Acne Files: A Skin-Care Entrepreneur, Derm & Beauty Influencer Get Honest About Their Breakouts

Deanna Pai

Finding a skin-care routine that helps clear acne can leave anyone feeling helpless — especially when stubborn breakouts just keep coming back. And if you’re still dealing with it long after high school, you’re not alone. The rate of adult acne is rising and treating flare-ups can be pricey at best and painful at worst.

And yet, for a skin-care concern so common (it affects 50 million Americans annually), there’s still a stigma attached to it — for many, it continues to be a source of shame and embarrassment. To fight that mindset, we asked three people with acne-prone skin to share their unique stories, from dealing with judgment to searching for their most effective routine. Ahead, read the honest accounts of the founder of Peace Out Skincare (whose own personal experience inspires his products), a dermatologist with a genetic history of acne and scarring, and a beauty influencer who has learned to accept her skin as it is.

Nazhaya Barcelona, Beauty Influencer

During her sophomore year of college, Nazhaya Barcelona, now a beauty influencer with an Instagram account dedicated to embracing acne, started experiencing breakouts unlike anything she had ever seen.

“I’ve always had flare-ups in my life — I’ve never had acne acne, but I had little pimples here and there — but I noticed that my face was doing something it never did,” she says. “When people get acne they think you just need to use the right skin-care products and it’ll go away, but I learned, since it’s been three years now, that that’s not the case.”

Barcelona did find some success with tretinoin, a prescription-strength retinoid that kickstarts cellular turnover. “It removes layers of my skin from the surface, because I have a lot of pigmentation and hardened layers of dead skin that I feel like my acne is under,” she says. “I was using that continuously because I was really excited [about the results], and my skin was doing well.” 

After finally getting to a place where her skin was clear, she stopped using it — and then, like clockwork, her acne came back. This time, she began to look at her health and diet. She reduced her dairy intake, cut out certain foods, upped her hydration, and even sought out different types of birth control — but nothing helped.

Then, during her junior year of college, she decided to shift her mindset about her acne-prone skin. “Nothing’s working, so I have to accept it,” she says. “I just have to love it and live with it.” 

Since that turning point, she’s become vocal within the skin-positivity movement, using The Acne Aesthetic to share and celebrate her unfiltered acne journey. “I value the impact I’m having on young women, who see me living confidently with imperfect skin,” she says. “The more urgently I try to clear my skin, the less influence I have on girls who are dealing with insecurities and imperfections.”

Reaching this point of peace with her acne has allowed her a sense of gratitude that extends beyond just her skin, as well. “When you’re desperate to get rid of it, it becomes obsessive and you don’t learn to love yourself — you’re too busy trying to fix yourself,” she explains. “ [This new perspective] allows me to be happy with myself right now.” 

Enrico Frezza, Founder of Peace Out Skincare

When Enrico Frezza first began experiencing breakouts in his early teens, it did a number on his self-esteem. “It got so bad that a couple people called me ‘pizza face’,” he says. “You rely on your peers’ acceptance, so being called names and seeing my skin just breaking out all over…I didn’t want anybody to see me.” 

Frezza would stay home if he was dealing with a particularly bad breakout, and only felt comfortable around his family. “They were like, ‘It’s fine, you’re in your teens, it’ll clear up’,” he recounts. 

Eventually, he started using prescription acne medication which, for a while, did the trick. But then the acne returned.

After that, Frezza went on the hunt for something new. A second round of medication wasn’t an option — even though it cleared up his acne, he says the side effects were rough. He endured nosebleeds and cracked lips, and would wake up feeling like his dry, irritated skin was on fire. So he tried everything else — red light, blue light, chemical peels, expensive creams and spot treatments, the works — in hopes that it would improve his acne.

Even though Frezza’s breakouts got relatively better with age, they still weighed on his mental health. “Even two or three pimples made me insecure,” he says. “I would do anything to get rid of the bumps.”

Ultimately, he was looking for a holy grail: something that could shrink a pimple fast. While in a drugstore one day, searching for just that, he wandered over to the wound-healing section. “I found hydrocolloid dressing, which is used for wound care, and the package said it absorbs fluids, reduces bumpiness, and speeds wound-healing with special material,” he says. He decided to try it on top of a salicylic acid peel — and it worked. He found that it was the fastest way to treat a breakout, and at 25, Frezza started Peace Out Skincare and launched the brand’s very first product, salicylic acid-infused acne dots.

These days, Frezza says his relationship with his skin is a “rollercoaster.” But there’s a silver lining: Every new concern, be it a blackhead or a dark spot, serves as inspiration. “All of our products are connected to something I struggled with, or something that bothered me,” he says. “That’s what helps develop all of our products.” 

Not surprisingly, his new product, Peace Out Acne Serum (which just launched at Sephora today), is also rooted in his own experience: a lightweight treatment serum that targets acne and prevents future breakouts with 2% salicylic acid (and a mix of powerful active ingredients) that, for once, doesn’t dry skin out.

Salicylic Acid Acne Treatment Serum

Dr. Liza Moore, Dermatologist

While stress and diet are often linked to acne, genetics are a lesser-known factor. For Liza Moore, MD, a board-certified dermatologist in McLean, VA, her mother’s history of acne and subsequent scarring guided her to seek treatment early. “She was very active about taking me to the dermatologist early,” says Dr. Moore. “I ended up, just like most people, trying topicals and antibiotics which kind of helped, but [my skin still] wasn’t very clear.” 

She did a course of acne medication derived from vitamin A when she was 13, which helped — but as is common with young people, fluctuating hormones eventually brought the acne back. After that, Dr. Moore did a second round when she was 17, which did the trick. Now, she only gets the occasional pimple.

Still, having acne was a challenge in her teens. “I was quieter and more socially awkward, because my acne was the first thing that people saw,” she says. “For me, the worst thing is the stigma that comes with acne for a lot of people, which is people think you’re dirty — like you’re not washing your face.” 

Various people, including her mom’s friends, would suggest she use certain face washes — when really, that wasn’t the issue. “In reality, I was probably over-washing because I had acne,” she says. If anything, it did more harm than good.

After spending years in and out of dermatology offices, it’s not exactly surprising that Dr. Moore would eventually become a dermatologist herself. It puts her in a position where she can advocate on behalf of her patients, so she can offer others similarly clear skin. “I could identify with acne patients because I’ve been there,” she says.  “I saw three dermatologists before someone would give me [prescription medication] — now, I work hard at making sure people see results.”

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

More From

  • Of Course Kellyanne Conway Thinks Censoring Trump On Social Media Is “Election Interference”

    Anything can happen during a combination pandemic and election year — even social media sites finally refusing to give a platform to Donald Trump’s lies. After years of dangerous posts, Facebook and Twitter have removed one of Donald Trump’s videos for alleging that children are “almost immune” to the deadly coronavirus. Though the platform has clear guidelines about posting false, harmful information, Kellyanne Conway has another theory about why social media sites are decidedly censoring Trump. In a Fox News segment, Conway came to the president’s defense to say that removing any of his posts is inherently anti-Trump. “Why do we have the Big Tech overlords telling us what is and is not legitimate on health matters?” she asked, adding, “Twitter, Facebook, many of the forums are already overly anti-Trump. I think what’s happened is that the president has over 200 million followers on all of his social media platforms, he has used it in a way no other politician has used it, and they don’t like that.”Conway, Trump’s senior advisor and Top Fearmonger, also stated that she believes this is an election issue, and that tech companies are attempting to interfere with the president’s reelection bid. “I think what many of these tech companies are doing now to the president, to conservatives, the shadow banning, the censoring, the selective engagement, is election interference,” she said.But the actual engagement from conservatives and Trump supporters on these apps tell a completely different story. Hashtags like Trump2020 are alive and well on social media platforms — including on Instagram, owned by Facebook, where it’s recently been discovered that a bug in the system has actually been favoring pro-Trump content over Biden content. Trump2020 currently has over 2.5 million posts on Instagram, and MAGA has over 5.6 million. On TikTok, Trump2020 has over 7.5 billion views, and on Twitter, as early as yesterday, the Second Amendment was trending furiously after Letitia James announced that she would be filing a lawsuit to put an end to the National Rifle Association (NRA). But this is not the first time that Conway has accused a platform of tampering with an election. In 2018, Conway accused CNN of election interference for reporting on sexual misconduct cases against Trump. While Conway claims doing anything that contradicts the president is a plot against democracy, it also stands to mention that Facebook has consistently been pointed to as one of the main reasons that Trump even won the presidency in 2016. If this is the so-called moral high ground that Conway and the Trump team want to stand on, they may just want to hop in a time machine to stand up against social media election interference that made it possible for him to win in the first place — unless, of course, interference only matters when it isn’t to their advantage. Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Trump Gives TikTok 45 Days To Sell To U.S. CompanyTrump: Joe Biden Will "Hurt God" If ElectedIs Trump's Administration Violating The Hatch Act?

  • Will The $600 Extra Unemployment Be Extended?

    This story was originally published on July 31st, 2020.The $600 in supplemental unemployment benefits officially expired last week, before an extension was guaranteed in Congress. Most people saw their last federal unemployment payments come through on July 25th or 26th because of the way weekly unemployment schedules work, leaving millions of Americans anxious about their immediate future. Today, a Bureau of Labor Statistics report showed that while 1.8 million jobs were added in July, bringing the official unemployment rate to 10.2%, the unemployment rate for Black Americans remained almost the same. The overall rate of job gains has slowed compared to previous months. In Congress, lawmakers have been debating whether to renew the unemployment boost — but where do we stand now? What happens now that the provision has officially expired? Are there currently plans to extend it? Senate Republicans unveiled their proposal, the HEALS Act, on July 27th — and it doesn’t extend the $600. It offers a much more austere across-the-board $200/week through September. Then, starting October, it would leave it up to states to supplement their usual unemployment benefits with extra federal unemployment to total 70% of someone’s lost wages. But the amount of federal unemployment each person is eligible for is capped at $500, so in practice not everyone may get 70% of their wages replaced. Many states have had enormous logistical problems processing hordes of initial unemployment claims and sending them out in a timely manner. People in some states are still waiting for unemployment payments to start after applying months ago; there have been widespread reports of 8-hour-long lines in front of unemployment offices. Not only are Democrats opposed to this slash in unemployment from an economic and moral perspective, but The Hill reports that some states are saying it doesn’t even sound feasible.As of Friday, August 7th, there hasn’t been a clear sign of which version of federal unemployment boost will be included in the next stimulus — but there has been some movement. Republicans have generally opposed extending the $600/week payment, but on Wednesday Sens. Mitt Romney (R-UT), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Martha McSally (R-AZ) revealed that they would support $400/week for the month of September, and then from October to December replacing 80% of lost wages. Even Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell had a change of tune, saying he would support repeating the $600 boost — if President Trump supported it. Trump has stated that he’s open to continuing a federal unemployment boost, but he hasn’t explicitly supported a renewal of the $600 amount. How are negotiations going in Congress?Not well. According to The Hill, lawmakers aren’t close to a deal. In a meeting last Thursday, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin apparently did suggest an extension of the $600 — for a week. This pointless gesture was dismissed by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, who was also in the meeting, countered with a four-month extension. Pelosi and Schumer rejoined with an extension through Q1 of 2021. This was rejected by Mnuchin and Meadows. Both Meadows and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took to Twitter to slam the Democrats standing firm on a longer unemployment extension. McCarthy wrote, “Republicans just tried to extend unemployment insurance for the millions of Americans who are out of work and counting on extra support each week. Chuck and Nancy said no. And now Democrats are going home for the weekend… while they continue to collect a paycheck.” It’s a puzzling criticism, considering that Senate Republicans left for the weekend on Thursday.Different factions are prioritizing different aspects of the next stimulus. While Democrats seem unwilling to concede on a longer extension of federal unemployment, as well as a new eviction moratorium and more funding to states, Senate Republicans — especially Mitch McConnell, who called it a “red line” — have repeatedly said they would refuse any bill without liability protection for businesses that prevents workers from bringing COVID-19-related lawsuits. Yet the White House announced on July 31st that it would be willing to accept a deal without liability shields.As of Friday, August 7th, Democrats and Republicans have both said they’re not close to reaching a deal yet. Because of this, Trump has threatened to sign an executive order renewing the federal eviction moratorium and the federal unemployment boost. It may also include a payroll tax cut, which lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have opposed as ineffective. Schumer, Meadows, and Mnuchin have all expressed that an executive order is not a good solution, according to The Hill. How long will it take lawmakers come to a decision?There’s now a week left before Congress goes into recess until September. The frenzied hustle to pass the next stimulus package, like many other things about COVID-19 in the U.S., could have been avoided. The CARES Act was passed on March 27th, and there were immediate calls in Congress for another plan that would guarantee regular income for struggling households. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Rep. Tim Ryan (D-OH) introduced the Emergency Money for the People Act in mid-April, proposing a monthly stimulus payment of $2,000 for at least six months. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) introduced the Paycheck Guarantee Act, a measure that would have covered companies’ payrolls for at least three months, reducing the number of layoffs and the demand on unemployment offices. Many European countries quickly enacted a paycheck protection scheme that prevented layoffs and the kind of shocking effect on the economy that the U.S. is grappling with now. Throughout April and May, top Republican lawmakers continued to delay discussing what needed to come next, even with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell urging them not to allow federal relief measures to expire too soon. Now, having allowed the expiration of extra unemployment that served as a lifeline to many, lawmakers are locked in heated debate and racing against the clock, as August recess technically beginning after today. Lawmakers intend to delay recess and return to Congress next week to potentially vote on a bill — if top Democrats and Republicans can agree to a deal by then.Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Next Stimulus Has $1,200 And Protects CorporationsWill The Stimulus Bill Pass By Next Week?Why Are People Still Not Getting Unemployment?

  • Trump Is Using Racism To Appeal To “Suburban Housewives.” It’s Likely To Backfire.

    All summer long, President Donald Trump has attacked Democrats’ fair-housing policies with racist dog whistles, painting them as a threat to “The Suburban Housewives of America” and the “Suburban Lifestyle Dream.” Like most of what Trump says, the idea that Joe Biden and the Democrats want to “Abolish Suburbs” is complete bullshit. But this desperate rhetoric is worth examining because of what it reveals about the huge gap between how American suburbs are commonly perceived both demographically and politically, and what they are actually like.Why is Trump tweeting about the suburbs now? Trump’s tweets were ostensibly about his administration’s recent dismantlement of the Obama-era Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) rule, which required municipalities to fill out reports on barriers to fair housing in order to strengthen the Fair Housing Act of 1968. (Reportedly, few actually did so.) Trump’s claims that this rule had deprived people of the “American Dream” and had a “devastating impact” on suburban communities are not very credible, but they are an indication of his larger re-election plan: scaring white Americans into voting for him again. Trump is also doing this by attacking Biden’s housing plan, which is more ambitious than what the Obama administration had instituted. Biden wants to end redlining and other policies that have historically excluded Black families from fair access to housing, and helped create the economically and racially segregated communities many people live in now. Biden also wants Congress to create a program that would require communities receiving certain Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and Transportation grants to institute zoning changes that would increase neighborhoods’ affordability, diversity, and walkability. According to Trump, this is Biden’s grand plan to “abolish the suburbs.” The problem is, Trump’s appeal to suburban voters who are terrified of an integrated reality is as horrifying and out-of-date as segregated water fountains. In 2020, suburbs have become more racially and economically diverse, diminishing the Republican vision of lily-white, Pleasantville-like cocoons. Then too, the concept of “housewives” is archaic (outside of perhaps Bravo TV), especially as a large voting bloc, considering that women now outnumber men in the American workforce. While suburban voters are not a monolithic bloc, they are a powerful one — nearly half of voters live in the suburbs. It’s suburban voters in key swing states who helped Trump win office in 2016. But in 2018, it was also suburban voters who were instrumental in voting in the most diverse class of Democrats in history to gain control of the U.S. House of Representatives: 38 of the 41 districts Democrats flipped blue were suburban. Now, just when he needs it the most, Trump is steadily losing suburban support. Only 38% of suburban voters approve of Trump’s performance, while 59% disapprove, according to a New York Times/Siena College poll from June. Meanwhile, 65% have a favorable view of the Black Lives Matter movement. One in 10 suburban voters say they have participated in a protest, and their presence is felt in places like Portland, where a “Wall of Moms” led by a self-described “suburban wife” stood up to police. In that poll, Trump trails Biden by 16 points, 51% to 35%, in suburban areas. With the polls turned so resolutely against him, it’s no wonder Trump has been doing what he always does when he feels defensive: rambling, threatening, and fear-mongering, hoping that tricks from the ol’ reliable racist playbook will work if nothing else will.“Trump is playing old New York politics from the 1990s,” Jef Pollock, a Democratic pollster, told The New York Times. “The reality is that more and more suburban voters have embraced diversity as a positive thing for their community. They support the Black Lives Matter movement, and from an aspirational perspective, they want their children to grow up in a more tolerant and less divided country. What’s scary to them is the constant division and intolerance that Trump is promulgating.”Of course, racism is a feature of, not a bug in American society and it’s not exclusive to Trump voters. A lot of the suburban voters who support Black Lives Matter and have Biden signs on their lawns also oppose denser zoning, school redistricting, and defunding police departments. They have benefitted from and are quietly perpetuating a lot of the same racist policies that have existed since before the civil rights era, and have continued until now, where they occur in a “lite” format. But, as much as they may have profited from racism, they don’t like to be reminded of that fact — which is why Trump’s appeal to these voters doesn’t work.By pandering to a racist fantasy of American suburbs, Trump reveals not only the way in which his imagination is limited, but also how limited his abilities are as an effective campaigner with anyone other than his base. Unfortunately for Trump (if fortunately for America), if he wants to get the suburban vote, he’s going to have to accept a more complex reality than the one in his head. In the forthcoming book The Sprawl: Reconsidering the Weird American Suburbs, author Jason Diamond writes about the contradictions inherent to the suburbs, a place which still holds a unique position in the American imagination, aspirational and spiritually hollow all at once. Diamond said he found early on in his research that conservatives are “really obsessed” with the suburbs. It makes sense. The suburbs have long been presented in popular culture as the epitome of American greatness, the end point of the capitalist dream. But that dream was never meant to be for everyone. “The suburbs represented something to us for so long,” Diamond told Refinery29. “It was like, ‘You can have this house. And you can have this front yard and this backyard and this driveway. These things are yours.’ And that was pretty revolutionary. But it was also only extended to certain people. You couldn’t get that if you were Black.” Back in 2016, Trump’s unorthodox campaign tactics were novel, and they helped him win because he presented himself as being a respite from politics-as-usual. His base ate it up. But his fear-inducing tactics don’t seem to be working as well anymore — and that might be because people now have actual things to fear, rather than his made-up monsters. As we enter the sixth month of the horribly mismanaged coronavirus pandemic, it’s plain as day that Trump can’t actually protect Americans from those things that will really hurt us: a disastrous economy, massive unemployment, and rampant disease. Amid his failure to deliver even the basic form of security and public health standard, Trump’s rants about the suburbs are a transparent grab for attention, an indication that the thing he hates most is happening: He’s being ignored; he’s becoming irrelevant. And, not a moment too soon.Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Trump's AFFH Threat Impacts Communities Of ColorThe Housing Crisis Is A Black Lives Matter IssueRent Is Due. What If You Can't Pay?

  • Telfar Shopping Bags Highlight The Issue With Buying From Resellers

    Two weeks ago, Brooklyn-based unisex brand Telfar took to Instagram to share a message that many of the brand’s cult-like fans thought was their golden ticket to finally obtaining one of its iconic Shopping Bags. In it was an alert that a restock of the bags, which notoriously sell out in seconds, was coming. The Shopping Bag has been called the “Bushwick Birkin”— first, by makeup artist Xya Rachel, and later, by everyone who reads The Cut — for its reputation in the fashion industry as the bag to own, more so in some circles than even the Hermès purse it gets its nickname from. It is available in three sizes, an ever-growing array of colorways, and costs between $150 and $257, depending on size. The only problem is, with its affordable price tag and covetable reputation, actually getting your hands on one is next to impossible. And that’s before the bots and resellers come in.Despite the brand offering a how-to guide to snagging a Shopping Bag, even the most diligent of shoppers couldn’t compete with the bots that, in the end, broke Telfar’s website entirely. “Y’all broke our shop. Back later,” the brand posted a week later. (The website is back up now.) Once again, many missed out on the opportunity to join the Telfar community — one that prides itself on inclusivity. On Twitter, Bibby Gregory, the founder of Black Fashion Fair, wrote: “You missed the Telfar restock today?” followed by, “No — that wasn’t a question.” > No — that wasn’t a question.> > — AB/G (@bibbygregory) July 23, 2020Hypernova Group, a members-only resale site that allegedly secured a large percentage of the bags, was blamed for many shoppers leaving empty-handed. “Imagine buying up 60% of the Telfar restock just to resell them x2 the price,” @chrissnocrossx tweeted. The Telfar brand — whose mission statement on the website reads, “Not For You — For Everyone” — is about making luxury accessible to all people. Those familiar with Telfar Clemons, the founder and creative director of the brand, and the sense of belonging he created there, know better than to keep others from affording a Telfar original. The brand had a similar reaction to those halting his customers from adding to their collections. “Telfar is for the people, not bots,” it shared via Instagram stories. “Store on ice while we root them out.” Of the issue, Clemons himself said: “What the bots are doing goes against what we are about — we are not trying to create fake scarcity — we just have crazy demand.” Despite the buzz around the brand right now, the bot problem is hardly unique in the retail landscape. In reality, the inflated cost of a Telfar Shopping Bag doesn’t even come close to some of the resale prices for some sneaker partnerships. Take, for instance, Off-White’s collaboration with Converse. In May of 2018, the brands — one of which sells hoodies for upwards of $700 while the other offers high tops for $55 — released a sneaker called the Chuck Taylor All-Star Vulcanized Hi for the fair price of $130. After a surprise drop on — the entirety of which sold out in seconds — the sneakers were released again at a number of retailers. Not surprisingly, they also sold out in record time. Today, more than two years later, a deadstock or DS pair (a brand new pair that’s never been worn or removed from the box) will cost you anywhere between $985 and $1,560, according to StockX. On Farfetch, a pair from a third-party premier sneaker marketplace is priced at $2,369.> “What the bots are doing goes against what we are about — we are not trying to create fake scarcity — we just have crazy demand.” > > – Telfar ClemonsAs is the case with Telfar’s Shopping Bag, the Off-White x Converse sneakers were priced with intention. “This project is truly a democracy of how design explores the world,” Off-White’s creative director and founder Virgil Abloh told BoF. When the publication talked to Abloh prior to the launch of the “Top Ten” collection, this time between Off-White and Nike, he said: “I’m interested in how the kid that’s standing outside his or her local Foot Locker or Nike Town buying Jordans and taking my ideas gets inspired and takes a marker to the shoes or attaches a red zip tie and now they’re part of the conversation.” But rather than the drop being an opportunity for young, cash-strapped fashion lovers to buy a piece of Off-White pie, nearly every sneaker in the collection became more unattainable than even Off-White’s regular line in a matter of seconds. According to Six Figure Sneakerhead, a blog for the sneaker-obsessed, the only tried-and-true way to get your hands on a pair of rare Jordan, Yeezy, or Off-White sneakers is to use sneaker bots, price be damned. They are right — by now in the streetwear industry, unfortunately, bots and resellers are the norm.The same goes for many of H&M’s designer collaborations. The Swedish fast-fashion brand started working with designers back in 2004 when it launched a first-of-its-kind collaborative collection with the late Karl Lagerfeld. According to WWD, 500 to 2,000 pieces sold per hour in Manhattan’s Fifth Avenue store at the time of the release. The collection democratized design in a way that had never been done before — and set precedent for many high-low collections to come. Since then, H&M has launched more than 20 designer collections, with the list of brands ranging from Balmain to Stella McCartney and Alexander Wang. As with all H&M pieces, the items start out affordable. But once they sell out — which they almost always do, partly because of resellers — their stock prices skyrocket. Today, a dress from H&M’s Giambattista Valli collection can be found listed on Poshmark for $850. (To be fair, it was on the pricier side, to begin with, but the difference between its original price and its current retail price is still $300.) This, of course, ties back to capitalism. According to Marc Lotenberg, the CEO of W and Surface Magazine, “The law of supply and demand has never been as evident as it has been today in retail, with drop culture and the rise of resellers everywhere capitalizing on popularity and scarcity.” Lotenberg doesn’t share the same disdain for this process as some of Telfar’s frustrated fans. Instead, he believes that the fact that people are willing to buy a Telfar bag for double its intended price shows that the brand is “white hot.” He says, “Ultimately, consumers are going to try harder to be a part of the drop. If they want something bad enough, the lack of being able to obtain it — whether by scarcity or price point — continues to be a sure-fire way to drive interest and aspiration.” Lotenberg calls it a catch-22, explaining that either way, Telfar — and H&M, Off-White, Converse, etc. — wins when demand is as high as it is and quantity remains low. Even so, Telfar is a brand for the people. Money isn’t the priority.> View this post on Instagram> > BACK IN MY CITY, CALL ME A CITY GIRL @telfarglobal 💸👜 BuyBlack •☆° Honestly, I funks with @_thesixfigurechick_ ‘s quote ” I’m thankful for the people in my life that normalize luxury”. Mainly, as black people are seen as poor and always in poverty. So, when some of us choose to talk about it, we are judged for not doing enough. When we choose to do something about it, we get judged for pandering to white ideals. I can’t come and kill myself, if I’m broke with expensive taste. °☆• Not only is @telfarglobal a BlackOwnedBusiness , the designer Telfar Clemens has created luxury products that centres Black culture and allows ALL of us black folx to be the forefront of representation for the branding. Thank you @telfarclemens for using your visions to create a product so transformative and funking CUTE. This isn’t my only Telfar Shopping bag and it won’t be my last. I’ve wanted this product for years and I worked SO hard to secure it, even my entire family got involved in helping me secure this MARVELLOUS creation. So, if you see me in any streets near you rockin’ my ‘Bushwick Birkin’ being MAD protective of them and taking photos with them … KEEP YO F@*%ING DISTANCE!!!!! 💇🏽‍♀️ Hair by @ginaknightwigdesign Custom Flame BlackOwned 📸 @en_asiama •☆° ewurajaja sunset blackblogger contentcreator summer instadaily psootd psblogger fatgirljoy fatgirlmagic curvygirlsrock instabeauty instafollow instafashion plussize plussizemodel model BlackGirlMagic photography beauty makeup instaphoto blacknatural instahair instahair afro universodamaquiagem_oficial> > A post shared by Enam Asiama (@enamasiama) on Jul 18, 2020 at 11:44am PDTSo while sneakerheads may accept that bots (and their capitalist ties) are the norm, no devotees of Telfar will. “This isn’t my only Telfar Shopping Bag and it won’t be my last,” says London-based model Enam Asiama in an Instagram caption. “I’ve wanted this product for years and worked SO hard to secure it.” Asiama explained her reasoning by referencing a quote by Cici Gunn, the founder and CEO of The Six Figure Chick, that states: “I’m thankful for the people in my life that normalize luxury.” According to Asiama, “Black people are seen as poor and always in poverty. So, when some of us choose to talk about it, we are judged for not doing enough. When we choose to do something about it, we get judged for pandering to white ideals.” But Telfar’s Shopping Bags are designed by a Black man for Black people, as well as anyone else who wants one — a fact made clear by the designer and his choice of branding every step of the way. Part of him doing so means keeping his high-quality handbags accessible. And, that is the problem with resellers and bots buying up all of his stock and selling it at an inflated price. The act of upcharging for a Telfar bag goes against the brand’s mission entirely — and those consumers who support it with such fervor. Brie, or @brieyonce on Twitter, took to the platform to air her feelings about the bots that broke, saying: “I’ll make it my mission to alert the girls when Telfar restocks so everyone gets one for what it’s worth & no one purchases any from these ugly resellers.” The consensus? Let the resellers have this latest round of Shopping Bags; they won’t get business from any true Telfar loyalists. Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?Gap Is Not Moving Forward With Telfar PartnershipTelfar Debuts Converse Mary Janes On The RunwayTelfar Just Won The CFDA/Vogue Fashion Fund