The Medical Tests Some People Over 65 May Not Need
Photo: skynesher/E+/Getty Images
Nobody wants to be subjected to medical tests they don’t need, but that’s exactly what’s happening to thousands of people across the U.S., according to a new study published online by JAMA Internal Medicine.
In the study, researchers evaluated rates of colorectal, cervical, prostate, and breast cancer screening in people 65 or older using data from the National Health Interview Survey from 2000 through 2010. A total of 27,404 participants were grouped by their risk of dying during the next nine years from an illness other than the type of cancer involved in the screening.
Approximately half of the men screened for prostate cancer were deemed likely to die in the next nine years. Roughly one-third of women screened for cervical or breast cancer similarly had a high risk of death. For both men and women, 41 percent of those who were screened for colorectal cancer should not have undergone the screenings because they, too, had a very high risk of mortality for the same time period.
In other words, a high percentage of people who were very sick still got a cancer screening test that offered them virtually zero benefit, because detecting early signs of cancer isn’t beneficial for those who are going to die of something else in the next several years, whether it be old age or another illness.
The findings raise concerns about excessive screening, “which not only increases health care expenditure but can lead to patient net harm,” writes lead author Trevor J. Royce at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
“Creating simple and reliable ways to assess life expectancy in the clinic may allow reduction of unnecessary cancer screening, which can benefit the patient and substantially reduce health care costs,” added Royce.
"It is particularly important to question screening strategies for older persons,” writes Cary P. Gross, M.D., of the Yale University School of Medicine, in a related commentary.