What the #MeToo movement has taught us — among other things — is that most workplaces don’t have safe, effective channels for reporting predatory behavior. And that goes double for unconventional workplaces like, say, the set of a reality TV show.
More from SheKnows
- Chanel Miller Is on TIME's Next 100 & Glamour's Women of the Year -- Here's Why That's So Monumental
- Michelle Pfeiffer Opens Up About an 'Uncomfortable' & 'Inappropriate' #MeToo Experience
- Jennifer Aniston Opens Up About Being Bullied By Harvey Weinstein -- & His 'Piggish Behavior'
There were SO MANY “NO” moments in tonight’s episode of @SurvivorCBS. On top of the wrong person being sent home, the silence of certain people, especially certain women was disturbing. The silence was deafening on film, and even more so on all of their social media tonight. WOW.
— Daniel Rengering (@DanielRengering) November 14, 2019
Let’s start from the beginning because the story itself is a bit complicated. On Wednesday’s episode of Survivor, Kim brought up Spilo’s unwanted physical contact several times, once with fellow contestant Missy Byrd.
In an unexpected move, a crew member addressed Kim directly and promised to put an end to the behavior. The producers then reportedly met with Spilo and issued a formal warning. At the end of the night, however, a majority of contestants voted for Kim to leave the island — while Spilo remained.
#Survivor just showed what would happen if a victim came forward with complaint. Accused would be let go, people supporting accused would lie to your face. People like Aaron, Missy and Elizabeth are proof why abusers like Dan are let go by society.
— Azor30Ahai12 (@sujayazorahai) November 15, 2019
This alone — the decision to dole out a warning without consequences, and approve Kim’s swift exit from the show — showed poor judgment from Survivor‘s producers.
On their watch, a contestant was repeatedly harassed by a fellow contestant. Even if the producers themselves weren’t the ones casting the votes, it looks an awful lot like silencing to send a woman home right after she voices that complaint.
But unfortunately, the story — and how Survivor has chosen to frame the story — gets even worse. During the episode, Byrd and a third female contestant, Elizabeth Beisel, revealed that they had fabricated their own accusations against Spilo, and had never been harassed by the contestant.
— Nova (@Novelleexo) November 14, 2019
Byrd and Beisel’s decision to falsely accuse Spilo was part of a strategy in the game, and a larger plan to get Kim sent home. In the backlash that’s followed from this episode, both have posted apologies online, saying they didn’t recognize how serious the situation was at the time.
While there’s no doubt that Byrd and Beisel’s behavior was despicable, it’s equally shocking that Survivor — and the public at large — are choosing to focus on these false accusations rather than Kim’s real report of harassment.
Where is the outrage at Spilo for repeatedly touching Kim in a way that made her feel uncomfortable? Where is the outrage at the producers for releasing an episode in which Byrd and Beisel are clearly painted as the villains — and Spilo not at all?
There is a long history of women being called liars when they report sexually predatory behavior. And yet, the most commonly cited study on the subject, from Violence Against Women, places the actual prevalence of false allegations at 2-10%.
For years @JeffProbst & Survivor prided themselves on the inclusivity of the cast and progressive way they handled real world issues in their “microcosm.” Tonight they failed to step in & showed exactly why true survivors of sexual harassment don’t report. Disappointed. #Survivor
— Lisa Gibbons (@lisamgibbons25) November 14, 2019
Survivor had an opportunity to take a woman’s experience of being harassed seriously and enact real consequences on the perpetrator. Instead, they chose to shift America’s focus to the 2-10% of allegations that end up being untrue, further perpetuating the idea that women will happily lie about this kind of behavior to get what they want.
It’s a shame that Byrd and Beisel themselves chose to perpetuate that notion. But in all their months of editing, it’s an even greater shame that Survivor didn’t reconsider what message they wanted to send.
Best of SheKnows
- 11 Female Film Characters Who Made an Impact in 2018
- Winter Movies That Aren't About Christmas You Can Enjoy Right Now