Home
Mail
Tumblr
News
Sports
Finance
Entertainment
Lifestyle
Answers
Groups
Mobile
More

Search

Skip to Navigation
Skip to Main Content
Skip to Related Content

Mail

Entertainment Home

Follow Us

Diversity in Hollywood
Oscars
TV
Movies
Celebrity
Music
Videos
Movie Showtimes

Marvin Bagley posterized Moe Wagner in Summer League debut

Yahoo Sports Videos•July 3, 2018

Sacramento Kings rookie Marvin Bagley III announced his presence in Summer League with a huge poster dunk of Los Angeles Lakers rookie Moe Wagner.

What to Read Next

Comedian Brody Stevens Dies at 48
Variety
Boyfriend Elbows Girlfriend in the Head to Catch Hockey Puck — Then Gives It to Another Woman!
People
Gwyneth Paltrow Says She's The Real Victim In Ski Slope Hit-Run
HuffPost
'Tucker Carlson Tonight' guest says African-Americans 'need to move on' from slavery
Yahoo TV
Ariana Grande's Fans Call Her Out for Sleeping with Her Makeup On — and Her Clapback Is Epic
People
Jordyn Woods Lashes Out After Blow-Up with Kardashians: ‘It’s Been Real’
TheBlast
Lamar Odom 'Hates' That Khloé Kardashian Has Been 'Hurt Again' and 'Wants to Reach Out': Source
People
Robert Kraft Isn't 'Biggest Name Involved' in Human Trafficking Scandal: Reports
People
Charles Barkley Clowns on Jussie Smollett: ‘He Shoulda Just Went Out in Liam Neeson’s Neighborhood!’
TheBlast
Robert Kraft Is a 'Different Person' After Wife's Death, Source Says Amid Prostitution Scandal
People
Don Lemon to Jussie Smollett: If Charges Are True, ‘Confess, Throw Yourself on the Mercy of the Court’
The Wrap
Spike Lee on his long road from 'Do the Right Thing' to 'BlacKkKlansman'
Yahoo Movies
Khloé Kardashian Unfollows Jordyn Woods on Instagram... But Still Follows Tristan Thompson
People
R. Kelly arrested, charged in Chicago with sexual abuse
Associated Press
Clark Gable’s Grandson, Who Hosted ‘Cheaters,’ Found Dead at 30
Variety
Jussie Smollett Dropped From LGBTQ Charity Project Following Arrest
TheBlast

Girl banned from wearing MAGA hat claims school is violating her First Amendment rights

Pipper: the Supreme Court laid out in four landmark decisions. Schools may restrict students’ speech if it: is likely to disrupt school is lewd promotes illegal drug use, or is part of the curriculum or communications sponsored by the school. The younger the students, the more leeway schools have to control their speech. Several lower courts have recognized another principle: The younger the students, the more leeway schools have to control their speech. (By the same token, colleges and universities have less latitude when they try to restrict older students’ speech.) Disruptive Speech The Supreme Court found that a school violated students’ First Amendment rights by suspending them for wearing black armbands as an antiwar protest (an example of what’s known as “symbolic speech”). As the court explained, school officials may not squelch the expression of unpopular opinions just to avoid “discomfort and unpleasantness.” Instead, they need to show that the banned speech would create a “substantial disruption” at school or would violate other students’ rights. (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 393 U.S. 503 (1969).) Students, school administrators, and lower courts often disagree about what qualifies as a substantial disruption. The issue is even more complicated now, when so many controversies over disruptive speech are related to social media posts and other online speech. Courts consider several factors when deciding whether disruption from a student’s speech is too disruptive, including: Did it interfere with classwork or other school activities? Did it cause disorder on campus? Were other students so upset that they couldn’t concentrate or visited school counselors in droves? Did administrators and/or teachers have to take considerable time away from their regular duties in order to deal with the fallout? School officials don’t have to prove that a student’s speech already interfered with school before they take action. But in order to justify punishing the student, administrators do need to show that it was reasonable for them to predict that would happen. The fear of disruption has to be specific and significant. Vague or general worries aren’t enough. Along with the content of the speech, context and tone matter. Vulgar Speech In another case where a high school student gave a speech at school that was filled with explicit sexual metaphors, the Supreme Court found that the First Amendment didn’t prevent schools from disciplining children for offensively lewd and indecent speech. As the court explained, society’s interest in teaching “the boundaries of socially appropriate behavior” outweighed the student’s right to express his views in a way that was highly offensive to many of his classmates. (Bethel School Dist. No. 403 v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986).) Dangerous Speech After another high school student was suspended for refusing to take down a banner reading “BONG HiTS 4 JESUS” at a school event, he sued. The Supreme Court found that the principal hadn’t violated the boy’s free speech rights, because it was part of the school’s mission to protect students from messages that could be seen as promoting or celebrating illegal drug use (Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007)). Based on the reasoning in Morse, courts have given schools a fair amount of leeway in deciding whether students’ speech poses a danger to their classmates or teachers. School-Sponsored Speech and Student Journalism Teachers and other school authorities are allowed to censor or change what students write or say in school-sponsored publications (like an official school newspaper or yearbook), school plays, or other activities that involve the expression of ideas and are essentially part of the curriculum. The school must have a legitimate educational reason for the censorship. However, this broad editorial control doesn't apply if school authorities have, "by policy or by practice," allowed a school paper or online publication to become what courts call a public forum—meaning that it's an open platform for students to express themselves freely and make key decisions about content without prior approval from teachers or administrators. (Hazelwood School Dist. v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).) Most courts agree that this rule applies only to K-12 schools. Schools generally have less control over "underground" student journalism, whether online or in print. Also, a few states have laws that give student journalists greater free-speech protections than they have under the federal Hazelwood standard.

Join the Conversation

1 / 5

3.9k

Will Kylie Jenner and Jordyn Woods Remain Friends After Tristan Thompson Cheating Scandal?
People
Tom Brady, Gisele Bundchen pack on the PDA at rare red carpet event: Photos
AOL.com
Jordyn Woods Speaks at Event Amid Khloe Kardashian Drama: ‘It’s Been Real’
Entertainment Tonight

Karl Lagerfeld Left Instructions to His Store Employees About How He Wanted to Be Remembered
People
Selena Gomez Glams Up for Best Friend's Wedding: See the Pics!
Entertainment Tonight
Disney Unveils Major Epcot Refurb That'll Change The Face Of Future World
HuffPost Life
Tucker Carlson Guest Says African Americans ‘Need To Move On’ From Slavery
HuffPost
Judge to Roger Stone: ‘This Is Not Baseball. There Will Not Be a Third Chance’
Rolling Stone
Joey Fatone Reveals Which of His 'NSYNC Bandmates Recognized Him as the Rabbit on Masked Singer
People
Joanna Gaines' Son Crew Is Adorably Bored as He Joins His Mom for a Meeting: 'Bla Bla Bla'
People
‘Desus & Mero,’ With Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in Tow, Gives Late-Night a New Attitude (Column)
Variety
Jussie Smollett 'Feels Betrayed by a System That Wants to Skip Due Process': Attorneys
People
Michael Cohen Will Reportedly ‘Pull the Curtain Back’ on Trump’s Crimes
Rolling Stone
Defending 'Miss Daisy': Writer Alfred Uhry reflects on controversial Best Picture 30 years later
Yahoo Movies
How 'Black Panther' and 'Aquaman' changed the face of superhero cinema forever
Yahoo Movies
Tom Brady and Gisele Bündchen Kick Off the Model's Big Night with PDA on the Red Carpet
People