Michael Wolff on Roger Ailes' Final Days and a Complicated Murdoch Relationship

I made a mental note last night to call Roger in the morning and get his take on the Trump events of the last few days. There are few conversations more entertaining and insightful than Roger Ailes on Republican politics, where he's known all the players, their strengths and particularly their weaknesses. While he was a bête noir to liberals, his most scathing and often hilarious critiques have often been reserved for conservatives. His 50 years among the kahunas of GOP politics - as one of the creators of modern Republican politics - made him, among his other political claims to fame, among his party's sharpest observers. On his friend Donald Trump, no one has been keener. But at 8:30 this morning, his wife Beth texted me that he had died a few minutes ago at age 77.

It was a particular cruelty of the anti-Ailes press that it often focused on Beth, with rumors of a breakdown in their marriage and impending divorce. In fact, she was fierce in her devotion to him and his most implacable defender. In the 10 months since he had been forced out as chairman of Fox News Channel, the network - arguably the most significant political force in American life for a generation - that he launched, built and ran for 20 years, she carried him. This past autumn, after their hard summer of accusations and media conviction, she had flown down to Palm Beach and bought for them a waterfront mansion, where she hoped he would retire and where living well would at least be some revenge.

Retirement was more Beth's idea than his. Roger and I spoke a week ago, just after the last ouster at Fox - Bill Shine, his lieutenant, who had taken over his job, following by a week the ouster of Bill O'Reilly - and, invariably, the subject was Fox's quickly eroding fortunes and the possibilities for a new conservative network. Roger, still proscribed by the noncompete provisions of his separation agreement, nevertheless had a plan in his head and was taking calls. "I can't call. But I can't stop people from calling me," he said. As we spoke, Beth texted pictures of their view and of a newly svelte Roger lying lazily in the sun.

For more news videos visit Yahoo View, available on iOS and Android.

All things considered, it was a happy winter. Or, anyway, he was certainly weighing the benefits of being out of the office and out of the fray. Still, clearly, both he and Beth could only get so far from the bitterness they felt about his end at Fox. Worse still, the terms of his departure from Fox put draconian limits on what he could say and how he might defend himself. The payout that he believed he had earned - having created a $30 billion asset and 21st Century Fox's most profitable business - was the price of his silence. The most voluble and pugnacious man in American media was forced to keep still.

But privately, angrily, he couldn't wait to settle scores.

In his view, the political showdown that was always bound to happen - which, to me, he had predicted several years before - had finally happened, albeit uglier, and with more finality, than he had ever expected. "They got the memo," he said, with some forbearance. "If you strike the king, you better kill him."

By "they," he meant Rupert Murdoch's sons. And most particularly James Murdoch, who, two years ago, was elevated to CEO of his father's company, and whom Ailes regarded as an impetuous, grandiose, self-satisfied rich kid. Wryly, he admitted bringing this feud on himself. "I made the money those kids spent. So, no, I wasn't going to suck up to them."

Indeed, not long before his ouster, Ailes had enraged James by going around his back and helping to persuade his father to squelch a plan for a new, temple-like 21st Century Fox headquarters that James wanted to build.

The relationship of Ailes to Murdoch senior, often his loyal patron but frequently just a boss stuck having to indulge his highest earner, was also always a fraught one. When I wrote my Murdoch biography in 2009, one of the few stipulations of my access to Murdoch was that I not interview Ailes, who, I gathered, Rupert felt got too much credit for the company's success.

In July, over a two-week period of press leaks after former Fox anchor Gretchen Carlson filed a sexual harassment lawsuit, Ailes was ousted without an opportunity to defend himself. Even when James hired the law firm of Paul, Weiss, to investigate the charges against Ailes, Ailes himself wasn't called. In effect, in order to get his payout, he had to accept his disgrace - and it was enough money that he agreed to what he surely considered a devil's bargain.

It is, of course, impossible to know what might be true or not. And now it can never entirely be known. Surely, his political enemies, the legions of them, were concerned much less for the truth than that he be gone. As surely, less is true than what the various lawsuits allege, because that is the nature of lawsuits. All of us who know what Roger reflexively talks like, irascibly, caustically and with retrograde vividness, give him, at least privately, the benefit of the doubt.

In the end, the larger story is about someone who, from Nixon's "silent majority" to Reagan's "Reagan Democrats" to Fox News, understood the intensity of the unhappiness and anger in another America that we liberal media people are only now waking up to with Donald Trump.

More personally, when you're in the media business, what you look for is someone who is at the top of his craft, who understands the real score, who knows how to gossip and who has stories to tell. If you missed knowing Roger, you missed out.

Read more: Michael Wolff: It's James Murdoch's Fox News Now