It’s been over two years since 'The Biggest Loser' aired a new episode, although the hit NBC series was never officially canceled, and the network is fighting a subpoena that aims to get to the bottom of the show’s nonrenewal.
invisible hand: Politics, especially at the level of a presidential election are a fertile ground for what is referred to by campaign strategists as "dirty tricks." Pretty obvious Trump was dealt two of them, the video of him which referenced "grabbing kitty" to sway women voters and the Steele dossier to set-up the "insurance policy." Wikileaks, not Trump dealt the Clinton campaign a "dirty trick" by releasing DNC emails but those were not fabricated, just truth the party did not want the electorate to ever know about. While this article is heartening for a Trump supporter I contend the attempt to discredit Trump by claiming "Russian collusion" in fact acted as a smokescreen to deflect from the real foreign collusion in the election, that of Hillary Clinton and the Saudis. Just before he embarked for Washington DC and New York City in his new role as Crown Prince MBS (the very same guy implicated in the brutal murder of a journalist) gave an interview to Jordanian state media outlet Petra in which he made several bombshell admissions which if our government is at all serious about foreign collusion need to be thoroughly investigated. The prince claimed that over the years, his country had supported presidential candidates from both parties (the Bushes?) but in the then current cycle "even though she is a woman" they were backing Hillary. He went on to state that such support amounted to underwriting 20% of her campaign costs. Hillary set a record there, outspending the former record held by Obama's campaign. If true this is a serious breech of our election laws which prohibit candidates from accepting foreign funds. Billionaire liberal gadfly Tom Steyer accused Trump of doing that and called for his impeachment for doing so. You would think the Saudis would not shell out 20% of 1.2 billion out of the goodness of their hearts, they probably wanted something in return? If you recall (if you don't a quick google search will verify) while campaigning Hillary on numerous occasions pledged that once elected she would increase BY 550% the number of Syrian refugees Obama had already allowed entry into America. Now ask yourself a question and be honest with the answer. Do you think Hillary pledge to admit more Muslims into America was done to help her win support from swing voters or to appease her Saudi benefactors?