• Home
  • Mail
  • News
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Search
  • Mobile
  • More
Yahoo
    • Skip to Navigation
    • Skip to Main Content
    • Skip to Related Content
    • Mail
    Lifestyle Home
    Follow Us
    • Style
    • Beauty
    • Wellness
    • Shopping
    • MAKERS
    • Holiday Guide for Guys
    • Pets
    • Video
    • Horoscopes
    • Pop Culture

    Sony's baffling wearable speaker heads to the US

    Devindra Hardawar
    Senior Editor
    EngadgetNovember 18, 2019
    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share
    View photos
    Sony

    Want the convenience of portable tunes but hate headphones and earbuds? Sony has a solution for you in its "Immersive Wearable Speaker" (SRS-WS1), which is perhaps the company's most aptly named piece of audio kit. You wear it around your neck, it emits sound, you get it. The speaker launched in Japan back in 2017 (we caught a glimpse of an earlier version during SXSW 2016), but now it's finally making its way to the US in December. It'll be available for an introductory price of $250 if you pre-order by December 1st, and $300 afterwards. The real question, though, is who would actually want it.

    I've been testing out the Immersive Wearable Speaker for the past week, and from the get-go, it was one of the strangest products I've ever used. It looks and feels like a quality Sony device, and it even sits on my neck well with excellent weight balance. But nothing about the speaker works the way you'd expect.

    For one, it's not Bluetooth compatible at all. Instead, you'll have to manually plug in 3.5mm or optical cables (ugh) into its wireless receiver. And since it's relying on physical connections, there aren't any playback controls on the speaker itself. All you've got is volume adjustment, vibration controls (which adds a bit of oomph to the low-end) and power.

    Sony is positioning the Immersive Wearable Speaker as something you'd connect to your TV for late night viewing, so you could think of it as a soundbar for your neck. But it's not actually a great TV solution at night, since it's still clearly audible to anyone else nearby. It's also astounding to me that a wireless product doesn't support Bluetooth, the most widely supported wireless standard out there. You can use a USB-C cable to quickly connect the speaker to a smartphone or tablet, but you'll still have to deal with the battery draining eventually. (Sony says it should last around 3 hours per charge.)

    Sony

    At least the Immersive Wearable Speaker comes with a charging stand, so it can look pretty when it's not in use.

    The speaker sounds fine for music, TV and movies, but for the price it left me wanting. FKA twig's "Fallen Alien" enveloped me with its luscious soundscape, but the haptic vibration couldn't make up for the fact that I was losing a considerable amount of detail. I've listened to that song several times on pricey headphones and my home theater setup, and the Wearable Speaker simply didn't feel as satisfying. And it was similarly dispiriting while watching HBO's Watchmen, a show that's driven by a thumping Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross score. I couldn't wait to put on a pair of headphones to finish the episode.

    The Immersive Wearable Speaker could be useful for older users who want to hear their favorite shows without donning headphones, and without cranking up the TV volume. It's also ergonomic enough to wear comfortably for hours on end. But the vast majority of consumers are better served with wireless headphones, earbuds, or in the case of TV viewing, a decent soundbar. I've had better audio experiences walking around with cheaper Bluetooth speakers, like the UE Megaboom 3 ($200).

    What's truly infuriating, though, is the eventual $300 price. (Update: Sony announced an early bird deal for $250 after this post was published.) That puts the Immersive Wearable Speaker at just $50 less than Sony's excellent WH-1000XM3 headphones, which are still my favorite pair of noise canceling cans. Sony, seemingly aware of its limited appeal, is only selling the Immersive Wearable Speaker through its Direct site. That's not too surprising, because I'd imagine most Best Buy shoppers wouldn't know what to make of it. (At the very least, I'd expect plenty of returns once people realize it doesn't support Bluetooth.)

    Making things even stranger is that third-party sellers have been importing the Immersive Wearable Speaker for a while now. The top Google search result for "SRS-WS1" is an Amazon listing for $219. Sony tells us that's an unauthorized reseller, so buyers won't get an official warranty, but I'd imagine anyone really interested in this thing would rather save $80. But seriously, if you're actually considering it, maybe have a friend try to talk you out of it first.

    Sony Immersive Wearable Speaker
    View photos
    Sony Immersive Wearable Speaker
    View photos
    Sony Immersive Wearable Speaker
    View photos
    Sony Immersive Wearable Speaker
    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share

    What to Read Next

    • Walmart Canada pulls 'Let It Snow' Christmas sweater featuring a cocaine-using Santa

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Bella Hadid Just Hit the Beach in a Seriously Revealing One-Piece Swimsuit

      Harper's Bazaar
    • Michelle Obama weighs in on President Trump impeachment hearings: ‘It’s surreal’

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Swe Zin Htet on being the first openly gay Miss Universe contestant: 'People in Myanmar are not accepting of this'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Two Women Landed in the ER After Using a Vacuum to End Their Periods, According to a Nurse's Scary Viral Tweet

      Meredith Videos
    • Catherine Zeta-Jones Posted an Emotional Tribute to Kirk Douglas on His 103 Birthday

      Country Living
    • Cardi B Covers 'Vogue' with Her Daughter Kulture

      Fashionista
    • Tarek El Moussa and Heather Rae Young Snap 'Family' Holiday Pic with Kids

      House Beautiful
    • 'Fuller House' Fans Are Losing Their Minds Over All the Easter Eggs in Season 5

      Good Housekeeping
    • 'Blue Bloods' Sparked a Wild Fan Theory About Eddie and Jamie After the Tense Fall Finale

      Country Living
    • Jennifer Lopez Ripped Off Her Tuxedo on ‘SNL’ to Reveal Her Iconic Versace Dress

      PureWow
    • Kendall Jenner's Nude Minidress Looks Like It's Dripping in Tinsel

      Harper's Bazaar
    • Meghan Markle Was Unrecognizable During an Early Charity Visit in a Baseball Cap and Jacket

      InStyle
    • Dr. Pimple Popper Is Back With New Episodes — & We Have The Exclusive Trailer

      Refinery29
    • Miley Cyrus’s new tattoo may be in direct reference to her split with Liam Hemsworth

      Hello Giggles
    • This local hardware store’s $130 commercial is being dubbed ‘the best Christmas ad of the year'

      In The Know

    'The evidence is overwhelming': Combative hearing moves House closer to impeachment

    Magic One: The Senate Trial is GOVERNED by the Senate Rules... and so is the Chairman during the Trial (Justice Roberts). This isn't a Criminal trial. The Senate Rules allow any group of 51 Senators to overrule the Chairman (Roberts) on many issues (like who will be subpoenaed to testify and who will not). If 51 (or more) Senators want to have Joe Biden, Adam Schiff, and Hunter Biden testify but the Chairman (Roberts) refuses, the Senators can overrule him and send the subpoenas and they WILL testify. Equally, if 51 Senators do NOT want someone to be subpoenaed to testify, they can quash the subpoena and stop them from testifying. "If the Senate did end up conducting a trial, Rule VII gives Chief Justice Roberts control over procedural aspects of the trial, including issuing orders for specific people to testify and making decisions about disputed points of the law. However, that same rule lets McConnell circumvent Roberts’ control, potentially in ways that could limit, or expand, the impeachment process. For instance, if the House members presenting the case wanted to subpoena a witness who might give evidence against Trump, senators could ask Roberts to block the subpoena. If he refused, they could overrule him, again by a simple majority in a Republican-controlled Senate. McConnell could also use Rule VII to introduce into the trial new information that would be to Trump’s political benefit – such as asking Roberts to subpoena Joe Biden and his son Hunter, which could heighten the partisan divide, and distract or confuse the public about who is on trial for what. If Roberts declined, again the senators themselves could vote to issue the subpoenas." ================================= "Critically, and contrary to common mythology and parlance, the chief justice is not the “judge” in an impeachment trial. The Senate itself is both judge and trier of fact, and the chief justice serves as its presiding officer. The rules thus require the chief justice to direct “all forms of the proceedings” (Rule 7) and, in so doing, “to make and issue all orders, mandates, writs, and precepts authorized by the rules” (Rule 5)." The Republicans hold the Senate Majority and can easily get 51 votes to overrule Roberts... with votes to spare.

    Join the Conversation
    1 / 5

    8k

    • Emma Stone Debuted Her Pearl Engagement Ring at the 'SNL' After-Party

      Harper's Bazaar
    • Dwayne Johnson Has Mixed Feelings About Still Being Called "The Rock"

      Good Housekeeping
    • Kelly Ripa and Daughter Lola Stepped Out in Complementary Mini Dresses

      InStyle
    • Cardi B Just Got Hella Candid About Those Offset Cheating Rumors in a ‘Vogue’ Interview

      Cosmopolitan
    • We asked podiatrists to name the world's most comfortable shoes — here are their top 6 picks

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • "Milky Nails" Are the Manicure Trend You're Going to See All Throughout 2020

      Allure
    • Camila Cabello Just Joked That Shawn Mendes Might Break Up With Her

      Seventeen
    • We’re Obsessed With This Recyclable Material That Looks Just Like Terrazzo

      House Beautiful
    • Act fast! The Instant Pot DUO Plus is 50 percent off

      In The Know
    • Abandoned 5-Year-Old Carries Toddler in Extreme Cold After Adult Allegedly Left Them in Home

      People
    • Lizzo sparked a Twitter debate after wearing a revealing outfit to a Lakers game

      Hello Giggles
    • Woman asked to leave American Airlines flight over ‘ironic’ T-shirt: ‘People usually laugh at it’

      In The Know
    • Cardi B Wears the Colors of the Ghanaian Flag in a Bikini and 5-Inch Stilettos

      Footwear News
    • 'It's long overdue:' After T.I.'s controversial 'hymengate,' NY lawmakers hope to ban 'virginity testing'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Jennifer Lopez jokes about turning 50 and strips down to her iconic green Versace dress on 'Saturday Night Live'

      Yahoo Lifestyle
    • Teen boy goes blind after only eating Pringles, white bread, pork and French fries

      Yahoo Lifestyle