These DIY Face Mask Materials Are Best, According To Scientists

Sarah Midkiff

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidelines on wearing face masks in public to recommend that everyone, sick or not, cover their faces with fabric while saving medical-grade masks for health care workers. However, not all fabrics are created equal. Scientists around the country have conducted experiments on which common, at-home fabrics are the most effective at filtering microscopic particles

While a simple face covering can block many outgoing germs, such as a cough or sneeze of someone carrying the virus, there are more specific recommendations on what homemade masks best protect wearers from incoming germs

The CDC posted a no-sew mask pattern using a bandana and a coffee filter as well as a video tutorial for using rubber bands and folded fabrics found at home. The recommendation that everyone wear masks is in part to keep germs in, but also protecting people from inhaling viral particles.

The change in recommendation came from new information related to symptoms of the coronavirus. A significant number of people with the virus are asymptomatic, showing little to no symptoms, reports the CDC. There is also an incubation period when people who have contracted the virus have not had it long enough for any symptoms to emerge. In both instances, these people are still contagious and run the risk of getting others sick. 

While these homemade face coverings offer a sense of comfort, they are by no means a complete solution. Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House coronavirus task force response coordinator, said masks should be considered an “additive” to social distancing and not a substitute. 

Wearing a mask does not mean that you and your friends can now return to picnics in the park and house parties. In a news conference last week, Birx said that people often feel “an artificial sense of protection because they are behind a mask. Don’t get a false sense of security.” Wearing a protective face covering is meant to offer additional protection for the times we absolutely have to leave the house for essential things such as food and medicine.

According to a study conducted by Dr. Scott Segal, chair of anesthesiology at Wake Forest Baptist Health in partnership with Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, the best homemade masks they tested for filtering the most particles were constructed from a heavyweight “quilters cotton” with a thread count of at least 180 because its weave is thicker and tighter, which allows for fewer particles to pass through. 

The least effective fabrics were scarves and cotton bandanas. However, bandanas, when layered with layers of a filtration system such as a few coffee filters, were significantly more effective. 

One of the most common — and surprisingly effective — materials were 600-thread count pillowcases or fabric similar to flannel pajamas when doubled up. Scientists found that, when folded into four layers, high-thread count pillowcases offered up to 60% filtration. Using HEPA furnace filters and vacuum cleaner bags were also among the best homemade alternatives. For reference, the typical surgical mask filters out 62-65% of particles while N95 masks, the ones that are recommended only be reserved for health care workers, filter out 95% of particles.

Unsure of what fabrics to use? Scientists say a simple light test can help you choose which of your options is the best mask material. “Hold it up to a bright light,” Segal told The New York Times. “If light passes really easily through the fibers and you can almost see the fibers, it’s not a good fabric. If it’s a denser weave of thicker material and light doesn’t pass through it as much, that’s the material you want to use.”

To make sure masks are the most effective they can be, regular washing is essential. According to CDC guidelines, washing masks regularly in a washing machine is sufficient for cleaning cloth masks. Segal advises avoiding bleach and harsher chemicals “until we know the effect on the fabric’s effectiveness.” 

For washing any fabrics, clothing or masks that you wear when out in public, it is important to take precautions when washing them. Using CDC flu virus guidelines, clothing and reusable masks should be washed at a temperature of at least 167 degrees. That is the minimum temperature proven to kill the flu virus. Chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, alcohol, and detergent are all effective cleaning products. 

Your best bet is to clean all clothing and cloth masks using the warmest water setting and making sure they are dried completely. Also, remember to wash your hands or wear gloves when doing the laundry and make sure your hands are clean before touching anything else.

COVID-19 has been declared a global pandemic. Go to the CDC website for the latest information on symptoms, prevention, and other resources.

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

Doctors Are Going Viral & Getting Fired

There May Already Be A Vaccine For Coronavirus

Why Am I So Desperate For A Coronavirus Boyfriend?

More From

  • Fenty’s Latest Drop Has ‘00s Going-Out Tops, Belly Chains & Anklets

    At the beginning of June, Rihanna launched the first of three Fenty drops for the LVMH-backed luxury brand’s 6-20 collection. The series, according to a press release, was designed to celebrate the “free spirit and curious nature of youth,” with each drop symbolizing a different aspect of today’s culture. Drop one focused on the younger generation’s ability to speak out on social issues, manifested through pieces like a hoodie with the word “Immigrant” printed across the front; the collection’s second drop combined sartorial trends from ‘90s rave culture with logomania of the ‘00s. On Thursday, the artist-turned-fashion-designer revealed the final piece of the puzzle.For the final drop, Rihanna focused on the sense of freedom and hope in young people. The result is an array of ‘60s-esque psychedelic and playful pieces, including a trippy co-ord designed using Japanese tie-dye techniques, a flouncy asymmetric dress à la Paris Hilton circa 2004, an ultra-sexy backless going-out top, and a pinstripe shirt-and-pencil skirt ensemble produced in an acid flower print. A selection of ‘90s-era jewelry, from belly chains to anklets, round out the collection — one that reminds us of the days when summer’s arrival meant late nights spent dancing rather than staying home. But this collection isn’t about escaping the realities of today, or, for that matter, attempting to return to the past. Instead, 6-20 brings attention to the resilience of younger generations, with a focus on their ability to find hope even in the most difficult of times. With Drop III’s arrival, Fenty’s summer collection, which embodies “the free, fun spirit, and limitless possibilities of youth,” is at last complete. Shop all three 6-20 drops now on what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Savage x Fenty Takes A Virtual VacationMegan Thee Stallion Is The Face Of Savage X FentyRihanna Reveals New Fenty Capsule Collection

  • In Trump’s America, It’s No Surprise That The Supreme Court Is Giving Us Whiplash

    On its last decision day of 2020, the Supreme Court has delivered a 7-2 decision in favor of allowing subpoenas for President Donald Trump’s tax returns and financial records to proceed, forcing Trump to relinquish his tax returns to circuit courts. This also means the highest court in the land has rejected Trump’s claims that he has “absolute” immunity in a New York state criminal investigation, making clear that he can be investigated while holding office. The court’s other big decision today was McGirt v. Oklahoma, in which the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of verifying that half the state of Oklahoma is legally Indian reservation land in terms of the criminal justice system. According to the New York Times, this vote could reshape the way criminal justice works in eastern Oklahoma by preventing state authorities from prosecuting Indigenous people.While both of these decisions came as welcome — but real — surprises to leftists, they were representative of the ways that this session of the Supreme Court has been full of shocks, a true mixed bag of progressive and conservative votes. Since early June, the Supreme Court has released a number of landmark decisions — from the future of the DACA program to ones involving contraceptive rights. In many — though definitely not all —of these cases, reliably right-wing justices have voted with the left. There are also cases of liberal justices like Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Elena Kagan voting with the conservative justices, as Ginsberg did by siding with the energy company in the case about the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, and Kagan did by supporting the decision to allow employers to opt out of birth control coverage on “moral” grounds. Now, as dozens of cases have been postponed due to coronavirus, it’s nearly impossible to gauge what the Supreme Court will decide next.In June, in an outcome that shocked many — but especially members of the LGBTQ+ community — the majority-conservative Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling staying that federal civil rights law also protects LGBTQ+ workers from discrimination. This ruling will affect approximately 1 million transgender workers and 7.1 million lesbian, gay and bisexual workers. The majority opinion written by Trump-appointed justice Neil Gorsuch, who wrote: “An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids.” In other progressive victories, the court first blocked a Louisiana abortion law that could have shut down almost all clinics in the state, with George W. Bush-appointed Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the left — despite his prior support for a similar law in Texas. Then, the Supreme Court prevented the Trump Administration from ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which serves to protect hundreds of thousands of immigrants from deportation.Some of these decisions were unexpected because of which of the conservative justices, whether Gorsuch or Roberts, crossed idealogical lines. Others were shocking because they seem so internally contradictory. How does one judicial body protect abortion rights in Louisiana one week, and destroy access to birth control on “moral grounds” the next? It’s not only progressives who have been surprised by things like the LGBTQ+ decision and DACA decision — they also took President Trump and right-wing pundits off-guard, with Trump called some of the recent decisions “horrible and politically charged,” saying that they’re “shotgun blasts into the face of people that are proud to call themselves Republicans or Conservatives.” The president also noted that conservatives are worried about losing 2nd Amendment rights and “everything else.” Trump tweeted all this soon after the Supreme Court ruled against undoing DACA.Still, even if you think the current Supreme Court is a confusing mess, just wait, because there’s a good chance things will get even more chaotic. With a second Trump term now less and less certain, conservative justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are allegedly considering announcing their retirements, which would potentially give Trump the power to appoint two new, young, ultra-conservative justices to the court. There would undoubtedly be pushback from Democrats (remember when Obama wasn’t allowed to appoint a new justice in the last year of his presidency?), but if 2020 has taught us anything, it’s this: Everything that’s strange and bad, will only get stranger and worse.Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Why This SCOTUS Birth Control Ruling Is DangerousCan Trump Still End DACA Despite SCOTUS Decision?SCOTUS Strikes Down Louisiana Abortion Law

  • 6 Top-Rated Conditioners That Are Like A Long Drink Of Water For Your Hair

    In the summer, hair exposed to the intense heat of the sun — plus the humidity, sweat, and frequent shampooing that come with it — is prone to extreme dryness. Right now, that seasonal moisture zap may be worsened by chlorine damage, at-home highlights, or the fact that your hair hasn't seen a pair of scissors in months, with the split, frizzy ends to prove it. If you can relate, you might be in need of a conditioner upgrade. According to Fabian Lliguin, NYC-based hair pro and co-founder of Rahua, a hydrating conditioner will be your best defense against summer damage. "Dry, porous hair is attracted to the moisture in the air, causing the cuticle to swell, giving you frizz and fried-looking strands," Lliguin explains. "The best and easiest way to avoid this is to keep your hair as hydrated as possible, using a sulfate-free shampoo followed by a hydrating conditioner to create a protective, moisture-sealed barrier around the hair shaft." If you're set with a gentle, non-stripping shampoo, find your followup — a best-in-class moisturizing conditioner — ahead. At Refinery29, we’re here to help you navigate this overwhelming world of stuff. All of our market picks are independently selected and curated by the editorial team. If you buy something we link to on our site, Refinery29 may earn commission.Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?A Pro's Guide To Removing Chlorine From Your HairAriel Winter Dyed Her Hair Ice BlondeThe Best Epilators For Long-Lasting Smooth Skin

  • In Vogue Cover Story, Simone Biles Speaks Candidly About Larry Nassar’s Abuse

    Simone Biles is one of the greatest athletes of our time. She’s the most decorated gymnast — male or female — ever. Several gymnastic moves have been named after her. At times, her talent even blows her own mind. Biles has also come forward as a victim of sexual abuse at the hands of Larry Nassar, a former doctor for the U.S. women’s national gymnastics team. The gymnast is currently a plaintiff in the sex abuse lawsuit against USA Gymnastics and the US Olympic and Paralympic Committee, as well.In an interview for Vogue’s August 2020 issue, Biles opened up more about coming to terms with Nassar’s abuse, and the attempts by the USAG and USOPC to cover it up. When she first learned about Larry Nassar’s abuse, “It didn’t feel like real life,” Biles told interviewer Abby Aguirre. She describes refusing to talk about the case with her family and going through periods of anxiety without understanding why. After she moved out of her parents’ house, her mental health took a turn for the worse. “I was very depressed,” Biles said. “At one point I slept so much because, for me, it was the closest thing to death without harming myself. It was an escape from all of my thoughts, from the world, from what I was dealing with. It was a really dark time.”One of the things that was so insidious about Nassar’s abuse was that he disguised it as medical treatments, so much so that some athletes’ parents were in the room when the abuse was taking place without realizing what was going on. In the Vogue interview, Biles was candid about not believing she was really a victim at first. “I felt like I wasn’t abused, because it wasn’t to the same extent as the other girls,” Biles said. She also described being afraid of letting down the public, who saw her as “perfect” and “America’s sweetheart,” by coming forward about her abuse. Ultimately, though, hearing teammates such as Maggie Nichols come forward about their own experiences with Nassar helped her come to terms with hers. “I was reading Maggie’s coverage and it just hit me,” Biles said. “I was like, I’ve had the same treatments. I remember googling, like, sexually abused.”In January 2018, Biles posted a statement on social media identifying herself as a victim of abuse. To Vogue, she described the experience as cathartic. She also said she hoped that sharing her story would help other survivors feel safer coming forward. Biles has continued to be critical of USAG and USOPC, and in the interview said, “We can’t feel comfortable promoting our sport if we fear that something might happen like this again because they’re not doing their part.” The gymnast’s discomfort with USAG made the postponement of the Olympics — to July 2021, due to the coronavirus pandemic — even more painful, since it means she has to deal with the organization for another year, Aguirre wrote. But as of now, she’s still planning on competing. For Biles, Nichols, and other survivors of Nassar’s abuse to speak out against him and the people and organizations that were complicit is awe-inspiringly brave. But it’s also wrong to expect them to be solely responsible for pushing for accountability and change. Biles’s story illustrates how damaging sexual abuse can be. Unless they do the work required to uncover why it was allowed to go on for so long and to ensure something like this never happens again, the USAG and USOPC are placing a heavy and unacceptable burden on the backs of Nassar’s victims.Early in the article, Aguirre describes attending a talk Biles was giving, during which she was asked whether she felt “obligated to stand up when something bad is going on in society.” “Personally, for me, I don’t think of it as an obligation,” Biles responded, according to Aguirre. “I think of it as an honor to speak for the less fortunate and for the voiceless. I also feel like it gives them power.”If you have experienced sexual violence and are in need of crisis support, please call the RAINN Sexual Assault Hotline at 1-800-656-HOPE (4673). If you are thinking about suicide, please call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-TALK (8255) or the Suicide Crisis Line at 1-800-784-2433. Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?This Is How Long Larry Nassar Will Stay In PrisonWomen Athletes Are On The Frontlines Of ProtestsThe Founder Amplifying Female Athletes' Stories