have been moving away from impeachment, and the process has been very one-sided, if nothing changes I expect Pres Trump to stay in office.

    Join the Conversation
    1 / 5

    1.8k

    • Where You Should Travel Solo, Based on Your Zodiac Sign

      Travel+Leisure
    • Chrissy Teigen Claps Back at a Troll Who Tells Her to “Cover Up” Around Her Daughter

      Prevention
    • NFL Network's Jane Slater Caught Her Boyfriend Cheating Due to His Fitbit

      Men's Health
    • Her Own Private Island: Why Princess Margaret Loved Mustique More Than Any Palace

      Town & Country
    • Newlyweds killed in tragic helicopter crash after their wedding

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Ryan Reynolds Trolled That Conversational Peloton Ad and the Internet Has Thoughts

      Glamour
    • Princess Charlotte Casually Asked for a Pony for Christmas This Year

      Cosmopolitan
    • Goop has been reported to U.K. officials for allegedly breaching advertising law

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Lady Gaga Just Went Pantsless in a T-Shirt, Fishnets & Barely Anything Else

      Marie Claire
    • The True Story of Queen Elizabeth's Final Visit with the Duke of Windsor

      Town & Country
    • Liam Hemsworth speaks out on Miley split

      Yahoo Lifestyle Videos
    • I Wear Leggings 4 Times a Week—These Are the Shoes I Recommend

      Who What Wear
    • Cyclist Posts Snarky Warning Signs Aimed at Runners on Popular Mixed-Use Trail

      Men's Health
    • Halle Berry rocks a wet T-shirt — and no bra — for her 53rd birthday

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Fans defend Meghan Markle from 'haters' over baby Archie's private christening plans

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Ariana Grande Just Reached Out to Her TikTok Doppelgänger

      Harper's Bazaar