Bipartisan Push To Cut Off Military Gear From Police Departments Falls Short In Senate
Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a bipartisan effort to limit certain kinds of military weapons and gear from flowing to local police departments nationwide.
For decades, the 1033 program has enabled the Defense Department to sell excess and outdated military equipment like armored vehicles, drones, grenade launchers, tear gas and bayonets, to local law enforcement agencies. Over $7.4 billion of equipment has gone to more than 8,000 law enforcement agencies, according to Wired.
President Barack Obama curtailed the program in 2015 after public reaction to images of heavily militarized police in the streets of Ferguson, Missouri, amid protests over the shooting of Michael Brown. However, former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions revived it upon taking office under President Donald Trump in 2017, citing the support of police unions.
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) introduced an amendment this month to the annual defense bill, trying to reform the program by prohibiting tear gas, armor-piercing firearms and ammunition, bayonets, grenades, grenade launchers, combat tracked vehicles, and drones from getting in the hands of police. The proposal would also have instituted transparency to the program by creating a website to track the transfer of property under the 1033 program.
“It is time to demilitarize the police. Weapons of war has no place at police departments,” Schatz said in a floor speech on Tuesday.
It had bipartisan support ― including from Republican senators like Rand Paul (Ky.) and Lisa Murkwoski (Alaska) and conservative groups like the FreedomWorks and American Conservative Union. Two vulnerable GOP senators facing tough reelection fights in November joined Murkowski and Paul in voting for the measure: Cory Gardner (Colo.) and Steve Daines (Mont.).
The effort was stymied on Tuesday, however, thanks to large opposition from Senate Republicans. Fifty-one senators backed the measure, short of the 60 votes required for adoption.
Senate Armed Services Chairman Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) called the 1033 program an “effective use of the taxpayer’s money” and said Schatz’s amendment would “make the program virtually impossible to use.”
“He doesn’t like the program. He wants to kill the program. We’re not going to allow this to happen,” Inhofe said, citing the support of law enforcement organizations like the National Sheriffs’ Association and the National Fraternal Order of Police.
Inhofe offered a competing amendment to the defense bill that would limit the transfer of a more narrow list of military equipment — including drones, weaponized tracked vehicles, and lethal grenades ― to police departments. However, does not prohibit tear gas, grenade launchers, or large-caliber weapons and ammunition, from going to police departments. The Senate successfully adopted that amendment in a 90-10 vote.
The debate over the militarization of police in the Senate took place as Trump threatened to send more federal troops to major American cities, following the federal crackdown on Portland protests against police brutality. Unidentified federal officers in the Oregon city used unmarked cars and worn military-style camouflage on the streets, drawing condemnation from Democrats and Republicans alike.
“We cannot give up liberty for security. Local law enforcement can and should be handling these situations in our cities but there is no place for federal troops or unidentified federal agents rounding people up at will,” Paul tweeted Monday.
Related...
House Democrats Urge Probe Into Trump's Use Of Federal Officers To Quell Protests
Trump Has Unleashed Authoritarian Violence In Portland. What City Is Next?
Chicago Mayor Urges Trump Not To Send 'Secret' Federal Agents To City
Love HuffPost? Become a founding member of HuffPost Plus today.
This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.
