Corporate interests paid people off to help kill a bill. They also tried to pay high school activist Celeste to publicly oppose a bill banning fur products in California— but instead, she blew the whistle.
“They told me I could get paid to pretend to be a grassroots opponent of the fur ban, even after I told them that I don’t oppose it,” she said.
During a hearing on a California bill to ban the sale and manufacturing of fur, Edwin Lombard spoke in opposition to the bill, claiming it was racist. But his company was paid $3,500 by the Fur Information Council of America, as documents uncovered by Direction Action Everywhere later revealed. There were also posts on Facebook also promised “an easy $100” fighting tyranny, that were created by Andrew DiGiovanna, who verbally opposed the bill, which was actually a ploy to get people to pose a grassroots organization opposing the fur ban.
The Fur Council of America reported spending more than $100,000 on lobbying efforts between January and June 2019.
AB 44 would be the first statewide ban on selling and making fur.
“We have to dig a little deeper and empower ourselves with the truth,” Celeste said. “Let’s push the fur ban through the finish line.”
This video, "Corporate Fur Group Attempted to Buy Opposition to Fur Ban", first appeared on