• Home
  • Mail
  • Flickr
  • Tumblr
  • News
  • Sports
  • Finance
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Answers
  • Groups
  • More
Yahoo
    • Skip to Navigation
    • Skip to Main Content
    • Skip to Related Content
    Entertainment Home
    Follow Us
    • Stagecoach
    • TV
    • Movies
    • Celebrity
    • Music
    • Videos
    • Reviews
    • Movie Showtimes

    Senators Find Agreement On Obamacare Payments, Only To Have Trump Flip-Flop On Them

    Matt Fuller
    HuffPostOctober 17, 2017
    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share

    WASHINGTON ― Republican and Democratic senators on Tuesday afternoon announced they had reached an agreement on how to stabilize the Affordable Care Act’s private insurance markets, offering hope that bipartisan action on “Obamacare” might actually be possible.

    But those hopes seemed dimmer by the evening, when President Donald Trump, who had praised the deal just hours before, called it a “bailout for insurance companies” ― a sentiment he repeated Wednesday morning on Twitter.

    The bipartisan agreement would fund the so-called Cost Sharing Reductions, which reimburse insurers for the cost of special, more generous plans they offer exclusively to low-income customers. Trump announced last week that he planned to stop those subsidy payments, which have been the subject of an ongoing legal dispute, in an effort to further dismantle Obamacare.

    But rather than blow up the law, the president’s move seemed to reignite negotiations between the ranking members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Republican Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Democrat Patty Murray of Washington. For weeks, the two had discussed ways of funding the CSR payments while giving states more flexibility on the plans they offer.

    “This takes care of the next two years,” Alexander, the committee’s chairman, told reporters on Tuesday. “After that, we can have a full-fledged debate on where we go long-term on health care.”

    Alexander was careful to point out the proposal’s relatively narrow scope: “I’d like to undersell it, not oversell it.” But it is expected to get significant support from Democrats. Alexander said he and Murray were now working to get cosponsors from both sides of the aisle and to present Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) with a bill by the end of the week.

    While the actual deal itself is still being finalized, Alexander’s description was that, in exchange for funding the payments to insurers, the agreement would amend the authority of the Department of Health and Human Services to accept more state applications to waive certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act.

    The changes, according to Senate aides, would allow HHS to approve waiver requests more quickly, speeding up a process that state officials have frequently decried as too slow. The agreement would also allow governors to seek waivers on their own authorities rather than seeking acts of state legislatures.

    The changes would also clear the way for insurers to offer policies with higher deductibles and out-of-pocket costs than the law allows today ― effectively adding a layer of “copper” plans that would be less generous than the minimal “bronze” plans now on the market. The theory is that such plans would have lower premiums and would give individuals the option of more “catastrophic coverage” insurance.

    Alexander got language allowing states to show their waiver requests will achieve “comparative affordability,” which basically means they would have more leeway over who ends up with what kind of insurance. Murray signed off on this, Senate aides said, but only after Alexander agreed to additional language protecting low-income consumers, people with serious medical problems and other “vulnerable” populations.

    As a carrot to Democrats, the deal adds more than $100 million in outreach funding to promote ACA signups, basically replacing the money that the Trump administration has cut, and it would authorize new spending to finance reinsurance programs, which help reduce premiums by reimbursing insurers for some of the costs associated with their most expensive beneficiaries. (Congress would still have to appropriate that money separately.)

    Alexander made it clear that other key protections in the Affordable Care Act, including a requirement that all plans cover “essential health benefits” ― including maternity care, prescription drugs and hospitalization ― would remain in place. So would the prohibition on denying coverage or charging higher premiums to people with pre-existing conditions.

    “But it does give states significant new flexibility in terms of offering policies,” Alexander said.

    When McConnell was asked about the tentative deal ― whether it was a “tacit endorsement” of Obamacare ― he said Republicans hadn’t had a chance to think about the way forward yet and he referred questions to Alexander and Murray.

    Trump was less circumspect ― and also less consistent.

    Early in the day, Trump suggested that Obamacare was “virtually dead” ― “as far as I’m concerned, it really is dead” ― and he bashed the CSR payments as money that “goes to the insurance companies to line their pockets.”

    These statements were consistent with what Trump said on Monday, when he was emphatic that Obamacare was “finished.”

    “It’s dead. It’s gone. You shouldn’t even mention it. It’s gone. There is no such thing as Obamacare anymore,” Trump said in the Rose Garden.

    But later on Tuesday, Trump said the White House was involved in the negotiations with Alexander and Murray and he suggested that he could support the deal.

    “But it is a short-term solution so that we don’t have this very dangerous little period, including dangerous period for insurance companies, by the way, for a period of one year, two years, we will have a very good solution,” Trump said. “But we are going to have a great solution, ultimately, for health care, okay? But they are working together. And I know very much what they’re doing, okay?”

    “It will get us over the intermediate hump,” Trump said.

    By Tuesday evening, Trump seemed less enthusiastic, praising the bipartisan effort but criticizing the agreement itself. “I’m pleased the Democrats have finally responded to my call for them to take responsibility for their Obamacare disaster and work with Republicans to provide much-needed relief to the American people,” Trump said during a speech at the Heritage Foundation.

    “While I commend the bipartisan work done by Senators Alexander and Murray ― and I do commend it ― I continue to believe Congress must find a solution to the Obamacare mess instead of providing bailouts to insurance companies,” Trump said.

    Then, the next morning, he tweeted out the same thoughts.

    I am supportive of Lamar as a person & also of the process, but I can never support bailing out ins co's who have made a fortune w/ O'Care.

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 18, 2017

    It’s not clear how, if at all, this deal would affect plans and options for next year, given that open enrollment is set to begin in less than three weeks. Many carriers raised their rates preemptively for 2018, in case Trump cut off the insurer payments, while others are scrambling to do so now.

    If the insurers get the payments after all, because some version of the Alexander-Murray agreement becomes law, the carriers will end up with extra money. There are ways to avoid that ― like having the insurers give consumers rebates, or somehow finding a way to let them bring premiums back down. Senators said they were aware of the problem and working on ways to make sure insurers don’t “double dip”, as Schumer put it, although they gave no details about what ideas were under discussion.

    It’s also still unclear whether the agreement has enough support in Congress. As Alexander said Tuesday, he and Murray were working now to build bipartisan support. It seems likely that, in the Senate, nearly all Democrats would vote for the deal, as would a number of Republicans.

    When HuffPost asked GOP lawmakers about CSR payments on Tuesday, rank-and-file Republicans sounded supportive of doing something to ensure that premiums were workable.

    “It’s probably a good idea for Congress to step in and at least address that part of the issue,” Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) told HuffPost.

    Kansas Republican Sen. Pat Roberts said anything lawmakers could do on health care to provide some relief would be a positive step. Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wy.) said he had encouraged Alexander to work with Murray toward an agreement. And Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), one of the three Republicans who was steadfast in her opposition to repealing Obamacare, said she was “very optimistic” about a bipartisan deal.

    The big questions now are whether McConnell will bring the deal to the floor in the Senate, and whether House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) would do the same in the House.

    The speaker’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Democrats could insist on passage of the CSR payments on a number of upcoming must-pass bills, including a government funding measure in December.

    But the deal ultimately hinges on Trump. It’s hard to imagine Senate or House Republicans ― particularly McConnell or Ryan ― standing up to Trump on not passing a CSR bill, particularly because so few GOP lawmakers will be needed to get such a bill over the finish line.

    And after Tuesday, counting on Trump’s support for the proposal would seem like a foolish bet.

    (Tom Williams via Getty Images)
    (Tom Williams via Getty Images)

    This article has been updated to include additional information about the Alexander-Murray deal and Trump’s comments on Tuesday evening, as well as a tweet from Trump on Wednesday.

    • This article originally appeared on HuffPost.
    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share

    What to Read Next

    • Kanye West Posts Photos Inside $60M House As Kim Responds: 'We Had a Rule to Not Show Our Home'

      People
    • Kim Kardashian reveals she and husband Kanye West have 'different feelings' about Donald Trump

      AOL.com
    • Patton Oswalt congratulates late wife Michelle McNamara as suspected Golden State Killer is arrested — even if sheriff won't (updated)

      Yahoo Celebrity
    • NBA Vet Derek Fisher Is Engaged to the Ex-Wife of Former Teammate and Rival Matt Barnes

      People
    • Mom Of 5 Says, ‘I’m Really Good At Getting Pregnant And Having Kids. I Just Don’t Know How To Raise Them’

      Dr. Phil CBS
    • Kim Kardashian nearly shows her lady bits in racy pic for beauty line

      Yahoo Celebrity
    • Hot Mama! Kim Kardashian West's Sexiest Photos Since Welcoming Baby Chicago

      People
    • Chance on Kanye’s Trump Tweets: “Black People Don’t Have to Be Democrats”

      Pitchfork
    • Judge Rules Trump Administration Must Restore DACA Program In Full

      Yahoo View
    • Love Triangle Murder-Suicide: Woman Fatally Shoots Husband's Alleged Mistress Before Killing Self

      People
    • Trump hypocrisy: Cohen fails Trump’s own 5th amendment standard

      Yahoo View
    • Why A Son Claims His Mother Being Sober Is ’20 Times Worse’ Than When She Was On Drugs

      Dr Phil
    • John Legend May Have Responded to Kanye's Pro-Trump Stance

      Complex
    • Prince William Hints at Royal Baby's Name, Says Newborn Son Is 'Sleeping Well'

      Entertainment Tonight
    • Watch Donald Trump try and fail to kiss Melania Trump at State Arrival Ceremony

      Yahoo Entertainment
    • Was Blake Shelton throwing shade at Miranda Lambert with 'karma' tweet?

      Yahoo Music

    Carson plan would raise rent for millions in public housing

    Roger: The problem is not welfare, it is the availability of good jobs and the ever increasing cost of health care, and how our politicians will not address those issues. As recently as 1980 62% of jobs were considered middle class positions, and many did not require a college degree. Today 44% of jobs fall into that category, and more of them require a degree. ..... For example in 1980 most big retail stores used 65% full time employees with benefits, today they use 90% part timers with no benefits. The main reason so many companies have been using more and more part time employees, temporary employees, and 1099 contractors is the ever increasing cost of group health insurance..... Also in 1980 having a high school diploma meant a person could read write and so simple math. Today a HS diploma does not carry much weight, so HR people now require a degree for positions that used to be done by HS graduates.. I believe most people still use welfare as a last resort, that unfortunately becomes a long term solution

    Join the Conversation
    1 / 5

    1.8k

    • Kanye West spouts off on Trump and Obama as Kim Kardashian tells people to back off mental health speculation

      Yahoo Celebrity
    • Enrique Iglesias Shares First Adorable Snap With Both Of His Twins -- See the Pic!

      Entertainment Tonight
    • Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx Caught Leaving Restaurant Separately After Date Night in N.Y.C.

      People
    • Photo of Barack Obama Consoling George W. Bush Has New Poignance with Bush's Dad Hospitalized

      People
    • Sean Hannity Smacks Down Stormy Daniels Lawyer’s Offer to Come on Show: ‘Old News’

      The Wrap
    • A bad hair day for Kylie Jenner and Stormi makes for one of the best photos of them yet

      Yahoo Celebrity
    • Husband of woman sucked out of Southwest plane speaks out

      Yahoo View
    • ‘Glass': M Night Shyamalan’s Indie Horror Worlds Collide in CinemaCon Trailer

      The Wrap
    • Russell Simmons: $5 Million Sexual Assault Lawsuit Dismissed

      Rolling Stone
    • How this 15-year-old actor with autism channeled his own traumatic childhood on 'The Good Doctor'

      Yahoo TV
    • Prince William gives little update on royal baby No. 3

      AOL.com
    • Elizabeth Banks's R-rated joke about new 'Venom' trailer ignites a celebrity Twitter conversation

      Yahoo Movies
    • Gigi Hadid's 'Golden Birthday' Bash With Famous Friends

      Yahoo View
    • Avengers: Infinity War reviews: Here's what critics are saying

      Entertainment Weekly
    • 45 years after 'The Exorcist,' William Friedkin believes he's seen (and filmed) an exorcism

      Yahoo Movies
    • Inside Alleged Secret Society of ‘Slaves’ and ‘Masters’ That Allison Mack Is Accused of Helping Run

      People