Chelsea Clinton Being Confronted By Students Should Make Us Talk About Islamophobia

Jenna Milliner-Waddell

At a vigil in New York City Friday for the victims of the New Zealand mosque massacre, Chelsea Clinton was confronted by New York University students who characterized comments she made in opposition to Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar’s tweet last month as an incitement to the violence.

“This, right here, is a result of a massacre stoked by people like you and the words that you put out into the world,” a student said to Clinton, as seen in a video posted on Twitter. “And I want you to know that and I want you to feel that deep down inside. Forty-nine people died because of the rhetoric you put out there.”

The rhetoric the student in the video is referring to is Clinton’s response to Omar’s now-deleted tweet that critics said implied Jewish money drives the U.S.'s support for Israel, making the comment, "It's all about the Benjamins, baby."

An opinion editor at The Forward, a Jewish-American news outlet, quoted the tweet saying, “Please learn how to talk about Jews in a non-anti-Semitic way. Sincerely, American Jews.”

This is when Clinton chimed in to back the journalist up. “Co-signed as an American,” she replied. “We should expect all elected officials, regardless of party, and all public figures to not traffic in anti-Semitism.”

Omar apologized “unequivocally” and thanked her colleagues and Jewish allies for “educating me on the painful history of anti-Semitic tropes."

Clinton, who attended as the co-founder and co-chair of NYU’s Of Many Institute for Multifaith Leadership, offered an apology that did not sit well with the students in the video. “I’m so sorry that you feel that way,” Clinton said. “Certainly, it was never my intention. I do believe words matter. I believe we have to show solidarity.”

The exchange has sparked a conversation on social media about whether or not the criticism of Clinton was deserved. Many felt that Clinton’s words couldn’t have inspired the massacre, which left 49 people dead, in which a desire to protect Clinton is clashing with a need to allow POC and Muslims to express their grief and rage.

“This is absolute horseshit. Chelsea Clinton calling out Ilhan Omar’s anti-semitism is not islamophobia and blaming her for Christchurch is completely uncalled for,” one tweet read. “I’m muslim and I thought Omar crossed the line into anti-semitism. Muslims need allies. this video ain’t it, chief.”

Others took issue with the fact that Clinton’s feelings were being valued more than those who were grieving.

“Took liberals less than 24 hours to forget their empty platitudes over the NZ terrorist attack and turn on a young Muslim woman for expressing her grief and uncomfort with the fact a person who contributed to Islamophobia was at a vigil, a space for Muslims to mourn their dead,”one tweet read.

Another tweet recognized support for Clinton in this moment as another example of white comfort being prioritized over the grieving Muslim community.

“I don't understand all of the concern about Chelsea Clinton,” one user wrote. “I know how the students approached aggressively and might have even hurt or embarrassed her. but those students were hurting too. We have got to stop valuing the comfort of white people over the well-being of POC.”

Other’s pointed out how Clinton’s actions show another side of Islamophobia.

“No one thinks the Christchurch shootings were inspired by Chelsea Clinton,”one tweet read. “The point is that Islamophobia doesn’t just exist on the far-right and we all have a responsibility to fight it, whether it’s of the subtle or “invading hordes” variety.”

Clinton’s actions have opened up a discourse, unwittingly, in which minorities speaking their truth to power is the focus. As many have pointed out, it is not up to the white majority to police the timing or tone in which a Muslim girl addresses Clinton, nor is it the responsibility of that girl to tone down her grief and emotions to make the conversation more comfortable for Clinton or her defenders.

It has also created a conversation of awareness around Islamophobia. While Omar admitted her blind spots in repeating tropes about Jews, the condemnation she was met with far stripped any that her colleagues in Congress have heard for their comments lambasting Black Lives Matter, Islam, and promoting white supremacy. That is why many feel Clinton’s comments disparaging Omar contributed to marginalizing her and may have helped further institutionalize Islamophobic rhetoric.

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

Who Is Running For President In 2020?

Rosario Dawson Is Dating Cory Booker — What Does It Mean For The 2020 Race?

What Ivanka & Her Dad Have In Common: Stealing Other People's Ideas

More From

  • What AOC Means By “Tax The Rich” & Why It Makes People Scared

    The COVID-19 crisis has created a massive budget shortfall in New York state. But, amid mounting pressure to tax the wealthy in order to offset it, Gov. Andrew Cuomo continues to double down on his refusal to raise taxes for millionaires or billionaires.When asked on Monday about the prospect of taxing the state’s more than 100 billionaires, Cuomo cited concerns about so-called “tax flight” — the possibility that higher taxes could spur a mass exodus of New York’s wealthy. “I literally talk to people all day long who are in their Hamptons house who also lived [in New York City], or in their Hudson Valley house or in their Connecticut weekend house, and I say, ‘You gotta come back, when are you coming back?'” Cuomo said during a press conference on Monday. “They’re not coming back right now. And you know what else they’re thinking? If I stay there, I pay a lower income tax because they don’t pay the New York City surcharge.”Despite Cuomo’s insistence that the rich would flee New York if pressed to pay up, researchers who studied IRS data have found that tax flight is historically negligible in the state. Cuomo’s comments follow similar disavowals by the governor last Wednesday when, after being pressed for answers about a wealth tax, Cuomo claimed that, “You’d have to tax each of them a half billion dollars, and then you’d have no billionaires left.”New York state’s Democratic legislative leaders have long called on Cuomo to consider siphoning wealth from the state’s billionaires in order to redistribute it to an ailing working class. “We need to ask Gov. Cuomo to tax the people who are benefiting from this pandemic in order to support the working families who are facing housing insecurity, food insecurity, and more,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said in a promotional video released by the progressive advocacy group Make the Road New York last week.> WATCH: @AOC to @NYGovCuomo: > > “It’s time to stop protecting billionaires, and it’s time to start working for working families.” > > She joins leading voices across NY to demand that Cuomo MakeBillionairesPay and FundExcludedWorkers.> > — Make the Road NY 🦋 (@MaketheRoadNY) July 16, 2020The video also featured Public Advocate Jumaane Williams and State Sen. Jessica Ramos, among a host of other local elected officials. Ramos is the steward of a bill known as the “Billionaire Mark to Market Tax Act,” which calls for the state’s 118 billionaires to start paying income tax on their unrealized capital gains, which are currently tax exempt. Ramos’ bill also proposes the establishment of a “worker bailout fund” to be used by those who did not qualify for federal unemployment benefits to withdraw up to $3,300 per month if they have lost their jobs or otherwise suffered financially during the crisis. But Cuomo would ultimately need to sign off on it in order for it to pass into law — and so far, he’s signaled that he’s unwilling to do so.Although the governor is quick to tout the efficacy of his own response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the viral outbreak has ravaged New York’s economy, with nearly 1.5 million state residents out of work as of June 2020, according to New York State Department of Labor statistics. Regarding the mounting scrutiny over his tax policy, Cuomo recently suggested that lawmakers should be lobbying President Donald Trump and Congress to enact changes at the federal level instead — something that doesn’t seem possible while Trump is in the White House.“If they want a tax increase, don’t make New York alone do a tax increase and just have the people move to Connecticut,” Cuomo said on a call with reporters Thursday morning. “If you take people who are highly mobile and you tax them, then they’ll just move next door where the tax treatment is simpler. It has to be done on a federal level.”Ocasio-Cortez’s position is perhaps made clearest by a 2019 tweet that recently reemerged as the debate around taxing the wealthy reaches a fever pitch.> When we say “tax the rich,” we mean nesting-doll yacht rich. For-profit prison rich. Betsy DeVos, student-loan-shark rich. > > Trick-the-country-into-war rich. Subsidizing-workforce-w-food-stamps rich. > > Because THAT kind of rich is simply not good for society, & it’s like 10 people.> > — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) May 11, 2019“When we say ‘tax the rich,’ we mean nesting-doll yacht rich. For-profit prison rich. Betsy DeVos, student-loan-shark rich. Trick-the-country-into-war rich. Subsidizing-workforce-[with]-food-stamps rich,” she wrote. “Because THAT kind of rich is simply not good for society, & it’s like 10 people.”As the pandemic rages on with no sign of abetting any time soon — and as other states continue to move forward with their own plans to raise taxes on millionaires and billionaires — Cuomo’s insistence on kowtowing to his monied surrogates speaks volumes. Meanwhile, he chooses symbolic gestures and vanity art projects over helping New York’s working class survive this pandemic with dignity. Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Chris Cuomo Unleashes On Trump's Goya PhotoWait, What Is The Boyfriend Cliff?How AOC & The Squad Plan To Cancel Rent Payments

  • These Psychics Do Virtual Readings — But Should You Get One?

    The first time I was given a psychic reading, I was 12 years old and on vacation with my family in Seaside Heights (yes, where the hit reality show Jersey Shore was filmed). I was desperately searching for confirmation that my middle school crush loved me back, so I took the $10 my parents gave me for a henna tattoo straight to one of the psychics sitting in the small stalls along the boardwalk. I received plenty of information on that visit, including that the letter “T” was romantically significant to my life — a huge letdown to my preteen self, since my crush’s name started with an N.Sure, that Jersey Shore psychic experience was a little disappointing. But it didn’t put me off the practice forever, especially not once I discovered that there are plenty of psychics who I could visit without having to make a trip to a seedy boardwalk. In fact, many offer their services virtually — a blessing, especially during COVID-19 times.“Spiritual energy is not confined to time and space, so sessions can occur in person or online,” Live the Light, psychic empath and advisor at, tells Refinery29. “That deep connection can be felt across cities, states, even countries. There are no limits when spirit is involved.”You can book your own psychic for a phone call or online chat to get answers to your most pressing questions. But there are many different types out there, so it’s worth doing your research to figure out exactly what you want out of your reading.“It’s important to read their online profiles and determine if  they specialize in the area you want to focus on,” Live the Light explains. “For example, if you’re interested in relationships, connect with a love psychic. If you want to tap into spirit, consider a psychic medium.” Once you’ve found a psychic who meets your criteria, have questions prepared. But flexibility is key too, Live the Light says. “They may touch on things that you never considered asking about. However, that may produce some surprising and enlightening results,” she explains.“Types of readings vary per advisor,” Love Expert Sara, a psychic for who has given over 95,000 readings, tells Refinery29. “Most, but not all, are using tarot cards or some sort of divination tool. Others use no tools at all and use a combination of clairvoyance, remote viewing, clairaudience, and claircognizance.”To define those terms: Clairvoyance is the ability to perceive psychic abilities using imagery; clairaudience is the ability to perceive by hearing; and claircognizance is the ability to perceive by knowing. Remote viewing, according to Gaia, is “the ability to acquire accurate information about a distant or non-local place, person or event without using your physical senses.”There are reasons not to go see a psychic, of course. Reputable psychics will usually refuse to give legal advice, stock predictions, and medical advice. (If they don’t, be wary — they should.) Some also stay away from predicting grim health issues, like death or sickness. “Even though most psychics are equipped in many ways to help clients in severe distress, sometimes a therapist or doctor is needed,” Love Expert Sara explains.But that doesn’t mean you should expect all positive news, either. “One of the major misconceptions is that readings are supposed to make people feel better or give them something to look forward to,” Live the Light says. “While that can happen, it’s not always the case. The actual purpose of a reading is to empower people by revealing the truth in their life.” If you’re not ready to hear something negative or unexpected, you may want to postpone your reading or not get one at all.Psychics will usually charge by the minute, and there are plenty available for all kinds of budgets. Here, we’ve rounded up a list of some pretty cool psychics who offer remote readings. Live the LightAccording to Live the Light’s profile, she specializes in destiny and life path, money and prosperity, love and relationships, and spirit guide readings. “I begin each reading by greeting the client, introducing myself, and asking their name and question,” she tells Refinery29. “I take a moment to tune into their energy and then share the impressions I am receiving. If time permits I will also delve into areas of life they may not have asked about but feel pertinent to their relationships, career, and spiritual growth.”Live the Light can be booked for a phone call through Your first three minutes are free, then each minute is $4.49. Love Expert Sara“Sara provides high-level, laser speed, extraordinarily accurate psychic readings and is one of Keen’s top rated psychic for over 10 years,” Love Expert Sara’s profile says. One of Sara’s specialties is in relationships, so for those of you seeking love insight, she’s the person to turn to. If you book a reading with Sara, she asks that you come ready with clear, specific questions.One recent reviewer wrote, “She answered all my questions and concerns to the T. She gave me advice to advance and insight on my concerns. Definitely will be back.”Love Expert Sara can be booked through for phone calls at $18.88 a minute. Jeremiah from California PsychicsAccording to his psychic profile on, Jeremiah will give you a quick, general reading, then will check in to see if and when you have any questions. This might be a good option for someone who may want some insight, but doesn’t have any specific questions. He’ll point you in a general direction, and you can go from there.A recent testimonial says, “Jeremiah is extremely on point with what he says and feels. He may tell you things you don’t want to hear or is tough to hear, but he wants what’s best for you. And he’s always accurate about what he sees.”Jeremiah can be booked through for phone calls at $10 a minute. Mysticalcraft ArrianaMysticalcraft Arriana has given 126,496 readings — and counting. She specializes in love, relationships, money, career, and even pets. “I tell it as it is,” her profile reads. “I care, which is why I give truthful responses to life’s often difficult questions.” The reviewers agree. One recently wrote, “Arriana has been right time after time! impressive. Great, great lady.” Another says, “I genuinely really enjoyed my reading with Arriana. It’s been a long time since I felt so comfortable and understood in a reading. Thank you.”Mysticalcraft Arriana can be booked through Your first three minutes are free, then each minute is $5.95. Tarot by MaisyIf you’re interested in having a reader who uses divination tools, you can turn to Tarot by Maisy — although her bookings tend to sell out fast, and for good reason. A recent reviewer wrote, “Maisy did an excellent reading for me. This was the second reading I’ve had her do within the last few months and both readings were thorough and extremely accurate. I will continue to have her do my readings in lieu of having an exceptional reader in my area.”Tarot by Maisy can be booked through Etsy. Prices may vary per booking.Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Best Unsolved Mysteries Episodes Of All TimeI Used Tarot & Astrology To Catch My Ex CheatingThe Best Crystals To Use During A Full Moon

  • Megan Thee Stallion, A True Queen, Did Her Own Makeup For “Wap” Single Art

    We thought we’d gotten enough of our fix of Black-beauty excellence after watching Black Is King this weekend, but Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion had other plans: Last night, the two revealed they would be releasing a highly anticipated single called “Wap” on Friday. While we’re disappointing we won’t be at a party chanting and dancing to the unreleased bop anytime soon, we can tell we’re in for a treat based on the gorgeous single artwork. For the cover, Cardi B and Megan pose back to back in nearly identical glam and accessories, from “WAP” doorknocker earrings to curled beehive updos by Kellon Deryck and Tokyo Stylez. Their makeup made us see double, with both women rocking bold cut-crease eyes and glossy lips. Erika La’ Pearl, Cardi B’s key makeup artist, was responsible for the Bronx-born rapper’s look. As for Megan? Deryck, her go-to hairstylist, credited the rapper herself alongside La’ Pearl for makeup in his Instagram post. > View this post on Instagram> > A post shared by Kellon Deryck (@kellonderyck) on Aug 3, 2020 at 5:06pm PDT“Meg really be slaying her own face though!!” a fan wrote of Megan’s burgundy-and-gold cut-crease and ’90s-inspired dark lip liner. “Did you do your own makeup on that WAP flyer? If so, you beat sis! Your makeup is slayed,” said another. This isn’t the first time the “Savage” rapper has done her own makeup for shoots or appearances: A few months ago, Megan shared a selfie on Instagram with the caption, “makeup by me.” Last week, following an emotional live stream where she addressed recently being shot, Megan posted a selfie rocking shimmery shadow and a full face, which Deryck confirmed was a DIY look, too. “Sis a whole glam team on her own!” he wrote. “Did her own makeup and styled her hair.” The star also did her own glam for her Guardian magazine cover in May — so, yeah, “makeup artist” should be added to her resume stat.> View this post on Instagram> > A post shared by Kellon Deryck (@kellonderyck) on Jul 27, 2020 at 7:32pm PDTLike the rest of her eager fans, we’ll be patiently awaiting the day Megan drops a tutorial — or better yet, a makeup collection or collab of her own. It’s only a matter of time before beauty brands come knocking on her door…Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

  • Inside The Portland Protests, Separating Fact From Fiction

    The anti-racism protests in Portland, OR have now surpassed the two-month mark, but rather than have a single narrative arc, multiple storylines have emerged from these specific protests, together creating a cacophony of sound quickly approaching a deafening decibel, making it hard, at times, to decipher what’s really going on. Over the last several weeks, the talk surrounding the Portland protests has focused on anarchists, law enforcement, a Wall of Moms, local government, President Donald Trump, federal agents, unmarked vans, and, most recently, the potential deployment of the National Guard. It’s no wonder that keeping track of the key players becomes difficult. Still, it’s important to resist efforts to oversimplify what is going on in Portland as merely a case of Federal Government vs. Protesters, since that binary, headline-friendly approach leaves a lot of important questions unanswered. So, what exactly is going on? Because there are so many narrative threads knotted together — in desperate need of teasing out — it’s almost easier to say what’s not going on. For example, the stories about Portland that are making the national, or even international news, are not all that is happening in the Northwest city. Nor is the real story what President Donald Trump would have the world believe, that Portland is a city under duress, one fire away from being burned to the ground. But, it is important to note that, while overwhelmingly peaceful, not all of the thousands of protesters in Portland are there to promote equity and reform. For all the well-intentioned demonstrators fighting for an end to systemic racism and police violence, there are also some who are there to invite chaos, which, in turn, drowns out the reasons why so many others have taken to the streets. And then there’s everything going on in the background, with local legislators and groups pushing for meaningful changes to be made through reallocated funding, community-based policing, and addressing inequalities plaguing the city. The good news is that the early demands of protesters are being acknowledged. The bad news is: This doesn’t make it into wider reporting. Even in local news, it is seldom stated.To understand what is happening, we must accept that there is no simple explanation and only some simple truths within the larger, complex reality. We must also ask ourselves: Can a protest ever be anything other than imperfect? Is Portland really burning?Following the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, protests broke out in cities across the country. Portland, OR was among the places drawing in thousands of protesters who came to stand up against systemic racism, police brutality, and demand that things change.National and international news publications released dramatic photos that looked as though they could have been taken straight from the set of a post-apocalyptic film: A Fox News headline describing recent events stated, “Portland protesters flood police precinct, chant about burning it down.” The New York Post said that Portland protests “have no goal except violence and anarchy.” But, as local press noted at the time, this was not what things actually looked like on the ground.In mid-July, The Oregonian published a counter to this narrative, running a photographic tour of the city to contrast the more sinister images circulating online. It showed that, by day, Portland is still largely calm; families walk the streets and peaceful protests have carried on without incident. But, by night, a different picture emerges. Tensions flare, almost like clockwork, between law enforcement and a small number of demonstrators. The problem is that, compared to the thousands of people gathering in a dozen or more locations around the city to protest, the focus on a violent few are taking away from the larger message. It also presents a skewed image of the city for those without a knowledge of Portland’s layout. “Well, first, like any group, protesters aren’t a monolith,” Portland City Commissioner Jo Anna Hardesty told Refinery29. “I have seen with my own eyes the thousands of non-violent protesters demanding fundamental change to our system. I believe that there has been a hyper-focus on things like graffiti to distract us from the real violence taking place carried out by our police and the federal agents.”Without being familiar with the city, it is easy to see images of chaos and envision an entire city under siege and overcome by violence. In reality, the images populating the news, and social media feeds come almost exclusively from a 12-block area surrounding the city’s Justice Center and the Mark O. Hatfield federal courthouse. Without that context, images and videos of violence can be twisted and contorted into whatever message serves the messenger. For Trump, the images act as justification to send federal agents into other Democrat-led cities around the country.Even after Oregon Governor Kate Brown negotiated an agreement with Vice President Mike Pence and other senior administration officials to begin withdrawing federal agents from Portland, Trump continues to use fear-filled words to stoke divisiveness. The same day the withdrawal was announced, Trump tweeted that the “sick and deranged anarchists & agitators” would leave Portland “burned and beaten to the ground.” Refinery29 reached out to Governor Kate Brown for comment. What Trump is saying about PortlandOver the Fourth of July weekend, federal agents arrived in Portland at Trump’s behest, and headlines about agents in unmarked vans grabbing protesters off the streets began to spread like wildfire. Local officials demanded Trump withdraw the influx of officers from the Northwest city to no avail. Why did Trump even send them in the first place, though? Some believe he was motivated by a desire to provoke a confrontation, push the appearance of chaos, and give himself an electorally beneficial edge in the 2020 race as the self-proclaimed “law and order president.” But has this gamble paid off?Since Trump ordered agents to Portland in late-June, his re-election campaign has capitalized on the subsequent footage and innumerable headlines and spent millions of dollars to produce ominous television ads to stoke the prospective voters’ fear. With chaotic, Democrat-led cities as the backdrop, Trump’s campaign ads attempt to associate the confrontation and chaos with rival candidate Joe Biden, reports the New York Times. One ad simulates a home invasion; an older woman waits on hold as she calls 911 while shadowy intruders appear in the background. The subtext not so subtly suggests that, should Biden get elected, lawless anarchy would prevail. It fails to address the fact that all of this alleged lawless anarchy is already happening, under Trump. What the Portland protests are really likeIn the first weeks of demonstrations, protests were largely peaceful, but local police still exhibited shows of force, including releasing tear gas into crowds, violent arrests, and harming journalists and bystanders. The ACLU filed a lawsuit against local law enforcement for using tear gas and aggressive tactics in an attempt to disperse protesters. This lawsuit would later be amended to include federal agents. Refinery29 contacted the Portland Police Bureau, but they declined to comment.“[The protests] are very similar in that there are a lot of people lining up in protest for Black lives eventually being attacked and brutalized by the police. Before Donald Trump’s federal officers were here, it was Portland’s police, and now it’s federal officers,” Greg McKelvey, founder of Portland’s Resistance and a vice-chair of the Oregon Democratic Party’s Black Caucus told Refinery29. McKelvey has been participating in and witnessing the protests firsthand. He describes the Portland protests as starting with thousands of protesters, briefly dwindling into the hundreds, but recently resurging into the thousands after Trump sent in federal enforcers. “It’s incredibly peaceful. You go in and you hear chants intermittently and people holding signs,” McKelvey said, describing the protests. “Oftentimes, especially recently, you don’t see any law enforcement for long periods of time. Every so often you hear a firework. But once you start hearing a firework every few minutes is when you can expect troops to come out of the building,” he continued, referencing the Justice Center and Federal Courthouse. “Once that happens, there’s clouds of gas, lots of flashbangs and grenades, they’re shooting something at us, I’m not sure what it is. It’s utter chaos for some amount of minutes, and then people regroup. That cycles throughout the night.” Are Portland police tear-gassing people?On June 30, Oregon Governor Kate Brown signed a bill into law that bans tear gas, except in situations where police declare a riot and broadcast a warning that tear gas is imminent before deploying it — a pretty big loophole. Just hours later, protesters were tear-gassed by the Portland Police Bureau, and three journalists were arrested.The Black-led and community-driven organization, Don’t Shoot PDX, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the city of Portland, reports Willamette Week. “The ink was barely dry on the order before the City violated it,” the filing reads. “There does not appear to be any effort to avoid exposing entire crowds of people to pepper spray; indeed, officers appear at times to be acting in open defiance of that prohibition.” So when mere weeks later, Mayor Ted Wheeler was among those tear-gassed by federal agents, many protesters did not express sympathy or concern. “How does it taste?” one protester shouted at Wheeler, reports the Washington Post. “How can you let your people get gassed out here every night?” Portland residents called out what they believed to be a double standard. How could Wheeler permit local law enforcement to tear gas protesters one week, then turn around to join the protesters and call the same act at the hands of federal officers “abhorrent?” Refinery29 reached out to Wheeler’s office for comment, who made it abundantly clear that his administration’s stance is that the presence of federal police in the city is unwelcome. “By deploying federal officers in our city, Trump has used Portland as a staging ground to further his political agenda, igniting his base to cause further divisiveness, and in doing so, endangering the lives and safety of Portlanders. By deploying federal officers, the President has made our current situation much worse. His heavy-handed tactics led to a serious injury and inflamed an already tense situation,” reads the statement provided by Wheeler’s office. “The videos, the pictures, the experiences that we are all witnessing here in Portland should be shocking to all Americans. President Trump and the Department of Homeland Security’s words and actions have shown that this is an attack on our democracy.” But, when asked a follow-up question about his actions being perceived as hypocritical by protesters, Wheeler’s office did not respond. Progress is being made in Portland, but it’s behind the scenesCommunity demands have included cutting police funding by 50%, addressing income inequality, and getting federal agents to leave the city, but making these things into a reality is complicated — not least because some are short- and others are long-term goals. But also, while protesters have centralized issues they are fighting to change, they do not have a centralized organization. “For many national audiences, I think it is hard for them to understand. There isn’t one leader or one group. There isn’t anybody who could speak for the protesters,” said McKelvey. “There’s been attempts at that, especially from local officials, to find somebody who brought a megaphone to the protest and then say, ‘Look, the leaders say it’s all over.’” But, considering the fact that there is no singular governmental voice, with clashing stances taken by city, state, and federal officials, the lack of a singular voice for the protestors should not be an excuse for government officials to avoid listening to complaints and making what changes they can.And, in fact, they have made some changes already. On June 17 — after over a month of protests, but before Trump sent a single federal agent — the Portland City Council passed its 2020-21 budget with a plan to cut at least $15 million from the police bureau, with the goal of reallocating the funds to invest in a community-led review of police patrolling services, implementing a permanent community oversight body, and supporting groups like the Oregon Legislative People of Color Caucus. This move appeared to be at least a partial response to a press release published on June 2, in which the Oregon Legislative People of Color Caucus announced that they were asking the Oregon Legislature to take at least three specific actions to improve police accountability by the end of 2020. “The issue is simply two words: Accountability and Trust,” said Oregon Sen. Lew Frederick. “Both are broken. It will take a major effort to establish them in our society. The myth that the system was sound has been overturned. Now the work begins.” Prior to the protests, the proposed budget included a $3 million increase. A week later, lawmakers in the Oregon capitol of Salem passed six police reform bills addressing force and accountability, reports local news outlet KGW. The city also banned the use of chokeholds, removed police officers from schools, and announced it will be moving away from police-based solutions and using unarmed first responders when possible.This is concrete, meaningful change, but it’s not being reflected in the reports of “anarchy in Oregon.” Instead, the Trump administration and some news outlets focus more on incendiary soundbites of protesters reportedly trying to burn down federal buildings. “It’s hard because you see things like, ‘Protesters set fire to the building.’ I don’t think that is ever an accurate representation of the protests,” said McKelvey, adding that there is usually a fence around the buildings. “Fires that are started are not usually anything close to something that could ignite the building. It’s so rare in crowds of thousands of people that, maybe every few days, one or two people set some sort of fire. But for it to be portrayed as ‘The protest is trying to burn down a building’ is incredibly inaccurate.” How Portland sees itselfBut enough about how the outside world sees Portland; what about what the city sees when it looks at its own reflection? What is going on in Portland is not only about a president vilifying protestors in order to bolster his reelection campaign. It is about more than police brutality going unchecked. It is essentially about a city trying desperately to overcome its racist history to prove that it has earned the liberal status it proudly displays to the world. By engaging in protests, the city is demonstrating what it means to fight for a cause rather than silence it. Yet, in their fervor, it’s possible that some protesters have marched into dangerous territory, and might have lost the thread of the original message.Dr. Shirley Jackson, a professor who focuses on race and social movements in the Department of Black Studies at Portland State University, cites a few examples of events during the Portland protests that have both helped and hindered the cause. Jackson said that, on June 2, when thousands of protestors laid down on Portland’s Burnside Bridge for eight minutes and 46 seconds, the length of time George Floyd was held in a chokehold by law enforcement, this was one of the most effective actions taken in the protests. “When the focus was on the police and demands were being made on the changes that the police department needed to make, that was clear. That was something that other cities could also rally around. They understood that because they were also experiencing the same thing,” Jackson told Refinery29. But, she added: “What we start to see now is some confusion around the meaning of current protest. This movement is now endangering the Black Lives Matter movement. It’s putting in the shadows the work of many of the African Americans who were really pushing that message forward. It is a movement that is no longer clear with respect to its message.”Jackson cited a number of issues at play that all contribute to the original message of the protests being lost. She mentioned a lack of clear direction after the focus shifted to the Federal Courthouse, a fear of questioning driven by an aversion to appearing “less liberal,” and creating a spectacle without considering its larger context.“Portland is a city that loves the progressive and liberal labels that have been attached to it,” said Jackson. “At the same time that makes it very difficult for people to have a difference of opinion about the nature of protest when it starts to go in a different direction. Even if you had people who were saying, ‘Wait a minute, this is not the direction of the movement,’ there may be people who feel silenced that they can’t say anything or else they will be perceived as anti-Black Lives Matter, pro-federal government, or pro-police.”There’s also the issue of media narratives now centering around grand gestures performed by white protesters. A woman posing nude in front of law enforcement was quickly dubbed “The Naked Athena,” but while some looked on in confusion, others questioned the purpose of her actions. Another example is The Wall of Moms that made a splash on social media for locking arms in protest. “No one seems to pay attention when Black mothers were marching in protest, especially those associated with Black Lives Matter. But now you have a group of white women and everybody is looking at this group as though Black women weren’t doing this sort of thing,” Jackson noted. “To see your movement taken over by people who aren’t understanding that by putting white faces at the forefront, it makes it easy for people to forget Black faces that we try to remember when we have Black Lives Matter protests.”Then there is the focus on the Federal Courthouse. “I’m not quite sure what the end game is in the siege of this particular location. That’s the thing that needs to be made clear in order to move forward,” said Jackson, adding that the longer there is a focus on the Federal Courthouse, the higher the chances are that things will escalate to further violence. “No one wants to back down. It’s a lose-lose situation. Chances are, the Feds will escalate or the crowds that are engaging in the more violent measures will also escalate. That is such a strong possibility.” But, What Protest Has Ever Been Perfect?“I think that we need to move away from a framing in which protests are something to be solved. Instead, look at protests as a tool to be used by our society and by our leaders and elected officials to move our community forward,” said McKelvey. “I don’t think protests are an obstacle that we should even be looking forward to the end of. If protests are sustained for a long period of time, I think that puts us in a better position to put pressure on our local officials as well as for our elected officials to have the capital that they need to move things forward.”The sign of a successful protest isn’t that it’s seen as perfect — or even as good — from beginning to end. Protests begin and end and there’s a lot that’s uncomfortable in the middle. The point is that a successful protest brings about change. But, it’s still important for a protest to be self-sustaining, and to progress in a way that indicates the potential for a better future — one that always has room for more change, and more protest. Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Federal Agents Are Finally Leaving PortlandNYPD Forced A Protestor Into An Unmarked VanPortland Protestors Abducted In Unmarked Vans